By Christopher E. Fant (Cfant) on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 - 06:46 pm: Edit |
Indeed.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 - 09:26 pm: Edit |
Quote:The Nations need rebuilding. This is the current state of things in Y200. (When the plans for X2 are probably being laid.)
By Jeff Tonglet (Blackbeard) on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 - 09:53 pm: Edit |
(sigh)
There are two totally different time periods that for some reason we've combined into "X2".
Y205 - The Trade Wars
Y225 - The Xork Invasion
These two periods right now have nothing in common, except their name. Now I understand why someone several months back wanted to use the term "X3" for the Xork period.
I suggest that we completely ignore Xorks in these ship discussions.
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 - 10:00 pm: Edit |
Indeed. Enough has been said.
By Christopher E. Fant (Cfant) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 12:27 am: Edit |
Indeed. The Xorks do not exist to us and therefore have no effect on current discussions.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 02:18 am: Edit |
Yes, I supose the refit theory just apllies in the handful a years after that are immediately after the end of the heating up of the trade wars. After all the new ships are being built with the full capasity of the original design, there won't be any refit unless there is new technological development ( like a BTTY refit ).
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 03:28 pm: Edit |
Building a ship with the capacity to refit it later is something that would still be done in Y205 if the races had agreed to certain limitations in a post war treaty. The Feds really don't need redundant laboratory configurations directly hooked into the main power grid, but since it doesn't violate treaty it is approved for production. The fact that a G2X drone rack has double the throughput due to eliminating the reload time doesn't impact the maximum number of drones that can be launched in a single turn so it is allowed by treaty. No race really needs the industrial age cooling fins built into the P5 when a liquid nitrogen solution requires so much less space, but the treaty allows it. Room for expansion built into the hulls is perfectly reasonable if the politics of the era demands certain military compromises. I would like to see as one of the stipulations that no race is allowed to build an X2 ship during the trade wars more powerful than their XCA. Treaty limitations would measure this by weaponry and not include advances such as the SIF and Special Bridge.
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 03:33 pm: Edit |
Tos: Do you mean the ASIF and S-Bridge would not be limited by treaty? THat would be right because, though useful in battle, they are really peace time devices.
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 03:40 pm: Edit |
That's correct. The weaponry from CA(X1)->CA(X2) stays approximately equivalent but other advances still result in increased BPV. ASIF, S-Bridge, self-shield penetrating transporters, more labs, convertible cargo bays, etc. are not combat enhancements and therefore permitted by treaty.
By Christopher E. Fant (Cfant) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 04:00 pm: Edit |
That is what I would like to see.
A CX and an XCA should have equivilant combat power.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 07:19 pm: Edit |
Quote:A CX and an XCA should have equivilant combat power.
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Thursday, July 24, 2003 - 10:16 am: Edit |
These will be brand new hull designs. A few extra boxes here or there are to be expected and reasonable.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 12:29 am: Edit |
I was thinking something about X1R.
At some point X2 ships will need to be part of GW fleets, with X1 ship being possibly mixed in with the fleet or left out as poart of Rapid Responce Squadrons.
Here's the idea.
At some time late in the X2 period the Galactic power developed the ability to to intergrate more X ships into the their GW fleets.
Before X2 ship were developed they developed the ability to integrate one X2 SC4 ship, one X2 SC3 ship and one X2 SC2 ship into their fleets in addition to those allowed under XS8.0!
It was from this ability that allowed the X1 era fleets to feild DNXs.
The fleet my be organised placing one X1 ship in the spot of an X2 ship. With a ship of the smaller size class being placed in the spot of a larger size class vessel.
This meant that late in the X1 period, mixed fleets of X1 and GW ship could have as as much 1 DNX, 2 CX and 2 DDX in their fold.
In the early X2 period this became, 1 XCA, 1 XDD, 1 XFF, 1CX & 1 DDX...although in the late X2 period it is possible for a XDN to have been built by some races suplanting the XCA.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 02:47 am: Edit |
What about the "All-X Squadron doctrine" and historical forces like the ISC Echelon of Judgement (All-X1 fleet)
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 07:08 am: Edit |
Quote:What about the "All-X Squadron doctrine" and historical forces like the ISC Echelon of Judgement (All-X1 fleet)
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 07:28 am: Edit |
Historically, it was a viable concept from the word "go" just waiting for enough X-ships to orm viable fleets.
By Geoff Conn (Talonz) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 01:16 pm: Edit |
At some point X2 ships will need to be part of GW fleets,
HUH? X2 ships were not produced until Y206!!!
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 07:58 pm: Edit |
G.C.:
Yeah...In Y207, if I have 1 XDD and 1 XFF...do I make a two ship squadron!?!...use them individually or stuff them into the same fleet as say a CVA group.
The XFF probably makes the best Carrier Escort ever seen and the XDD makes for a pretty manouverable little ship, that can jump up with the CX and DDX already in that fleet and strike unexpectedly with a mid-turn speed change thanks to her BTTYs.
By Geoff Conn (Talonz) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 08:27 pm: Edit |
What CVA group? The andros have been defeated for 5 years and everyone is in recovery mode. Remember 2X is supposed to be the era of Trade Wars so I would imagine alot of single ship action with some rare squadron skirmishs.
By Mike Raper (Raperm) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 08:40 pm: Edit |
Geoff, presumably there will still be some GW ships still floating around out there when X2 is in full swing. I personally would find it hard, though, to intermingle the two effectively, since one is so much better than the other.
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 12:03 am: Edit |
X0 will be great at convoy escort and national guard duty where speed isn't critical. A mixed squadron would mean an X2 ship has come to the aid of a convoy currently under attack.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 03:19 am: Edit |
Quote:What CVA group? The andros have been defeated for 5 years and everyone is in recovery mode. Remember 2X is supposed to be the era of Trade Wars so I would imagine alot of single ship action with some rare squadron skirmishs.
Quote:Geoff, presumably there will still be some GW ships still floating around out there when X2 is in full swing. I personally would find it hard, though, to intermingle the two effectively, since one is so much better than the other.
Quote:X0 will be great at convoy escort and national guard duty where speed isn't critical. A mixed squadron would mean an X2 ship has come to the aid of a convoy currently under attack.
By Geoff Conn (Talonz) on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 04:50 am: Edit |
MJC you are floating a paper tiger as it were. All war constuction ships will be out of service. NCAs and HDWs may be relegated to provincial defence forces or police duty. Anything else will be mothballed.
The Trade Wars era is presumably all about economics, and thus getting the most bang for your buck. To protect your economy in a limited intensity conflict you will need a number of highly mobile and capable ships to respond at a moments notice, and likely not in huge numbers. Ergo 2X cruisers and destroyers.
Fleets, as you mention, are to eliminate bases and enemy fleets. There will be no need for that in the Trade Wars (short of some Xork incursion yet to come).
Therefore, we need not be concerned about how 2X ships will integrate with virtually nonexistent GW fleets.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 02:07 pm: Edit |
Then escalation of force sets in and fleets mushroom because everybody else's is.
By Geoff Conn (Talonz) on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 06:08 pm: Edit |
What escalation of force? The Trade Wars is more of a cold war, low intensity embargo, raid, etc. conflict. It is not a full scale war.
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |