Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Archive through March 09, 2013	25		03/09 11:28pm
	Archive through June 08, 2013	25		06/08 10:43pm
	Archive through July 16, 2013	25		07/16 07:55pm
	Archive through March 13, 2018	25		03/13 05:26pm

(OE25.15) (OE25.15) should be (OE24.15) on page 63 of the 2011 rulebook. - Ken Kazinski, 6 Nov 2018

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, August 31, 2020 - 08:01 pm: Edit

Timeline Y171 OMRB - On page 16 "border, but soon realize this cannot be the empier they were searching for and leave", empier should be empire. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Aug 2020.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, July 13, 2025 - 08:53 pm: Edit

(OR22.7) Module O4 SSD OL - The Old Eyebeam table has two range 16-30 brackets. As the damage is different, I am assuming the table was supposed to have a new range bracket. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OFD2.0) Module O4 - The rule does not state how TEM fighter rails operate or that TEMs are allowed on fighters. Possibly add (OFD2.17). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, July 13, 2025 - 08:55 pm: Edit

(OE10.14) OMRB-2011 - "Bbioelectric bolts" should be "Bioelectric bolts". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE1.2) OMRB-2011 - All of the phaser tables do not have rule numbers and probaly should. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE20.0) OMRB-2011 - What year is the Short-Range Cannon available? The Kligon ships arriving in Y171 to the Omega quadrant and spent a year trying to get home (Y172) before integrating in FRA society. Two years after that seems like a good place to start, which would be Y174. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE26.131) OMRB-2011 - The rule refers to sonic pulsers, but OE26.0 is for Transporter-Collectors. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE26.132) OMRB-2011 - The rule refers to sonic pulsers, but OE26.0 is for Transporter-Collectors. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE26.4) OMRB-2011 - For consistency TCB Combat Table should be Transporter-Collector Beam Combat Table. All the other tables did not use the SSD designation. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OE26.41) OMRB-2011 - For consistency TCB Combat Table should be Transporter-Collector Beam Combat Table. All the other tables did not use the SSD designation. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OFD2.0) OMRB-2011 - The rule does not state how TEM fighter rails operate or that TEMs are allowed on fighters. Possibly add (OFD2.17). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

Annex #7E Drone OMRB-2011 - The annex lists flame shield generator, but there is no flame shield generator in the master rule book. The flame shield generator should be flame shield projector (see OG7.0). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

Annex #7E OMRB-2011 - The annex lists flame shield generator, but there is no flame shield generator in the master rule book. The flame shield generator should be flame shield projector (see OG7.0). Note there are two references. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(OG1.31) OMRB-2011 - The annex lists flame shield generator, but there is no flame shield generator in the master rule book. The flame shield generator should be flame shield projector (see OG7.0). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

Page 359 OMRB-2011 - The annex lists flame shield generator, but there is no flame shield generator in the master rule book. The flame shield generator should be flame shield projector (see OG7.0). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Sunday, July 13, 2025 - 09:23 pm: Edit

To reply to the short-range cannon note:

According to (OR17.02) in the 2011 edition of the Omega Master Rulebook, the Orion raider cruiser Throne of Ozymondas (OR17.P1) had a prototype Klingon anti-drone system (and ammunition for it) in its cargo bay at the time of its arrival in the Omega Octant; this was reverse-engineered and adapted into the short-range cannon for use with the Auroran navy.

Which, of course, still leaves a question: how did an Orion ship happen to have both a prototype ADD and a cloaking device in Y130, when neither technology had been invented in the Alpha Octant yet?

The problem is that a number of FRA ships and fighters, such as the frigate escort (OR17.9) and Doberman-2 (OR17.F2), have SRCs installed; the YIS dates for such units might not be easily adjustable forward to match, say, the arrival of Kraknora in Y171.

So, I propose adjusting the arrival date of the Throne itself to Y142, and the YIS date (of it actually entering Auroran service) to Y143. As in, to have it emerge in Auroran space via the Cosmic Nexus as a "stand-alone" event, rather than having been lurking in the Aurora system back in Y130. This would still allow the conveniently-placed ADD prototype to be adapted into the SRC in time for the first frigate escort to enter service in Y144.

Would this work for anyone?

-----

Also, on a side note:

For the most part, "quadrant" is a post-1979 Franchise term, which for the most part does not apply to the SFU Milky Way Galaxy map - with the partial exception of the six adjacent sectors (from Kappa to Omicron) occupied by the Xorkaelian Tyranny.

Xork home space - and the distinctively-termed Sargasso Storm Zone - aside, the more proper term here would be "octant": Alpha Octant, Omega Octant, and Sigma Octant.