Gorn BSX: Notes state "Module Limits: 2FTM or one FTM + 1PFM. This suggests that this Gorn base only has two modules, which is incorrect. Should read "Module Limits: 2FTM + 1PFM". Or, refer rule 441.4. Graham Wardle 14.7.08.

By Graham Stewart Wardle (Tasmerlin) on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 08:52 am: Edit

Gorn BTX: Notes state "Module Limits: 2FTM or one FTM + 1PFM". This suggests that this Gorn base only has two modules, which is incorrect. Should read "Module Limits:2FTM + 1PFM". Or,refer rule 441.4. Graham Wardle 14.7.09.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 04:24 pm: Edit

Federation Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Klingon Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Romulan Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Kzinti Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Gorn Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Hydran Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
Lyran Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009
LDR Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - 01:29 pm: Edit

Klingon REP POD is listed twice in the PODS section of the SIT. Recommend removing one entry. Thomas Mathews 23 Sep 2009
ISC Colony Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 23 Sep 2009

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, October 31, 2009 - 09:47 am: Edit

Maybe this should be in the Why Topic for F&E.

Why does the Gorn DDT (Theater Transport) have a YIS date of Y175 when everyone else, who has a Theater Transport, has a YIS date of Y140 or Y150?

By Robert Padilla (Zargan) on Saturday, October 31, 2009 - 10:21 am: Edit

The Romulan Theatre Transports have a YIS date of 170 for the SKH and the SHH is 175 also. They don't have any others that I see.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, October 31, 2009 - 10:49 am: Edit

Rob, they also have the Freight Eagle (FE) with a YIS of 164.

By David Porter (Davidp) on Saturday, October 31, 2009 - 01:11 pm: Edit

In G2 the DDT has a YIS Date of 129 (page 50).

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, November 19, 2009 - 10:25 am: Edit

Federation FFT is listed twice once as FFT EcoWar and once as FFT SO Recommend removing FFT EcoWar entry. Thomas Mathews 19 Nov 2009

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 12:54 pm: Edit

SVC, A very gentle and not at the top of the list question.

Will new MSIT's for each empire be done with the publication of the next new F&E product after 2010?

I know that 2010 is the priority now and well it should be.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, December 28, 2009 - 11:29 pm: Edit

Federation Hvy-Ftr Module add to SIT Ref 1.70; factors 0 (9)/0(4▲); product AO; CR0; available Y178; Base NA From None; For 1+18; salvage 0.0; Notes F-111 Ftr Mod See (527.0) Thomas Mathews 29 Dec 09

Kzinti Hvy-Ftr Module add to SIT Ref 1.70; factors 0(8)/0(4); product AO; CR0; available Y178; Base NA From None; For 1+16; salvage 0.0; Notes See (530.0) Thomas Mathews 29 Dec 09

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, December 29, 2009 - 06:08 pm: Edit

well that's annoying. lol. my triangle symbol from word didn't copy over very well.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 07:24 pm: Edit

Copied from the Q&A thread where I originally asked:

Q: (436.0), (312.323), and (525.1) Can a B9 carry one or two SFGs?

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 - 09:05 am: Edit

Why is the Hydran CR factors 5/2 when everyone else's equivalent frigate 5/3, e.g Federation FF factors 5/3?

By Michael Parker (Protagoras07) on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 - 10:33 am: Edit

For the same reason the HN is 3-4/2 when other small FF's are 4/2. Cuz Hydrans are weird.. and they smell funny too!

By Clell Flint (Clell) on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 - 12:35 pm: Edit

The Heavy weapons Hydrans use are to blame.
The HN uses Fusion beams which are very short ranged. The CR uses the Hellbore (IIRC) which is designed to hit the weakest sheild. Once you cripple both of them though they are pretty much like any other crippled FF, mostly useless.

By Ted Fay (Catwhoeatsphoto) on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 - 03:49 pm: Edit

I like Mike Parker's explanation better, especially the part about smelling funny!

By Daniel G. Knipfer (Dgknipfer) on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 06:21 pm: Edit

Will the SIT get one last scrub before F&E2010 to make sure that all 2010 information is correct?

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 06:41 pm: Edit

Not a good place to ask that. It won't even be seen before 2010 is done.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 09:47 pm: Edit

Federation GVX Factors 10-12(9H) Sc Symbol/5-6(4H) Sc Symbol should read 10-12(9H)Sc Symbol/5-6(4.5H) Sc Symbol Thomas Mathews 28 Feb 10

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 11:57 pm: Edit

Federation GVX: Crippled side fighter factors should read: 4 [triangle]H. STRONG - 28 Feb 2010

By John W. Lawton (Kyloth) on Thursday, March 25, 2010 - 01:51 pm: Edit

Hi:
Where can I find the latest SIT's files? I downloaded the ones from the folder above 2008+. Are these the latest ones?
Thanks
John

By Mike Curtis (Nashvillen) on Thursday, March 25, 2010 - 02:50 pm: Edit

The latest ones, other than the ones in F&E2010, should be dated somewhere around July 18th, 2008, I believe.

By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Monday, March 29, 2010 - 09:07 pm: Edit

Two HD questions...

Gorn CVD: Should these really be an 8 Defense factor? Not sure if there were some doctrine issue that made these a higher defense. It is base hull of course is the HD a 7/4 ship. - L. Bergen 29 March 2010

Gorn HDV: Should these really be an 8 Defense factor? Not sure if there were some doctrine issue that made these a higher defense. It is base hull of course is the HD a 7/4 ship. - L. Bergen 29 March 2010

By John Wyszynski (Starsabre) on Monday, March 29, 2010 - 09:45 pm: Edit

The Gorn CVD and HDV both have a rear bubble over the HDD. They are a bit odd in that have added hull but not bigger engines. The 8 factor is right if you look at the ships.