By Dixon Simpkins (Dixsimpkins) on Thursday, August 04, 2011 - 01:33 am: Edit |
Seems like it. Ph-3s 2x[EF], 2x[CGHI], 2x[DGHI] should be Disruptors.
By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Thursday, August 04, 2011 - 08:58 am: Edit |
Email sent to Daniel Kast.
By Mike Slade (Therealmxslade) on Saturday, September 17, 2011 - 10:15 pm: Edit |
I asked this over at the MJ12 board & didn't get a response from the people in charge, so I'll ask here.
What's next for Starfleet Armada?
By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Sunday, September 18, 2011 - 10:46 am: Edit |
Question has been sent to Daniel and SVC.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 03:43 pm: Edit |
Probably battleships armada.
By Bennett Eugene Snyder (Planner) on Wednesday, October 26, 2011 - 04:27 pm: Edit |
I've been wondering about something written in Romulan Armada concerning the Fed Battle Frigate and Strike Cruiser.
How can the Third Fleet refuse the allocation of ships to their forces? I would think they'd be outranked and have to use the ships.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, October 26, 2011 - 05:41 pm: Edit |
Political pull. The commander of the 3rd Fleet is the next admiral commanding all of Star Fleet. He didn't get there without the power (connections, friends, influence, politicians on a string) to get what he wants.
By Bennett Eugene Snyder (Planner) on Friday, October 28, 2011 - 10:48 pm: Edit |
Must be a descendent of Ernest J. King.
By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 05:57 pm: Edit |
Is Battleships Armada set to be published in the new Starmada format from the get-go, or will it still be in line with the pre-existing Admiralty Edition-compatible modules?
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 06:42 pm: Edit |
Good question. Might do it both ways. Might just do it the new way. Marketing may have to decide that one.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 03:13 pm: Edit |
I am not aware of that errata so no, it has not been worked into the books. If it had been sent to me, I would have worked it in, but I never knew there was any errata.
By Dixon Simpkins (Dixsimpkins) on Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 10:21 pm: Edit |
Could a moderator move the above two posts (or the links to the mj12 site) into the Starmada Errata section of the forum? It would make more sense there rather than here.
By Darren Kehrer (Kehrer1701) on Friday, January 20, 2012 - 04:39 pm: Edit |
Since SVC didn't know of the errata, I posted here (since errata is locked). My intent was to list here and ask it to be moved, you just beat me to the asking...
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, January 20, 2012 - 04:45 pm: Edit |
My computer won't do it, and Jean is on the road and won't be able to do it before Monday. You might email Joel as his PC will do it.
By Dixon Simpkins (Dixsimpkins) on Friday, January 20, 2012 - 10:28 pm: Edit |
Email sent.
By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Friday, January 20, 2012 - 11:45 pm: Edit |
Done.
Jean
WebMom
By Dixon Simpkins (Dixsimpkins) on Sunday, January 22, 2012 - 12:33 am: Edit |
Thank you!
By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Friday, February 03, 2012 - 02:05 pm: Edit |
Should there be a version of Battleships Armada in the Admiralty Edition format, could the Neo-Tholian NBB be given both its disruptor and particle cannon variants, in order to allow it to fight historical battles back in the home galaxy? (With two ship diagrams on each page, perhaps the Milky Way version could be on one half, and the M81 version on the other?)
For that matter, could there be room in the file for the PC-armed Neo-Tholians that were left out of Alien Armada; or maybe even the OGD and OGR? (Perhaps doubled-up to save space?)
By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - 05:45 am: Edit |
Here is a rumor: according to the MJ12 forum the new edition will be called "Starmada:Nova" and there is a preview attached to the second post on this page: http://www.mj12games.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3565&p=26098&hilit=starmada+nova+edition#p26098
By Terry O'Carroll (Terryoc) on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - 06:42 am: Edit |
Rather more than a rumour, you can download the first thirteen pages of the new rulebook.
By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - 04:17 pm: Edit |
@ Terry, I know about the download, but what I don't see is an "official announcement" that says it will be called "Starmada: Nova" admittedly I am not super familiar with the MJ12 boards. I was just passing on some info I found.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - 04:03 pm: Edit |
Not sure what to do with the new starmada edition. We really don't want to make the four existing star fleet books obsolete, and a few of the customers have told us they don't even want a new edition at all. We're tossing around the idea of star fleet just ignoring the nova edition and having Daniel do this year's book (battleships) as an admiral edition book.
Thoughts? do you really want to replace the four books you have? (The new ship format means we'd probably combine them into one larger book, but even so, do you want to rebuy the line or would you rather stay admiral?)
By Terry O'Carroll (Terryoc) on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - 04:37 pm: Edit |
Personally I'd rebuy it.
By Ken Rodeghero (Ken_Rodeghero) on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - 06:25 pm: Edit |
I will purchase the Nova edition of Starmada as I like the changes and have every previous edition. I would like to see the Star Fleet Universe line of Starmada products completed for both editions (Admiral and Nova), personally, and would buy them all.
By Paul Franz (Andromedan) on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - 10:37 pm: Edit |
Ken,
I am with you.
Paul Franz
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |