| By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, April 15, 2024 - 11:15 am: Edit |
Mike West:
Why would the KFAL have LS/RS phaser-3s? It is only, I admit, 5 years younger than the Falcon mauler. But the King Eagle and some other variants of the Eagle hull have RA/L and RA/R phasers on the rear of the engines. The larger arcs are more conducive to drone defense in the rear arc, and the small batteries with the optional firing arcs allow. the mauler weapon to be used in the forward arc.
| By Dal Downing (Rambler) on Thursday, June 06, 2024 - 05:10 pm: Edit |
Some probably noticed thiis alread but in, Captains log #51. The Romulan K3C Color SSD has the Transporter as Weapon's Pinkish color not System's Yellow.
| By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, March 30, 2025 - 01:37 pm: Edit |
Module F1
(R1.36) F-PS SSD: Missing minimum crew star.(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R1.38) FTP SSD: Ship Data Table missing Y175 refit bar. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.5) Jindarian DNX SSD: Has 6 T-bombs (same as DN) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 8).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.9) Jindarian BCX SSD: Has 6 T-bombs (same as BC) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 8).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.13) Jindarian CAX SSD: Has 4 T-bombs (same as CA) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 6).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.16) Jindarian CLP SSD: Year in service should be 182 (not 1) in the Crawford box. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.17) Jindarian CLT SSD: Year in service should be 1 (not 182) in the Crawford box. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
(R16.19) Jindarian CLX SSD: Has 4 T-bombs (same as CL) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 6).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).
| By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, March 30, 2025 - 08:46 pm: Edit |
Module F1
(R16.2) Jindarian DN SSD: Should have 10 deck crews (not 12) as there are only 10 spaces of non-prospecting shuttles. (Nick Samaras, March 30, 2025).
(R16.5) Jindarian DNX SSD: Should have 10 deck crews (not 12) as there are only 10 spaces of non-prospecting shuttles. (Nick Samaras, March 30, 2025).
| By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, April 01, 2025 - 04:06 pm: Edit |
Module C4:
(R52.3) Qari T90 BCH SSD: This ship lacks a "6" on the damage control track when every other BCH I can recall has one. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).
(R54.10) Sharkhunter DN SSD: Damage control track is 6-4-2-2-2-0. This is worse than the BCH a 6-4-4-2-2-0. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).
(R59.3) Canadi'en OAK: The ships has the same sensor, scanner, dam con and excess damage tracks as the MAP and CA. The CW SSD in Module P6 shows a different set of tracks, which is probably what this ship should be. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).
| By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Friday, April 04, 2025 - 10:56 pm: Edit |
Module R8
(R2.121) Federation PFF SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)
(R3.135) Klingon G6 SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. The boarding parties track lists "4" instead of "6". (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)
(R4.118) Romulan KF4 SSD: The single hull box in the rear hull needs an "R" or "A" designation. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)
(R8.47) Orion DD SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)
| By Jessica Orsini (Jessica_Orsini) on Thursday, April 10, 2025 - 10:41 am: Edit |
Federation MSRB
(R2.113) New Heavy Fighter Carrier (NHV): illustration shows four sensor dishes and no photon tubes; SSD (Module R10) has two special sensors and two photon tubes. (Jessica Orsini, April 10, 2025)
| Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |