Subtopic | Posts | Updated | ||
Archive through December 09, 2019 | 25 | 12/21 01:14pm | ||
Archive through November 05, 2022 | 25 | 12/06 10:32am |
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Wednesday, November 30, 2022 - 02:24 pm: Edit |
First empire listed enters from the left side of a standard SFB map, second empire listed enters from the right side. Both enter on turn # anywhere along their side of the map, both speed Max, WS-III. an object has appeared in hex 2215 of the map, and the forces are charged with both gathering as much inofrmation (labs, probes, special sensors, BUT NOT SHUTTLES, this is not a monster scenario) and denying information to the opposing force. The object will disappear from the map at the end of Turn #15. Any ship can disengage from the map by exiting off of the edge it entered from, leaving from any other edge will count as the ship being destroyed.
Mike West (Orion) versus Gary Carney (Carnivon)
Dal Downing (Kligon) versus Paul Franz (Andromedan)
I am sorry to say that this is all there is.
By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 30, 2022 - 09:58 pm: Edit |
Do destroyed ships add to the information gathered or does the unit have to survive to have its information points counted?
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, December 05, 2022 - 01:44 pm: Edit |
I had considered limiting what a given ship could learn and it having to survive. However, given computers and their ability to process information, ships are in contact with each other and sending what they learn and the rule (G4.1) says the number of lab boxes that are still intact at the end of the turn, based on your closest approach (the individual ship). In short, if your ship survives to the end of the turn it gets to rol and every other ship on your side knows what it knows, but if it becomes a rapidly expanding cloud of debris it does not learn anything/
By Mike West (Mjwest) on Monday, December 05, 2022 - 03:28 pm: Edit |
Just to be clear: I am assuming that to "win" the scenario, you must gather more information than the other side. Is this correct? Is there any modification for ships lost in this pursuit?
If so, then I picked the wrong force. Literally the only way for the Orions to win is to completely and totally destroy the opposing force. That way his information total is zero. Otherwise (especially in light of your last post), the Orions automatically lose the scenario.
(Also to be clear: I am NOT complaining. You pick your force and deal with the results. I have no issue with any of that. I just want to make sure I am fully understanding the situation.)
By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Tuesday, December 06, 2022 - 10:32 am: Edit |
Given that the Orion force somehow got away with fielding five Size Class 3 ships which they were barred from taking over in the SFB version of this scenario (yes, I know they were picked with the expectation that they would be barred here also, but still...), and which they have loaded up with a mix of non-historical weapon mounts (and yes, I'm also aware that there are no "formal" weapon mount percentage limitations in FC, but still...), I'm not quite as sympathetic towards their predicament as I might have otherwise been.
But then, I suppose it won't seem so bad that the death bolt racks have a drone rack's launch rate - though I still think this should be errata-ed "down" to one DB launch every second turn at some point prior to the "lost empire" Carnivons' formal publication.
By Mike West (Mjwest) on Tuesday, December 06, 2022 - 12:32 pm: Edit |
EDIT: I thought the deathbolt rack only has one deathbolt in the rack, not four. With four, yes, that is an issue. I intended to use the reloading to spread out the firing, but that was apparently rejected.
Also: And now we know why they weren't banned. It doesn't matter.
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Wednesday, December 07, 2022 - 01:44 pm: Edit |
Sorry, but each Orion has 1 (one) lab, i.e.., a control space used as a lab. So you basically have to use your punch from the size of your ships to destroy your opponent.
By Fredrick Kreller (Kreller1) on Wednesday, December 07, 2022 - 11:01 pm: Edit |
Guess I spent too long away from the boards, or I would have submitted a force. Good luck to the four commanders who were able to submit forces!
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Thursday, February 16, 2023 - 05:02 pm: Edit |
I do not have the tactics articles from DAL DOWNING (Klingon), GARY CARNEY (Carnivon), or PAUL. FRANZ (Andromedan)
By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Friday, February 17, 2023 - 09:32 am: Edit |
Carnivon battle group article (re-)submitted.
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Friday, February 17, 2023 - 02:35 pm: Edit |
Gary:
This is the last paragraph of what has appeared for your article. Is there more after this? I cannot get anything beyond this paragraph at the end of your article: During both firing and arming turns, our squadron shall attempt to pass closely enough to the artifact to launch probes, as well as to use our labs to gather information. But if this must be held off for a few turns in order to focus on mission-killing the Orion hellbore cruisers, well and good; we can spare just enough time to do this while still being able to catch up (or maintain a lead) in terms of the total amount of information being gathered.
By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Friday, February 17, 2023 - 03:47 pm: Edit |
I do not have the tactics articles from DAL DOWNING (Klingon, or PAUL FRANZ (Andromedan). They were matched against each other.
By Paul Franz (Andromedan) on Saturday, February 18, 2023 - 09:53 am: Edit |
Steve,
I did send mine in. I will resend.
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |