ALL FIXED BY CHUCK STRONG 12 MAY 2017

HSP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add four glyphs - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

BWP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add four glyphs - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

NSP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add four glyphs - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

AWP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add four glyphs - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:26 pm: Edit

ALL FIXED BY SVC 12 MAY 2017
ASC factors listed as "1-4P_(6)/0-2P(3)". The "_" should be a special sensor diamond - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

ASC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

LAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

SAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:27 pm: Edit

ALL ITEMS FIXED, MOSTLY SOME TIME AGO
Multiple "+PFS" used in several places instead of glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 NO THERE AREN'T, ALL FIXED LONG AGO.

ADM Build cost is "(316.32): '-". Presumably should be "(316.32): 0" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

PFM Build cost for PFs missing- add glyph (only an issue if new base chart is copied in without being fixed first)- Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 IT IS FIXED ON THE CHART I COPIED. I CHECKED AND NO SIT HAS THIS PROBLEM.

Z-Symbols Used Footer doesn't have glyph for PFs in all cases (this may have been fixed globally now)- Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 YES IT HAS BEEN

By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:30 am: Edit

SENT TO RYAN, WHO REJECTED ALL OF THIS THE LAST TWO TIMES.
BSX In Conversion “From MB/OPB: 13”, change “13” to “16”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

BSX In Conversion “From BS: 9”, change “9” to “12”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

BTX In Conversion “From BS: 12”, change “12” to “15”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

BTX In Conversion “From BTS: 9”, change “9” to “12”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:31 am: Edit

SENT TO RYAN, WHO REJECTED ALL OF THIS THE LAST TWO TIMES.
STX In Conversion “From BTS: 19”, change “19” to “24”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

STX In Conversion “From STB: 13”, change “13” to “18”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

STX In Conversion “From BSX: 13”, change “13” to “15”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

STX In Conversion “From BTX: 10”, change “10” to “12”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:31 am: Edit

SENT TO RYAN, WHO REJECTED ALL OF THIS THE LAST TWO TIMES.
SBX In Conversion “From STB: 46”, change “46” to “58”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

SBX In Conversion “From SB: 24”, change “24” to “36”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

SBX In Conversion “From BTX: 43”, change “43” to “52”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

SBX In Conversion “From STX: 33”, change “33” to “40”. - Jeffrey Coutu 2017-04-24

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 - 02:29 pm: Edit

COPIED INTO FILE EXCEPT FOR THE TYPOS

HS Consider adding to note cross reference to where the EW settings are aka (761.S). "Base Hull (HS); mobile shipyard; scout; EW varies (see (761.S)); 9 repair points; limited tug duties; carries 30 EP; speed-1 slow unit." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

BW Consider adding to note cross reference to where the EW settings are aka (761.S). "Combat Variant - scout; EW varies (see (761.S)); limited tug duties; carries 30 EP; speed-1 slow unit. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

NS Consider adding to note cross reference to where the EW settings are aka (761.S). "Base Hull (NS); mobile shipyard; scout; EW varies (see (761.S)); 6 repair points; limited tug duties; carries 24 EP; speed-1 slow unit." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

AW Consider adding to note cross reference to where the EW settings are aka (761.S). "Combat variant of Nest Ship; scout - EW varies (see (761.S)); 6 repair points; limited tug duties; carries 24 EPs; speed-1 slow unit." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 - 02:29 pm: Edit

ALL FIXED 12 MAY 2017
SR Factors- the unit is a SR, so scout diamond color should be red - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

HWD-Q Factors- the unit is a SR, so scout diamond color should be red - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

DDP (PFT) Note lacks Scout text. Fix: "PF Tender, Scout, EW=2" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 01:36 pm: Edit

ALL CLEARED
Fix EW spacing .................. = NO INSTANCES FOUND
Fix Scout capitalization .................. = THE ONLY TIMES THIS WAS IN THE FILE WAS THE
FOUR HIVE SHIP NOTES THAT HOWARD ADDED
update HDW entries. .................. = DONE
Check auto-date on header. .................. = DONE

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 02:07 am: Edit

THANKS HOWARD!
No double dagger issues spotted in posted SIT.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 11:20 am: Edit

DONE 12 MAY 2017
Standardize HDW variants as HDWZ and HDWX variants as HWXZ.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 01:54 pm: Edit

FIXED TO CHUCK FORMAT 12 MAY 2017
HDW POG build cost missing PFs: "(525.23P): 5+¶" 525.23P notes cost is 5+PFS. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11


HDW FOP build cost should be "(525.23R): 1+5" Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry and allows for free FTR use in purchase. Cost backported from Paravians. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11

HDW HOG build cost should be "(525.23H): 0+14" aka zero to convert and 14 for the heavy FTR factors. Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry. COG notes that free FTR factors can be used to reduce cost (thus the +10 notation). HOG text strongly implies the same. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11

Edit- amended FOP entry after further research.

FEDS: This is the most correct format:

COG: (525.23V): 0+10
FOP: (525.23R): 0+6
HOG: (525.23H): 0+14
POG: (525.23P): 5+¶

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 12, 2017 - 05:35 pm: Edit

New SIT posted, all corrections known were made.

Thanks to Chuck Strong, Ryan Opel, Howard Bampton, and others for all of the help.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, May 12, 2017 - 06:23 pm: Edit

FIXED THE OTHER WAY13 MAY 2017
HS the "(see (761.S)" is missing the 2nd ")". - Howard Bampton 2017-05-12

BW the "(see (761.S)" is missing the 2nd ")". - Howard Bampton 2017-05-12

NS the "(see (761.S)" is missing the 2nd ")". - Howard Bampton 2017-05-12

AW the "(see (761.S)" is missing the 2nd ")". - Howard Bampton 2017-05-12

Sigh.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Friday, May 12, 2017 - 06:31 pm: Edit

done 13 May but that makes it the same as the DNH which it isn't.

LIGHT BATTLESHIP title bar: CHANGE the description on the right as: "(LARGE HULL WITH THREE LARGE BOOMS)"

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Friday, May 12, 2017 - 06:45 pm: Edit

done 13 may 2017
TRIBUNAL SHIPS

SIT CORRECTIONS:

UNIT	Build	Salv
HS	Special: 56	14.000
HSP	-OK-	14.000
BW	Special: 62	14.000
BWP	-OK-	14.000
NS	Special: 42	10.500
NSP	-OK-	10.500
AW	Special: 46	10.500
AWP	-OK-	10.500

Rationale: From ME16.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Saturday, May 13, 2017 - 12:18 pm: Edit

DONE 13 MAY 2017
I REMOVED FOR, BUT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE ADDED IT.
General builds style: Most ships have "M-Hull:" or "S-Hull:" but a minority have "For M-Hull:" (2 instances) or "For S-Hull:" (a handful in the HDW section). Should we remove the "For" for consistency's sake? - Howard Bampton 2017-05-13

DESTROYER AND VARIANTS title bar- missing "(" before "SMALL HULL WITH TWO SMALL BOOMS)" All other instances seem to be correct. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-13

Lisp and your use of ('s and )'s, how I hate thee.