Subtopic | Posts | Updated |
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 08:25 pm: Edit |
REPORTS PROCESSED TODAY
Gorn Battleships: BB(-): ADD new line: Ref 17; Factors 20/10; Y175 (436.0); Size BB(2); Conv: From BB/V/S: 2; Build Special 36+6; Salv 9.000 (36 x 25%); Notes: Base Hull (BB) Battleship without fighters, Conjectural. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC: I think your 36+6 is wrong, and that’s the cost of the one with fighters.
Gorn Battleships: BB: Command rating is 9, should be 10 like other BBs. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Concurs with CR10. SVC agrees.
Gorn Battleships: BB: Factors 20(3)/10(1.5); Y175 (436.0); Size BB(2); Conv: From BB-: 0+6; Build Special 36+6; Salv 9.000 (36 x 25%); Notes: Base Hull (BB) Battleship, Conjectural. Single Ship Carrier. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC Other than the conversion from the new BB- all of this was already there.
Gorn Battleships: BBL: ADD new line: Ref A9; Factors 18F(3)/9(1.5); CL41; CR10; Y175 (436.0); Size BBL(2); Conv NA; Build Special 34+6; Salv 8.500 (34 x 25%); Notes: Fast Raiding Battleship Variant, Conjectural. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC Already there.
Gorn Battleships: BBS: Factors 20(6)P/10(3)P; Y175 (436.0); Size BB(2); Conv: From BB: 5+6; From BBV: 5; From BB- 5+12; Build Special 41+12+PFs; Salv 9.000 (36 x 25%); Notes: Battleship Stellar Domination Ship Variant, Conjectural. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC most of this date was already present. Date is wrong as PFs not available then.
Gorn Battleships: BBV: Factors 20(12)/10(6); Y175 (436.0); Size BB(2); Conv: From BB: 4+18; Build Special 38+24; Salv 9.000 (36 x 25%); Notes: Battleship Heavy Carrier Variant, Conjectural. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC data already present.
Gorn Dreadnoughts: ADD new category DREADNOUGHTS (SPECIAL CONVERSIONS). Move the DND, DNC, and DNM to this new category. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC thinks this is unnecessary window dressing.
Gorn Dreadnoughts: DNE: RECOMMEND factors 12-14/6-7; Schedule: 18; salv 4.500 STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC Added.
Gorn Heavy Battlecruisers: BCH: Conversion cost from CL should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CL>BC>BCH=3+3-1=5 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC OK.
Gorn Heavy Battlecruisers: BCS: Change conversion "From CVS: (4?) (3?)" to "From CVS: 3". This conversion is part of the two-step conversion CV>CVS>BCS listed in (437.1). Since per the SIT CV>CVS>BCS=5 and CV>CVS=3, I derived CVS>BCS=3 [3+3-1=5]. Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC ok.
Gorn Heavy Battlecruisers: BCS: Conversion cost from CV should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CV>CVS>BCS=3+3-1=5 (minor). The CVS to BCS conversion is listed on the SIT as "(4?) (3?)". I assumed a cost of 3 since the CV>CVS>BCS conversion cost on the SIT is 5 [3+3-1=5]. Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC ok.
Gorn Heavy Battlecruisers: BCV: Conversion cost from BC should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). BC>BCH>BCV=3+[2+12]-1=4+12 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. Ok. SVC ok.
Gorn Heavy Battlecruisers: BCV: Conversion cost from CV should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CV>CVS>BCV=3+3-1=5 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC ok.
Gorn Battlecruisers: BF: Conversion cost from CL should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CL>BC>BF=3+3-1=5 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs.
Gorn Battlecruisers: CCH: Conversion cost from CL should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CL>BC>CCH=3+2-1=4 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC OK.
Gorn Battlecruisers: CV(3CV): This carrier group should be in the Gorn LIGHT CRUISERS section and not in the Gorn BATTLECRUISERS section. No component of this group is based on the Gorn BC hull, but the two major components are based on the Gorn CL hull. That is the Gorn CV and CLE. Graham Wardle 14.7.09. STRONG: CONCURS. SVC Moved.
Gorn Battlecruisers: CVS: Conversion cost from CL should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). CL>BC>CVS=3+[2+12]-1=4+12 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC done.
Gorn Battle Destroyers: BDP: Conversion cost from SC should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). SC>BDS>BDP=3+3-1=5 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC done.
Gorn Battle Destroyers: BDSX: ADD conversion From BD: 8 STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC ok, wondered if this was a double conversion.
Gorn Battle Destroyers: BDSX: DD>BDX>BDSX=[6‡]+3-1=8 [currently SIT cost is 7]. Two-step conversions should get a 1 EP discount (437.2). This two-step conversion includes another two-step conversion (DD>BDX) so maybe it should not get another 1 EP discount and should cost 9? Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs; the conversion from DD should cost 9; [DD>BD(2)>BDX(5) -1 Discount] then BDX>BDSX(3). SVC agrees with 9.
Gorn Battle Destroyers: BDSX: SC>BDS>BDSX=3+5-1=7 [currently SIT cost is 6]. Two-step conversions should get a 1 EP discount (437.2). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs; conversion should cost 7. SVC ok.
Gorn Gunboat Flotillas: CPF: Conversion cost listed as "—NA—" instead of "None" like other CPF's. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Whatever. SVC whatever.
Gorn Gunboat Flotillas: CPX: Conversion cost listed as "—NA—" instead of "None" like other CPX's. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Whatever. SVC whatever.
Gorn Heavy Destroyers: HDM or MDH: Suggest deleting one of these as they are the same ship scheduled for NO product release. Note the line item for MDH has stats listed and may have appeared with other conjectural maulers in CLog. - L. Bergen 4 April 2010 STRONG: DELETE entire HDM line near top; CHANGE MDH designation to now read "HDM". SVC ok.
Gorn Large Auxiliaries: ASC: SFB Ref# is "R1.31" but all other ASC's its just "31" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC thinks all R1 numbers should have R1.
Gorn Large Auxiliaries: FTL: SFB Ref # is "R1.19" while other FTL's are just "19" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC thinks all R1 numbers should have R1.
Gorn Large Auxiliaries: LAP: SFB Ref # has "R1.27 B" instead of just "27B" like most other LAP's - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC thinks all R1 numbers should have R1.
Gorn Large Auxiliaries: LAV: SFB Ref # has "R1.13 B" instead of just "13B" like most other LAV's - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC thinks all R1 numbers should have R1.
Gorn Medium Cruisers: CMF: HD>CM>CMF=3+2-1=4 (minor) [currently SIT cost is 5 (minor)]. Two-step conversions should get a 1 EP discount (437.2). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC Ok.
Gorn Medium Cruisers: CMV: Conversion cost from HD should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). HD>CM>CMV=3+[2+12]-1=4+12 (minor). Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC ok.
Gorn Medium Cruisers: MCC: Conversion cost from HD should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). HD>CM>MCC=3+1=4 (minor); [no -1 discount per SIT ruling posted on 26 Jan 08]. Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. SVC non-concur. The entry is specifically marked "unusual conversion cost confirmed" (which is presumably thee as the result of a full-court staff review) and I’m going to need a lot more than this to change it.
Gorn Medium Cruisers: MSR: Conversion cost from HDS should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). This is basically the same as a HD>CM>MSR=3+5=7 conversion but with a 2 EP deduction on the CM>MSR for starting as a HDS which makes it minor conversion costing 5. Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs – minor conversion. SVC Ok, but makes note that we need to declare a symbol for minor conversion before doing any more empires, which is why I should not have been sent the next empire until this one was finished.
Gorn Medium Cruisers: MSRV: Conversion cost from HDS should have "(minor)" added since both sub-steps of the two-step conversion each cost 3 EPs or less (437.21). This is basically the same as a HD>CM>MSRV=3+[5+4]-1=7+4 conversion but with a 2 EP deduction on the CM>MSRV for starting as a HDS which makes it minor conversion costing 5+4. Jeff Coutu 19 January 09 STRONG: Concurs. Added new symbol (triangle, point down) for this.
Gorn Mobile Support Units: APT: SFB Ref# is "R1.8", all other APTs just "8" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC concurs that anything from R1 should be marked R1.
Gorn Mobile Support Units: OPB: Notes have additional text "Module Limits two FTM or one FTM+1 PFM ." but no other races have this. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However when we do any bases we should include the module limitations in the notes section. SVC Whatever.
Gorn Mobile Support Units: Prime Teams: Listed under "MOBILE SUPPORT UNITS" when most races have these under "MARKERS AND SPECIAL UNITS" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: RECOMMENDATION - move Prime Team listing to "MARKERS AND SPECIAL UNITS". SVC: done, however, all future reports including the word "race" will be rejected as not understood.
Gorn Mobile Support Units: SAF: SFB Ref # is "R1.33" instead of "33" like other empires. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC changed to R1.33
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MON: SFB Ref # has "R1.22" when most others just have "22" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009, STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. R1.22 is correct.
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MPAL (SCS): SFB Ref # is "R1.22 E" when most other races have it as "22E" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.22E is correct.
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(CV): SFB Ref # is "R1.22 E" when most other races have it as just "22E" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.22E is correct.
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(PFT): All other races call these "MPAL (PF)" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Recommend using MPAL (PF). SVC report includes the word RACE which I do not understand. No action taken.
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(PFT): Conversion cost is "None" instead of "—NA—" like all other races MPAL (PF)'s - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Whatever. SVC report rejected due to unknown term RACE.
Gorn Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(PFT): Salvage is 0 when all other races MPAL(PF)'s its 0.75 - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: RECOMMEND salvage at 0.750. SVC Like I care?
Gorn Planetary Units: C-BASE: Build Cost or Substitution listed as "NA" instead of "—NA—" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Whatever. SVC done.
Gorn Planetary Units: Colony: Cost stated (446.13) 2+2+2 should read (446.13) 1+1+1 Cost changed in Captain's Log 37 Thomas Mathews 26 Aug 2009 STRONG: Concurs. SVC done.
Gorn Planetary Units: PDU: SFB Ref # is "R1.14" when all other races it as just "14" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.14 is correct.
Gorn Planetary Units: PGB: SFB Ref # is "R1.14" when all other races it as just "14" - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.14 is correct.
Gorn Police Frigates: ADD new line: Designation: PBF (BFF); ref 83; factors 4-5/None; product NO?; CR3; Y167; hull POL(4); Conv From POL: 1; build For POL: 3; Salv 0.000; Notes: Police Battle Frigate. STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC added, good addition. But should it be FF(4) instead of POL(4)?
Gorn Police Frigates: CHANGE Category Title to "POLICE SHIPS" as Gorn Police units are based on frigate (POL/PV) and destroyer hulls (FLG). STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC ok, sure, whatever.
Gorn Police Frigates: FLG: CHANGE "From FF: 3" to "From POL: 3". ADD From DD: 2 (the FLG is built on a DD hull not a FF hull). STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC if it is built on a DD hull it should not have FROM POL at all.
Gorn Police Frigates: POL: No Build Cost - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: CHANGE designation to read POL (FF). ADD build For: DD/BD: 2.5 (4 point frigates cost 2.5 to build not 3 EP) SVC somebody built one on purpose?
Gorn Police Frigates: PV: CHANGE: Designation to read PV (FFV); size POL(4); "From FF" to "From POL"; "For FF/DD: 4+6" to "For DD/BD: 3.5+6". (4 point frigates cost 2.5 plus 1 EP for carrier conversion.) STRONG – 8 Jan 2012 SVC I think I got all of that.
Gorn Police Frigates: PV: No Call Up cost like the police ships. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: ADD "Call up: 3"; per (531.41). Ok, I think.
Gorn Repair Docks: FRD: SFB Ref# is "R1.10" when it should be just "10" like other empires FRD's. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.10 is correct.
Gorn Repair Docks: FRD+: SFB Ref# is "R1.10" when it should be just "10" like other empires FRD's. - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC R1.10 is correct.
Gorn Small Auxiliaries: SAP: SFB Ref # is "R1.27 A" instead of "27A" like other empires - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC In future I need a simple note to change that whole section to R1.
Gorn Small Auxiliaries: SAV: SFB Ref # is "R1.13 A" instead of "13A" like other empires - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED. However, for professional consistency (yes – I can hear Jean on the other line…) we should use R1.XX whenever we reference any unit listed in the SFB General R-sections (R1.0); stand-alone numbers should only reference the empire’s own R-section. SVC This is getting repetitive and tedious, and I am being overcome by ennui.
Gorn Tugs and Pods: REP POD: Conversion cost as "NA" instead of "—NA—" like other empires - Eric S. Smith 1 Jan 2009 STRONG: Okay….so Eric has a lot of time on his hands… SVC Confused as it already says —NA—.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, April 06, 2015 - 04:59 pm: Edit |
THINGS DONE
=========
=========
Gorn battle Destroyers: BFR: 'Conversion' & 'Build' costs conflict with 'Factors On Counter'. Confirm [6] or [8] fighters and make cost to match. This ship has not yet been released in an ADB product to my knowledge. Rom SKR cost issue is similar and may be related. Andrew Bruno, 2 Feb 2012
STRONG: [8] is correct per R6.A8 from CL36; From BD: 1+8; From DD‡: 2+8; For BD: 5+8.
SVC: DONE
===
Gornn: Gunboat Flotillas: CPF: Cost (524.112) 3 The cost listed under (524.112) specifically states that a causual PF group costs 3 EPs. Thomas Mathews 12 Dec 2012
SVC: DONE
===
Gorn: Gunboat Flotillas: CPX: Cost (524.112) 3 The cost listed under (524.112) specifically states that a causual PF group costs 3 EPs. Thomas Mathews 12 Dec 2012
SVC: DONE
===
Gorn: Heavy Destroyers: HSV: YIS: Y179 (530.223) states that the Gorns recieve their heavy fighters on turn 22, Spring of Y179. There would not be any early prototypes for Heavy Fighter Carriers. Thomas Mathews 1 Jan
STRONG: Change YIS to Y179.
SVC: DONE
===
Gorn BCS: Crippled fighters should be 1t (t=triangle) as its uncrippled is 3. Eric Smith 6 JAN 2013
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: DONE
===
Large Aux: Gorn ASC: Recommend removing note (526.46) from notes column, it is already in the substitution column - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: DOES NOT CONCUR, NO CHANGE.
===
Gorn BATS: Change notes column to "Battlestation. See EW Chart. Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM & 1PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: EXISTING NOTE IS BETTER, CORRECTED ONE CHARACTER IN EXISTING NOTE.
===
Gorn BS: Change notes to "Base Station. See (444.0). Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM & 1PFM. See EW Chart." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: EXISTING NOTE IS BETTER, CORRECTED ONE CHARACTER IN EXISTING NOTE. ADDED EW CHART NOTE.
===
Gorn BSX: Change notes to "X-Base Station. See (444.0). See EW Chart. Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM & 1PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: EXISTING NOTE IS BETTER
===
Gorn BTX: Change notes to "X-Battlestation; see EW Chart. Module Limits: 2FTM & 1PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: EDITED THE TWO NOTES TOGETHER.
I SUSPECT WE’RE GOING TO BE EVOLVING AND EDITING THESE BASE NOTES FOR YEARS. Indeed, when I tried to do Chuck’s omnibus report, I suddenly realized we were all doing this all wrong. Major rethink to follow.
===
Gorn FRD+: Change notes to "See (441.433) With fighter modules; (421.0) without." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: DONE
===
Large Aux: Gorn FTL: Change build cost to "(521.23): 6 (1/yr)". - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: DONE
===
Suddenly realized we need to look at every empire’s auxes because being common hulls all will convert to each other but the cost is unclear.
===
Gorn FTM (Fighter- Module): Change designation to "FTM (Ftr-Module)" to make more sense. Change conversion cost to "None" to match the other empires. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: title already FTM, changed others to -na-
===
Gorn Ftr-Depot: Change conversion cost to "None" to match the other empires. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: changed others to -na-
===
Large Aux: Gorn LAP: Change conversion cost to "From LAS: 3" to match ISC War. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: plus PFs.
===
Gorn MB: ALL BASE CHANGES ON HOLD.
===
Gorn MON: Change conversion cost to "None" to match all other empires. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: changed others to -na-
===
Gorn MPAL (CV): Change conversion cost to "None" to match other empires. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: changed others to -na-
===
Gorn MPAL (PFT): Change designation to "MPAL (PF)" to match other empires. Change conversion cost to "None" to match other empires and pallets. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: changed others to -na-; others should be PFT as this is a PFT not a PF and the fightr module is CV not FTR.
===
Gorn MPAL (SCS): Change conversion cost to "None" to match other empires and pallets. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: changed others to -na-
===
Gorn OPB: ALL BASE CHANGES ON HOLD.
===
Gorn PAM (Power Augmentation Module): Change designation to "PAM (Power Augmentation Module)" for consistency. Change conversion cost to "None" to match other empires. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: new standard is PAM (Power Augment Module).
changed others to -na-
===
Gorn PFM (Gunboat Module): Change designation to "PFM (PF Module)" for consistency.
SVC new standard is PFM (Gunboat Module)
Change conversion cost to "None" to match other empires.
SVC Changed others to -na-
Change build cost to "(441.412): 2+PFs" for consistency. Change notes to "PF module for base or FRD." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: done
===
Large Aux: Gorn REPR: Change notes to "Repair ship; See (422.0).". - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: Repair ship; See (422.0).
===
Gorn STB: ALL BASES ON HOLD,
===
All SIT's except the Gorns list ships by hull type then YIS.. Gorns do not which make searching for what is available awkward.
SVC: FIXED
===
Gorn LAV: Available date can not be earlier than Y169S with is Fighter Introduction date for the Gorns. Ryan J Opel 15 May 14
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: Y169 OK
===
Gorn SAV: Available date should be same as LAV i.e no earlier than Y169S. Ryan J Opel 15 May 14
STRONG: CONCURS.
SVC: IT WAS Y173 BUT NOW Y169
===
Gorn DNC: Change note to read "Only one conversion per year (706.3)." (Currently reads one conversion per turn). Per 706.3 and 525.84 conversions to DNC are limited to one per year. Patrick Sledge 3 FEB 15.
STRONG: Yes -- one per year is correct.
SVC: done.
===
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, April 10, 2015 - 03:50 pm: Edit |
BTX(FP): CORRECT TYPO as the crippled fighter factor of the base should read (3) not (6). Strong - 9 APR 2015
DONE
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, April 10, 2015 - 05:03 pm: Edit |
All fixed, but won't appear to the next round.
CPF Lists Y183(A); should just be listed Y183. Gorn CPFs are available of PF3 per (524.11) which is Y183. Note — there is no reason to ever list a “spring” modifier date “A”; if a unit becomes available in the spring, then by definition it is available for the entire year. (Unless there is something I have not been informed of.)
CFX Lists Y183(A); should just be listed Y183. Gorn CPFs are available of PF3 per (524.11) which is Y183.
FRD+ Lists Y165; should just be listed Y169. The FRD+ uses Gorn FTM with Fighter introduction date (G-8) per G3A & R6.F5 as Y169.
BTX(FP) Lists Y182(B); should be Y182. Gorn PF intro date per (600.2) and x-tech from AO (706.0) OOB are both Y182.
STX(FP) Lists Y182(B); should be Y182. Gorn PF intro date per (600.2) and x-tech from AO (706.0) OOB are both Y182.
SBX(FP) Lists Y182(F); should be Y182. Gorn PF intro date per (600.2) and x-tech from AO (706.0) OOB are both Y182.
MPAL-V Lists Y173; should just be listed Y169. Gorn fighter introduction date (G-8) per G3A & R6.F5 is Y169.
FTM Lists Y165; should just be listed as Y169. Gorn fighter introduction date (G-8) per G3A & R6.F5 is Y169.
PFM Lists Y182(B); should just be listed Y182. Date per (600.2) is Y182.
HFM Date is blank; should just be listed as Y179. Gorn Heavy Fighter date per AO (706.0) OOB is Y179.
HPM Lists Y182(B); should just be listed Y178. Date per (441.5) is Y178.
PDU Lists Y173; should just be listed Y169. Gorn fighter introduction date (G-8) per G3A & R6.F5 as Y169.
By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, October 19, 2013 - 06:32 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 April 2017
Gorn: Medium Cruisers: MCC: Cost: None should read Cost: 9 Other empires can build command versions of their NCAs. Thomas Mathews 19 Oct
STRONG: Concurs with SIT date Y165.
Gorn: Medium Cruisers: MCC: conversion cost from HD should read For CM: 9 Thomas Mathews 19 Oct
STRONG: Concurs. Add minor conversion down arrow for From HD‡ 4; HD+3>CM+1>MCC. The note for unusual cost can be removed. This was a legacy of the time we didn't fully define two-step conversion costs where any one step was equal to 1 EP. If any step of a two step conversion is one or less, then there is no discount but it is still considered a two-step conversion for determining if the overall two-step conversion is considered a minor conversion.
By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Sunday, January 12, 2014 - 10:47 am: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
Gorn CMF: Available date should be Y173 (not Y175). Rationale: The SFB Master Ship Chart YIS is 173. - Jason E. Schaff 01/12/2014
STRONG: CONCURS.
Gorn DDT: Available date should be Y129 (not Y175). Rationale: The SFB Master Ship Chart YIS is 129. - Jason E. Schaff 01/12/2014
STRONG: CONCURS.
By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:46 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
Monitors & Pallets: MPAL (PFT): Cost: (519.422) 5+Pi symbol should be 5+PFs. Replace Pi symbol with PFs. Thomas Mathews 26 Feb 2017
Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(SCS): Cost: 5+6 should be 5+6+PFs. The cost of the PFs is missing from the actual cost of the pallet. Thomas Mathews 26 Feb 2017
By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:51 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
MMG. Change availability to Y132. In notes Free MMGs available per (321.11) during General War. This is a rule change in (657.432). Ryan J Opel 26 Feb 2017
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:03 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
BB Cost for fighters missing when built, should be(436.0): 36 + 6 - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-01
BB- Note missing text about conjectural status- " Conjectural Battleship without fighters." - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-01
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:04 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
DNH Note doesn't include early versions text and not consistent with other DNH hull text. Suggest (lifted from UFP)- "Heavy Variant of DN. No early variants." - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-01
Items in pink are known to be missing data and no reports should be sent. The staff will work up the data when they can.
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:04 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
HAA factors are shown as "3-8-1-4" instead of "3-8/1-4" suspect this has propagated through several other (all?) SITS. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
ASC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
HAP item fixed earlier
LAP item fixed earlier
SAP item fixed earlier
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:05 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
SDS Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
SCS Conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
MDS Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
======
LINE ITEM UNCLEAR, NOTHING DONE.
BFR Conversion cost for FTR is "+6" should be "From BD: 5+8" - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-01
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:05 pm: Edit |
CLEARED, 9 APRIL 2017
MPAL (SCS) Build cost for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03--DONE
Multiple "+PFS" used in several places instead of glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 NO, THERE AREN'T ANY.
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:06 pm: Edit |
DONE 9 APRIL 2017
CCH "From BC:2" in conversion column needs space- "From BC: 2" - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-01
By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, April 08, 2015 - 07:23 pm: Edit |
DONE 21 APRIL 2017
Gorn DN: RECOMMEND that a conversion from NCC (ship notes in CL50 says the idea was that NCCs be convertible to DNs) be added. I do not know how much it should cost (at least 5?). Richard Eitzen – 8 APR 2015
STRONG: Only ADB can make that call. If ADB approves the concept then, if asked, I will make a recommendation for their consideration and approval.
By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 09, 2017 - 07:24 pm: Edit |
DONE 26 APRIL 2017
Battle Destroyers: BFR: Factors: 2-6[8] Escort Symbol/1-3 should be: 2-6[6] Escort Symbol/1-3. Incorrect number of spare fighters carried. Thomas Mathews 9 Apr 2017
Battle Destroyers: BFR: Conversion Cost,Source: From: BD: 1+8 should be 1+6. Spare Fighters on FCRs cost 1 EP per factor. Thomas Mathews 9 Apr 2017
Battle Destroyers: BFR: Conversion Cost,Source: From: DD: 2+8 should be 2+6. Spare Fighters on FCRs cost 1 EP per factor. Thomas Mathews 9 Apr 2017
By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 09, 2017 - 08:59 pm: Edit |
ALREADY DONE EARLIER
Battle Destroyers: BFR: Conversion Cost,Source: From: DD: 2+8 should be 2+6. Spare Fighters on FCRs cost 1 EP per factor. Thomas Mathews 9 Apr 2017
This replaces the last line item from my post: By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 09, 2017 - 07:24 pm: Edit. I missed the two step conversion.
By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Sunday, April 09, 2017 - 09:46 pm: Edit |
NOBODY SEEMS TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER. THE DD-BASED FCR HAS 5 CARGO BOXES AND 12 FIGHTERS (6 FACTORS). THE BDD-BASED FCR HAS 9 CARGO BOXES SO IT COULD HAVE ANYWHERE FROM 16-24 FIGHTERS (8-12 FACTORS). I MADE IT EIGHT FOR NOW SINCE THE COUNTER SAYS EIGHT.
BFR Conversion cost for FTR is "+6" should be "From BD: 5+8" Additional context- counter shown as having [8], conversions show +8 for FTR (consistent with counter listing), build is shown as +6 (six) for 8 FTR FCR factors. If one assumes the counter is correct, the build cost needs fixed. Thomas Mathews has pointed out that the counter listing and conversion costs are wrong while the build cost was right. I yield on what was wrong. Howard Bampton 2017-04-09
By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 07:30 pm: Edit |
DONE: I JUST COPIED THE BLOCK FROM ANOTHER EMPIRE. MUST HAVE GOTTEN ACCIDENTALLY DELETED SOMETIME.
STB(N) In Conversions, add missing conversion “From BS(N): 9”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-20
STB(N) In Conversions, add missing conversion “From BTS(N): 6”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-20
By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, April 23, 2017 - 02:05 pm: Edit |
SHIP ADDED.
Battlecruisres: BCM: Factors: 10+/5. Conversion: From BC: 5, From CL: 7 For BC: 10 Salvage: 2.5. The MCM (CM Mauler) is a 10+/5 unit, the CM and BC are both 10/5 units. Maulers across the empires are 5 points to convert from the CA base hull. Thomas Mathews 23 Apr 2017
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |