There is an online electronic SITS for just the F&E 2010 units. Its in the F&E 2010 topic, I use it all the time.

By Richard Biggs (Richinq) on Saturday, July 23, 2011 - 02:03 am: Edit

Hi,

I am doing a mini F&E Campaign set in Y150 using SFB for the battles. I am using the Klingon C4B from CL20.

Are there any F&E details for this ship.

Many Thanks

Rich.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, July 24, 2011 - 08:22 am: Edit

Federation Heavy Cruisers: COV: Notes: suggest adding "limit of 1 in service". The OOB states that COVs may only be built as a replacement if the original COV is lost. Thomas Mathews 24 July 2011

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, July 24, 2011 - 09:25 am: Edit

Federation Heavy Cruisers: COV: Notes: suggest adding "limit of 1 in service". The OOB states that COVs may only be built as a replacement if the original COV is lost. Thomas Mathews 24 July 2011 NON CONCUR. The rule is predates the Survey cruiser rules which places no limits on G ship conversions of Survey ships. I think it's self limiting. the ship is more valuable as a Survey or CVL then COV. Ryan J Opel 24 Jul 2011

By Stewart W Frazier (Frazikar2) on Thursday, July 28, 2011 - 06:47 pm: Edit

ISC 2011 SIT - TUG POD - 2VP CR should be '+1' instead of '+2' [G3 ISC N1 (Two battle/carrier pods will not increase the command rating any more than one will.]

By Michael Tisdel (Jtisdel) on Saturday, July 30, 2011 - 01:20 pm: Edit

Regarding format of the SIT documents - does the yellow background rows denote anything or are they there to make reading across easier?

Inquiring minds want to know!

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, July 30, 2011 - 01:36 pm: Edit

easier reading.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, September 26, 2011 - 09:37 pm: Edit

Where are the current Master SIT's located?

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, September 26, 2011 - 11:19 pm: Edit

see the top of this page

By Jose R. Barreto (Jbarreto) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 10:00 am: Edit

There could be an issue with how my windows browser displays this site, but I do not see a link for the most current SITs at the top of this page.

I have been using the ones in the folder named "2008 SITS in new format", adjusting for the 2010 changes as I am become aware of them.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 11:17 am: Edit

Jose, that is correct. However if you have the 2010 rulebook and ISC War, use those SITs over the 2008 versions as they incorporate a lot of the fixes.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 01:34 pm: Edit

I have not had time to update the master sits. We tried having Ryan do it, but my computer constantly crashes when trying to use any excel file he created or modified, so that did not work.

The problem is that there are hundreds if not thousands of posts of "change this to that" virtually none of which include any "justification statement" that I can use to tell if the guy posting the proposed change knows what he's talking about.

We need a process by which the raw data here is compiled and fed to me in bite-size pieces, and I just haven't had time to create such a process, and I won't have time to even think about it before Thanksgiving-CL44-Mongoose.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 07:51 pm: Edit

Sorry but I am not seeing the PDF's at the top of the page for SITs.

I opened up the various folders and found a number of PDF's but I don't think they are all current. Some are from 2008.

I also looked through the master index page and did not find any links.

Thanks for the help.

By Tony L Thomas (Scoutdad) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 08:03 pm: Edit

Scroll up to the top of this page...
Click on the link that takes you to the:
2008 SITs in new format thread.

The pdfs are located there.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - 08:54 pm: Edit

Thanks.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, September 28, 2011 - 09:40 am: Edit

How much would the conversion for a Kzinti SR be from a CD? The CD has the special sensors in the same place as the SR.

How much would the conversion for a Kzinti SRV be from a CD? The CD has the special sensors in the same place as the SRV.

I know both conversions would be unusual.

By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Sunday, October 23, 2011 - 10:35 am: Edit

Klingon DWD(D5WD): Drone Factors shown with incorrect brackets (Used brackets for replacement fighters by mistake). Suggestion: Change to correct brackets. L. Bergen 23 OCT 2011

By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Tuesday, November 01, 2011 - 08:06 pm: Edit

Federation NCD: Drone Factors shown with incorrect brackets (Used brackets for replacement fighters by mistake). Suggestion: Change to correct brackets. L. Bergen 01 Nov 2011

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, December 01, 2011 - 03:43 pm: Edit

F&E 2010 revised SIT Generic Units pg 164 PDU w/PFs Build cost should read 4+3+1.5. The cost of the PFs was inadvertently left off. Thomas Mathews 1 Dec 2012

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 07:38 am: Edit

Romulan FHC Build Cost: 13 The FH costs 8 and Survey Ships add 5 across the board per empire. Thomas Mathews 6 Dec 2011

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 07:15 pm: Edit

Romulan FHC: Conversion cost from FH should be 5, not 4. Survey ship conversions (including modular SP to SPS) consistently cost 5 EP. - Jason E. Schaff 12/6/2011

Romulan FHC: Conversion from SP should be a 7 (not 6) point 2-step conversion. Cost is 3 EP for SP to FH + 5 EP for FH to FHC -1 EP for 2-step. - Jason E. Schaff 12/6/2011

By Stewart W Frazier (Frazikar2) on Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 08:38 pm: Edit

Technically, the FHC is more a NSC (NCA-scout) that can be modified for survey (as the SPC can become the SPS), the survey mods are a separate issue (and cost)...

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 08:45 pm: Edit

The FHC is, by both the current SIT and by the counter (white diamond instead of black diamond) a fully qualified survey ship, as is. I had forgotten this until Turtle pointed it out. Since the FHC was introduced in the same product as the advanced survey rules, I assume that this was a deliberate decision.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, December 08, 2011 - 03:32 am: Edit

I need someone to compile all SIT reports from this point. I need the reports to be checked and corrected to meet the formatting standards.

Any takers?

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, December 08, 2011 - 08:02 am: Edit

I'll take it on. I'll break up the reports by empire when I email them to you.