| Subtopic | Posts | Updated | ||
| LDR SIT Files | 4 | 05/10 04:04pm | |
| Processed LDR SIT Reports | 19 | 05/09 06:40pm |
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 04:06 pm: Edit |
Posted a new SIT.
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 04:09 pm: Edit |
First report: Add "campaign only" to the stellar fortresses.
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 04:13 pm: Edit |
PF4 and PF5 dates fixed.
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 05:54 pm: Edit |
Thank you very much (especially since I am actually playing a game with the LDR in it).
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 05:56 pm: Edit |
Wait, it should be tilted 90 degrees.
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 06:02 pm: Edit |
After Purchased Hydran Hulls, 'negotiated' is misspelled. Eitzen 5/10/17
| By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 06:44 pm: Edit |
HWX (all subtypes)- The LDR doesn't have a HDWX class (see R14.202 flavor text). Reference should thus be "Future" instead of 210 - Howard Bampton 2017-05-10
| By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar2) on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 - 08:01 pm: Edit |
BCS - missing '+P' notation in all conversions and in build costs - SWFrazier 170510
HDW POG - missing '+P' notation in build costs - SWFrazier 170510
| By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 12:57 pm: Edit |
Polishing Stewart Frazier's 2017-05-10 8:01PM post to make it cut and paste for SVC:
BCS build cost missing PFs: "For BCH: 17+6+¶" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
BCS conversion cost missing PFs: "From BCV: 3+¶" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
BCS conversion cost missing PFs: "From BCP: 2+6+¶" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
BCS conversion cost missing PFs: "From CL‡: 11+6+¶" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
BCS conversion cost missing PFs: "From BCH: 5+6+¶" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS CONCURS with all above.
| By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 12:57 pm: Edit |
Polishing Stewart Frazier's 2017-05-10 8:01PM post to make it cut and paste for SVC:
HDW POG build cost missing PFs: "(525.23P): 5+¶" 525.23P notes cost is 5+PFS. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS CONCURS.
| By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 12:58 pm: Edit |
HDW FOP build cost should be, I think "(525.23R): 0+6" aka zero to convert and 6 for the FCR factors. Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
HDW HOG build cost should be "(525.23H): 0+14" aka zero to convert and 14 for the heavy FTR factors. Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry. COG notes that free FTR factors can be used to reduce cost (thus the +10 notation). HOG text strongly implies the same. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS CONCURS.
| By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 02:01 pm: Edit |
HDW FOP - additional data Paravians have 1+5 for cost. Amended entry:
HDW FOP build cost should be "(525.23R): 1+5" Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry and allows for free FTR use in purchase. Cost backported from Paravians. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS: Per (525.23R), the cost should read "0+6" as "1+5" is incorrect; one is paying for six FCR factors. (This is my fault as I copied the data from another unit and forgot to correct it after cloning it.)
FEDS: This is the most correct format:
COG: (525.23V): 0+10
FOP: (525.23R): 0+6
HOG: (525.23H): 0+14
POG: (525.23P): 5+¶
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 09:46 pm: Edit |
I just copy and paste the +P part so I don't need the polish.
| By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 08:53 pm: Edit |
CCH: The SFB Ref # should be R14.30. F Brooks, 16 May 2017
HDWQ: The word "Scout" in the Notes column should be "Survey". F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
MPX: The SFB Ref # should be R14.205. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
HYD RN: Should the "(1.5)" in the Factors column be "(1)" with the triangle? F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
| By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 08:53 pm: Edit |
HEAVY AUXILIARIES: There should be an open paren before "FOUR" in the black header bar. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
HEAVY AUXILIARIES: The word "Heavy" should be added to the beginning of the Notes column for those units that don't already have it. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
JUMBO AUXILIARIES: The first close paren in the black header bar should an open paren. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
JF: The SFB Ref # should be R1.A30. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
LARGE AUXILIARIES: The word "Aux" in the Notes column should be "Auxiliary" to be consistent with how other empires are listing auxiliary units. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
| By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 08:54 pm: Edit |
LAV: The SFB Ref # should be R1.13B. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
LAP: One of the references to (526.4) in the Notes column should be removed. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
SMALL AUXILIARIES: The word "Aux" in the Notes column should be "Auxiliary" to be consistent with how other empires are listing auxiliary units. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
SAV: The word "From" should be added before "SAC" in the Conversion Costs column. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
MON: The reference to (419.15) in the Build Cost column should be (519.15). F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
| By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 08:54 pm: Edit |
BS(x): The SFB Ref # should be R1.3 (no zero before the 3). F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
BSX(x): The SFB Ref # should be R1.207. F Brooks, 16 May 2017.
MEGA: The Date Avail column should probably be Y179. F Brooks, 16 May 2017. NO JUSTIFICATION! REJECTED
MEGA-H: The Date Avail column should probably be Y179F. F Brooks, 16 May 2017. NO JUSTIFICATION! REJECTED
| By Rob Padilla (Zargan) on Thursday, August 24, 2017 - 05:46 pm: Edit |
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Saturday, March 30, 2019 - 10:01 pm: Edit |
POL: perhaps put a note that it can be substituted for a MP? Surely this is possible? Eitzen 3/30/19.
| By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, April 01, 2019 - 04:44 pm: Edit |
Richard B. Eitzen:
I need to know what State to list for the Tac Notes. At this juncture I just know you are no longer in Florida.
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Monday, April 01, 2019 - 04:51 pm: Edit |
Oh sorry, I am in California now.
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, August 07, 2019 - 03:06 pm: Edit |
STJ is not listed as a possible mauler for the LDR, though the STL and STT are. This omission seems accidental and should possibly be rectified. Eitzen 8/7/19.
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, September 22, 2019 - 08:04 pm: Edit |
War Destroyers and Variants: DWSX: Factors: 5-8 Scout Symbol/2-5 Scout Symbol should be: 5-8 Scout Symbol/2-4 Scout Symbol. The crippled defensive value of the DWX is 4. The DWSX is the scout variant and should have the same defensive value on the crippled side. Thomas Mathews 22 Sep 2019
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, March 05, 2020 - 12:00 am: Edit |
Page 1 DNP "From CA+DND‡: 4+¶▼" should be "From CA + DND‡: 4+¶▼"
Page 6 For consistency "HEAVY AUXILIARIES FOUR PODS, CLASS-IV)" should be "HEAVY AUXILIARIES (FOUR-POD HULL)"
Page 6 For consistency "JUMBO AUXILIARIES )THREE PODS, CLASS-III)" should be "JUMBO AUXILIARIES (THREE-POD HULL)"
Page 6 JAA "For 3AuxPods: 6" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 6"
Page 6 JAC "For 3 Auxpods: 6 (1/ year)" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 6 (1/year)"
Page 6 JAR "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 6 JAS "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 6 JTH "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 6 JAV "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 6 JHV "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 7 JSC "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux Pods:"
Page 7 FTS "For AuxPod: 3" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 3"
Page 7 SAS "ForAux Pod: 4" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 4"
Page 7 SAA "ForAux Pod: 2" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 2"
Page 7 SAC "ForAuxPod: 2" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 2"
Page 7 SAV Should not "SAC: 1+6" be "From SAC: 1+6"?
Page 7 SAV "ForAuxPod: 2+6" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 2+6"
Page 7 SAH "ForAuxPod: 2+8" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 2+8"
Page 7 SAP "For AuxPod: 4+¶" should be "For 1 Aux Pod: 4+¶"
Page 8 BS(FP)[With fighters and gunboats] "From: BS(F): 2+¶" should be "From BS(F): 2+¶"
Page 9 BTX(N) [No fighters/ gunboats] "From: BSX(N): 3" should be "From BSX(N): 3"
Page 9 BTX(F) [with fighters] "From: BSX(F): 3 From: BTX(N): 2+6" should be "From BSX(F): 3 From BTX(N): 2+6"
Page 10 BTX(FP) [with fighters and gunboats] "From: BSX(F): 5+¶ From: BSX(FP): 3 From: BTX(N): 4+6+¶ From: BTX(F): 2+¶" should be "From BSX(F): 5+¶ From BSX(FP): 3 From BTX(N): 4+6+¶ From BTX(F): 2+¶"
| By Ted Fay (Catwhoeatsphoto) on Friday, August 07, 2020 - 10:42 am: Edit |
Page 7. Suggest, in the SAV row, adding conversion of SAA directly to SAV with the 2-step conversion symbol for a cost of 1+6. ((The 2-step is SAA->SAC->SAV for a cost of 1(SAA->SAC)+1(SAC->SAV)-1(2-step savings for same hull) =1 plus 6 (the cost of fighters.))) TDF 8/7/20
| Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |