| Subtopic | Posts | Updated | ||
| ISC SIT Files | 1 | 05/05 03:54pm | |
| Processed ISC SIT Reports | 46 | 05/05 01:37pm | |
| Archive through June 04, 2017 | 25 | 06/04 05:07pm |
| By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar2) on Sunday, June 04, 2017 - 11:45 pm: Edit |
Should this be considered minor as it's supposed to happen at isolated bases??
| By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, June 05, 2017 - 12:11 am: Edit |
Can you cite this source?
| By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Monday, June 05, 2017 - 09:16 am: Edit |
Stewart,
The CW (R13.80) and DW (R13.81) are NOT the system defense ships built at the isolated pacification stations. those ships are the NDD (R13.84)and NFF (R13.85).
The CW and DW designs are Y170 designs that construction didn't start building until Y187.
| By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar2) on Monday, June 05, 2017 - 08:54 pm: Edit |
Ack, hazy memory + late night = missed connections ...
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, July 05, 2017 - 11:48 am: Edit |
Dreadnaughts: CVA: For DN: 23+24 should be 22+24. The CVA has 2 PPDs, not 4. Cost would 17 for DN + 4 for CVA + 1 for 2xPPD = 22. Thomas Mathews 5 Jul 2017
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, July 05, 2017 - 11:51 am: Edit |
CA Heavy Cruisers: CV: From CAT: 2+12. Missing Conversion. Thomas Mathews 5 Jul 2017
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, July 05, 2017 - 06:00 pm: Edit |
CA Heavy Cruisers:
BCS: From BCV 2+¶ should read: 3+¶. Converting a ship to PFT functions costs 3 plus EW if any plus the cost of the PFs themselves. Thomas Mathews 5 July 2017
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, July 05, 2017 - 06:13 pm: Edit |
DCS: From CA 5+12+¶ should read: 7+12+¶. Converting a ship to a SCS type costs 2 for the carrier plus 3 for the PFT function plus 2 for the EW plus fighters plus the cost of the PFs themselves. Thomas Mathews 5 July 2017
DCS: From CAT 5+12+¶ should read: 7+12+¶. Converting a ship to a SCS type costs 2 for the carrier plus 3 for the PFT function plus 2 for the EW plus fighters plus the cost of the PFs themselves. Thomas Mathews 5 July 2017
DCS: From CV 3+¶ should read: 5+¶. Converting a ship to PFT functions costs 3 plus 2 for EW plus the cost of the PFs themselves. Thomas Mathews 5 July 2017
DCS: From CVS 3+¶ should read: 5+¶. Converting a ship to PFT functions costs 3 plus 2 for EW plus the cost of the PFs themselves. Thomas Mathews 5 July 2017
| By Rob Padilla (Zargan) on Thursday, August 24, 2017 - 05:46 pm: Edit |
| By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, August 07, 2019 - 03:03 pm: Edit |
DELETED; IRRELEVANT.
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, March 04, 2020 - 12:08 pm: Edit |
Page 2 CE to be consistent should not "From CL, CM, or CS: 1" be "From CL/CM/CS: 1"
Page 2 CLS (HSC) to be consistent should not "From CL, CM, or CS: 4" be "From CL/CM/CS: 4"
Page 3 HDW-R "From HDW: 1+FOP DD: 2+1+FOP" should be "From HDW: 1+FOP From DD: 2+1+FOP"
Page 4 "POLICE SHIP" should be "POLICE SHIPS"
Page 5 FTL "(521.23): 6 (1/yr)" should be "(521.23): 6 (1/year)"
Page 7 STX "From BTS: 12.5+10.5+PF From STB: 8+6XTP+PF From BSX: 9.5+7.5 XTP+PF From BTS: 8+6XTP+PF" should be "From BTS: 12.5+10.5+PFs From STB: 8+6XTP+PFs From BSX: 9.5+7.5 XTP+PFs From BTS: 8+6XTP+PFs"
Page 7 SBX "BTX: 25.5+ 22.5XTP+6+PFs" should be "BTX: 25.5+22.5XTP+6+PFs"
Page 8 PSBX "From PSTX: 24.5+ 20.5XTP+6+PFs" should be "From PSTX: 24.5+20.5XTP+6+PFs"
Page 8 PSBX "PSX: 25.5.5+25.5+6+PFs" should be "PSX: 25.5+25.5+6+PFs"
Page 8 To be consistent "Planetary Installations" should be "Planetary Units"
Page 8 PGB "From PGB (441.3)" should be "From PGB: (441.3)"
Page 9 "ADM 'STAR'" should be "ADM "STAR' (Admiral)" to be consistent
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 08, 2020 - 01:07 pm: Edit |
Page 7 The bases are not listed in the same format as the other SITS ("SB" vs "SB(N) (No fighters)"
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 08, 2020 - 01:46 pm: Edit |
Page 9 "ADM *" should be "ADM * (Admiral)" to be consistent.
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 - 08:29 pm: Edit |
ISC SAS - To match convention "Small Auxiliary Scout; (2EW)" should be "Small Auxiliary Scout; (EW=2)"
| By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, March 25, 2020 - 01:53 pm: Edit |
ISC SAH "Small Auxuliary Carrier with heavy fighters." should be "Small Auxiliary Carrier with heavy fighters."
ISC PSX "X-version of Pacificiation Battle Station;" should be "X-version of Pacification Battle Station;"
ISC PS "Pacificiation Battle Station; Module Limits 2FTM and PFM" should be "Pacification Battle Station; Module Limits 2FTM and PFM"
ISC LAS Should not "Large Auxiliary Scout; (3EW) (317.1)" be "Large Auxiliary Scout; (EW=3) (317.1)"
ISC LAP Should not "Large Auxiliary PFT (526.4); scout (2EW)." be "Large Auxiliary PFT (526.4); scout (EW=2)."
ISC CSF For consistency should not "Medium Carrier, Improved variant From CVL: 2+3 From CVLS: 1+3" be "Medium Carrier, Improved variant. Additional Conversions: From CVL: 2+3 From CVLS: 1+3."
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, May 25, 2020 - 05:44 pm: Edit |
ISC: LTT Pods: LHP: TYPO: the designation should read LHF (not LHP) per SSD. CORRECT Factors: 0[8]/none should be 0[8H]/none. The pod is a heavy fighter resupply pod not a standard fighter resupply pod. Thomas Mathews 25 May 2020
ISC: LTT Pods: LSP: YIS: Blank should be Y176. G3 Gives YIS date of Y176 for the scout pod used on LTTs. Thomas Mathews 25 May 2020
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, May 25, 2020 - 06:00 pm: Edit |
ISC: Destroyer Alternatives: DW: YIS: Blank should be Y187. G3 gives a YIS date of Y187 for the DW. Thomas Mathews 25 May 2020
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, May 25, 2020 - 06:03 pm: Edit |
ISC: Dreadnought Alternatives: DNW: YIS: Blank should be Y180. G3 gives an arbitrary YIS date of Y180. Thomas Mathews 25 May 2020
| By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, June 29, 2020 - 06:36 am: Edit |
ISC: Jumbo Auxiliaries: JAP: YIS Y170 should be Y182. Y182 is PF2 for the ISC. Thomas Mathews 30 Jun 2020
| By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, August 23, 2020 - 06:43 pm: Edit |
ISC HDWs: The construction costs for the several of the ISC HDWs needs to be corrected. Ref:
Recommend correcting the following BUILD COSTS to read:
Quote:(525.211) If a HDW is built configured for any mission (525.23) except K-Combat, the cost of the reconfiguration is paid at the time of construction.
| By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, August 23, 2020 - 07:30 pm: Edit |
ISC HWXs: The X-ship designations (shaded in green) are all incorrect. All HDW X-ship designators start with 'HWX' followed by the designator suffix.
All base hull and size data should more correctly read: HWX(4).
All conversion entries should correctly read as: 'From HWX:'
FEDS - 23 AUG 2020
| By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Monday, March 08, 2021 - 05:05 pm: Edit |
ISC PFT should be Y183 based on the G3 availability date and the correction of the PF1 date to Y182F in CL40. Ryan J Opel 8 Mar 2021
| By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, September 10, 2023 - 06:29 pm: Edit |
HDWT: Delete U from SIT, HDWT do not qualify per (535.23T) Ryan J Opel 10 Sep 23
| Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |