Okay thanks for the info on the Gorn CVD and HDV. There was not a note to justify the higher number and I didn't have the SFB SSDs to look at...the CVD in particular I thought might have gotten accidentally dropped into the wrong grouping (instead of the CL...where an 8 factor and the designator would have made sense).

By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Saturday, April 03, 2010 - 09:15 am: Edit

Gorn HDM or MDH: Suggest deleting one of these as they are the same ship scheduled for NO product release. Note the line item for MDH has stats listed and may have appeared with other conjectural maulers in CLog. - L. Bergen 4 April 2010

By ROBERT l cALLAWAY (Callaway) on Saturday, April 03, 2010 - 09:34 am: Edit

lAWERANCE according to my memory (the books ar at home) an HDM IS A MS and the MHD is the conjectural mauler

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 03, 2010 - 09:38 am: Edit

Gorn HDM: Suggest deleting the entry. The SFB refrence and Notes are the same as the Gorn MDH. Thomas Mathews 4 April 2010 The Factors are missing from the HDM but are included in the MDH.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 04, 2010 - 09:28 am: Edit

Klingon B10VA 83 20(12)A/10(6) Future 10 Y175(436.0) B10(2) From B10 4+16+3 (SFG) From B10V 3 (SFG) Must Convert 10.8 Heavy Carrier variant of B10 (436.0) Stasis Field Generator Variant (312.0) Single Ship Carrier Thomas Mathews 4 Apr 2010 Add complete missing variant

Klingon B10SA 84 20(6)PA/10(3)P Future 10 Y179(436.0) B10(2) From B10 5+4+3 (SFG) From B10V 5+3 (SFG) From B10S 3 (SFG) Must Convert 10.8 SCS variant of B10 (436.0) Stasis Field Generator Variant (312.0) Single Ship Carrier Thomas Mathews 4 Apr 2010 Add complete missing variant

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, April 04, 2010 - 12:55 pm: Edit

Thomas:

ONLY the B10/B10A are single ship carriers.

The B10V/B10VA/B10S/B10SA are classed as "Heavy Carriers" or "Space Control Ships" in the SIT notes section and each require full escort packages.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 04, 2010 - 01:34 pm: Edit

I see. I misread (312.265) thinking it said that the SFG ship could not be escorted. Instead of the fact that it could be attacked as an individual ship.

I did miss two conversion possibilities, 1 for each unit.

Klingon B10VA From B10A 4+16 Thomas Mathews 4 Apr 2010

Klingons B10S from B10A 5+4 Thomas Mathews 4 Apr 2010

[Edited, by author's request to include Klingon before the ships. Fixed three more typos that made may fingers itch. -- Jean]

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, April 04, 2010 - 02:31 pm: Edit

Klingon B10A-: Ref 17; Compot 20A/10; Product Future; CR 10; Y171 (436.0); Hull/Size B10 (2); From B10-: 3 or 6 See (312.321); Must Convert; Salv 10.8; Stasis B10 without fighters - see (436.0); Single Ship Carrier. Designation with 2xSFG: B10AA-
Strong - 3 Apr 2010

By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 06:43 pm: Edit

Gorn DNE is available Y166 according to the SIT, but scenario 698 (The War that Almost Was) has a couple in their home fleet at Y157.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 08:10 am: Edit

I wrote

---

Quote:

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 07:24 pm: Edit


Copied from the Q&A thread where I originally asked:

Q: (436.0), (312.323), and (525.1) Can a B9 carry one or two SFGs?

---

By A. David Merritt (Adm) on Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 01:03 am: Edit

Where are the R1 SITs?

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 04:13 am: Edit

The R1 information is incorporated into each races SITS.

By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 12:22 pm: Edit

* Looks at Ryan *

Each empire's SIT.

By Terry "Full Stop" O'Carroll (Terryoc) on Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 01:21 pm: Edit

The only 'race' that responds to "SIT!" is the Carnivons.

By A. David Merritt (Adm) on Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 03:29 pm: Edit

Thanks all. Sorry I was a bit brief last night I was trying to do too many things at once.

By James Wood (Jwood314) on Friday, April 30, 2010 - 05:58 pm: Edit

I am confused, where do I get the most recent SITs?

Thanks ahead of time.

James

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Friday, April 30, 2010 - 06:03 pm: Edit

James, in the 2008 SITs there is one each major empire except the ISC.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, April 30, 2010 - 07:00 pm: Edit

The most recent SITs are on the BBS in the folder for them.

By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Saturday, May 01, 2010 - 12:28 pm: Edit

James at some point the SITs will get an update. ADB has been busy with other things and will eventually get to the SITs which received more of a format change (SVC called it the Strong Format) than real update the last go around (2008). Everyone loved the format change.

One thing you can be sure of is that when they get to it, the job will be thorough and essentially an up-to-the-minute update (read latst post) at that point. The Staff works very hard on such detailed things and with the addition of Thomas Matthews to the already superb staff the update should go smoothly. The SITS are big and only SVC knows when he will start them.

One note is that the basic SITs that accompanied F&E 2010 basic set were checked for accuracy when that product came out.

By James Wood (Jwood314) on Sunday, May 02, 2010 - 05:42 pm: Edit

I wasn't complaining, just confused and wanted verification on which SITs sets to use. Say SITs sets 10 time really fast.

Cheers,
James

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, May 13, 2010 - 07:45 am: Edit

Federation MPAL (F111) Factors 0(9H) Thomas Mathews 13 May 2010. Current factors read 9H0 which is not consistent with other Monitor Pallets and Tug Pods of similar function.

Federation MPAL (F111) Cost 5+9 Thomas Mathews 13 May 2010. Fighter Cost for Monitor pallet is not consistant with the the MPAL (V) and MPAL (SCS) for the Federation. Fighters are paid at the base rate, see (519.421).

By Robert Padilla (Zargan) on Friday, July 02, 2010 - 12:29 pm: Edit

By the SITs (all racial SITs), APTs have a salvage value of 0.2 EP, but PTRs have a salvage value of 0. Shouldn't the PTR generate salvage if the APT does? It's basically just a beefed up version of an APT, so I would think it's salvage value should be 0.4 EP.

By Peter D Bakija (Bakija) on Monday, July 05, 2010 - 09:03 pm: Edit

The F+E 2K10 rulebbok general unit SIT has PDUs listed as paying 1 point per fighter factor instead of .5 per fighter factor (i.e. a PDU is listed as costing 4+6 instead of the 4+3 it used to cost).

This is just a misprint, correct? And PDUs still cost 4+3 (or whatever, depending on how the PDU is being built)?

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, July 05, 2010 - 10:32 pm: Edit

Peter, which page of the 2010 SITs are you looking at? If you are looking at the PDU listed on the Federation page, page 157, Rev 0, (This is first printing of the 2010 Rule book), then you are seeing the cost of a late war Federation PDU with double the number of fighters, i.e. 12 instead of 6. This is not incorrect, but added as a convenience to players playing the base 2010 game only. Note the YIS date for this PDU is Y181.

By Peter D Bakija (Bakija) on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 09:43 am: Edit

Yes, issue resolved. I foolishly was assuming that the first SIT on pg 159 was the general unit SIT and didn't notice that it was the Fed SIT. Never mind.