DONE BY CHUCK 18 AUG 2016
DCS: Factors should be 3-9P(6) Sc Symbol/2-5P(3). The DCS replaces the heavy fighters (8H) of the ACS with a full PF flotilla and is identical to the ACS in respects to the weapons carried and used. Thomas Mathews 4 Jun 2016
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, July 10, 2016 - 08:23 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK 2016
SCS crippled fighter factor should be 3, not 6. (Nick Samaras, July 10, 2016
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

By Peter Bakija (Bakija) on Friday, July 15, 2016 - 08:37 am: Edit

ANSWERED BY TURTLE BELOW
I may be misunderstanding what I'm looking at, but the Carnivon Battle Pods seem weird. The SIT lists them as having a rating of 3/none, with a CR addition of +1, and a limit of 4 in service. Presumably, the Carnivon TG uses 2 pods (the CV pod has 3 fighters, so that makes sense). The Carnivon TG has uncrippled factors of 7-8. With 2 Battle Pods, that would make the Carnivon Battle Tug a 13-14? Is this intentional?

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, July 18, 2016 - 06:47 am: Edit

ANSWER TO ABOVE
Peter, I believe that 13-14 is correct for a Carnivon Battle Tug.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, August 18, 2016 - 10:31 am: Edit

DONE BY CHUCK AUG 2016
SCS need conversion from CVA. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

DNL is missing "F" symbol. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

BCV is missing conversion from BCH (placed in the BCS line). (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: NO CHANGE REQUIRED. It's already there on the on-line SIT. 18 Aug 2016

BCS has two conversions from BCH listed; second one is incorrect (belongs to BCV). (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, August 18, 2016 - 12:25 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK AUG 2016
LTT factors listed as 5-6-7N/3-4, should be 5-7N/3-4 or 6-7N/3-4. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: 5-7N is the correct value. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

NCT: Crippled side missing "N", every other NCA variant has it. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)
FEDS: CONCURS. Staff SIT Fixed. 18 Aug 2016

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, August 18, 2016 - 05:35 pm: Edit

FEDS: Note that I fixed the F&E Staff version of the SIT subject to final ADB approval. Once ADB approves the staff version, they will post an updated SIT at their discretion.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, August 18, 2016 - 11:28 pm: Edit

ANSWERED BY CHUCK STRONG BELOW
POL: Should not have a crippled side. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)

POV: Should not have a crippled side. Conversion from POL?(Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)

DWT: Notes don't mention ability to carry a pod. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)

FFT: Notes don't mention ability to carry a pod. (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)

FCR: Has battle group symbol. Some FCRs have this, some do not. What is the official rule? (Nick Samaras, August 18, 2016)

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Friday, August 19, 2016 - 03:43 am: Edit

- Will fix the police ships.
- I don't understand as both the FFT and DWT have a pod "U" haul rating in their factors -- am I missing something?

---

Quote:

(539.72) CARRYING PODs: Most Theater Transports (those with a "U" in the special functions spot on the counter) can carry a single pod or pallet, but none of them can use it (not even to transport EPs or supplies). This could be done to move (for example) a battle pod out of an isolated supply grid and into the main supply grid without using a tug or LTT. A theater transport carrying a heavy pod is considered "overloaded".

The Federation DWT cannot carry a pod and as such does not have a "U" on the counter. The Tholian FCR and 3CPC are theater transports. Two theater transports, working together, can move a mobile base. A theater transport can carry (and deploy) one PDU or one base module.

---

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, September 06, 2016 - 01:51 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK 2016
PFP Pod: Missing scout diamond. (Nick Samaras, September 6, 2016) FEDS fixed the staff SIT.

SCP+ Pod: Missing scout diamond, "/None". (Nick Samaras, September 6, 2016) <FONT COLOR="119911"> FEDS fixed the staff SIT.
</FONT>

VP Pod: Missing "/None". (Nick Samaras, September 6, 2016) FEDS fixed the staff SIT.


BP Pod: extra + on command rating. (Nick Samaras, September 6, 2016) FEDS fixed the staff SIT.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:53 pm: Edit

DONE BY SVC 3 MAY 2017
MMG. Change availability to Y132. In notes Free MMGs available per (321.11) during General War. This is a rule change in (657.432). Ryan J Opel 26 Feb 2017

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:57 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK STRONG 2 MAY 2017
Monitors & Pallets: MP-S: Cost: 5+6 should be 5+6+PFs. The cost of the PFs is missing from the actual cost of the pallet. Thomas Mathews 26 Feb 2017

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 01, 2017 - 07:44 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK STRONG 2 MAY 2017
Carnivons: Light Dreadnaught: DNL: Factors 10-11N/5-6N should be: 10-11FN/5-6N add F for Fast Ship rules to non-crippled side. Thomas Mathews 1 Apr 2017

Carnivons: Frigtates: FFE: Factors: 3-5N escort symbol/2-3N escort symbol should be 3-5 escort symbol/2-3 escort symbol. The frigate and other frigate variants do not have the N symbol for heel nippers. Thomas Mathews 1 Apr 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:30 pm: Edit

FIXED BY CHUCK STRONG 2 MAY 2017
Multiple "+PFS" used in several places instead of glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

MP-S Build costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

ADM Build cost is "(316.32): '-". Presumably should be "(316.32): 0" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:30 pm: Edit

DONE MAY 2017
ASC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

LAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

SAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:31 pm: Edit

DONE 3 MAY 2017
BB YIS should reference (436.0) - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

BB- YIS should reference (436.0) - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

BBV YIS should reference (436.0) - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

BBV YIS date is suspect- most other empires have Y177/Y178 - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

BBS YIS should reference (436.0) - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 11:31 pm: Edit

DONE 3 MAY 2017
NCP - Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

PFP factors seem wrong- "P" for PFs is something else - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 - 02:13 pm: Edit

DONE 3 MAY 2017
BB Hull is conjectural. Adjust note: "Conjectural Base Hull (BB): Single Ship Carrier" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

BB- Hull is conjectural. Adjust note: "Conjectural Battleship without fighters" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

BBV Hull is conjectural. Adjust note: "Conjectural Battleship Heavy Carrier" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

BBS (SDS) Hull is conjectural. Adjust note: "Conjectural Stellar Domination Ship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-25

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 03, 2017 - 04:46 pm: Edit

New Carnie Sit posted. Thanks, Chuck, for all of your hard work.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, May 03, 2017 - 05:26 pm: Edit

ALL DONE 19 MAY 2017
DN: Conversion has Fr_a_m instead of From ' From DN?: 1' - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

SCS: Conversion cost of FTR is overstated (24 for 6 FTR): 'From DN: 5+12+¶' - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

BCS: Conversion cost of FTR is overstated (12 for 3 FTR): From CA‡: 7+6+¶" - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

BCS: Conversion cost of FTR is overstated (12 for 3 FTR): From CC‡: 6+6+¶" - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, May 03, 2017 - 05:26 pm: Edit

ALL DONE 19 MAY 2017
POL Police ships do not have cripped defense values, so factors should be "4/None" - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

POV Police ships do not have cripped defense values, so factors should be "3-4(3)4/None" - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

POL Call-up value of 0 in build cost column is suspect. Staff? - Howard Bamtpon 2017-05-03

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, May 03, 2017 - 05:28 pm: Edit

IT'S MORE OR LESS ARBITRARY, BUT I MADE IT 177

BBV YIS date is suspect- most other empires have Y177/Y178 - Howard Bampton, 2017-04-03 (this one doesn't seem to have been fixed).

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, May 04, 2017 - 01:24 am: Edit

DONE 19 MAY 2017
I need to put /none on the two flag officers

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 01:37 pm: Edit

PROCESSED 19 MAY 2017
Fix EW spacing NONE
Fix Scout capitalization NONE
update HDW entries. DONE
Check auto-date on header. DONE

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 02:04 am: Edit

THANKS
No double dagger issues spotted in posted SIT.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 11:20 am: Edit

DONE 19 MAY 2017
Standardize HDW variants as HDWZ and HDWX variants as HWXZ.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 08:42 pm: Edit

DONE 19 MAY 2017

BCV: Substitution technically for DN/CA. (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017) BETTER THE WAY IT IS.

BCS: Substitution technically for DN/CA. (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017) BETTER THE WAY IT IS.

CC: Build should say "Schedule: 9" (CC is on the production list). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

ACS: Shown CA conversion cost should be from CC instead. A conversion from CA should be added: 6 double-dagger +28+PF. Subsitute for CC, not CA (CC is on the production schedule, this is a CC-based hull). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

HDW-G: needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 08:47 pm: Edit

DONE 19 MAY 2017
CPX: YIS should be Y183 FALL (one turn after CPF). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

MON: YIS should be Y140, not Y168. (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

M-V: YIS should be Y165 (fighter intro date). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

BS(F); YIS should be Y165 (fighter intro date). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

BTS(F); YIS should be Y165 (fighter intro date). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

SB(F); YIS should be Y165 (fighter intro date). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

STF(N): This is listed as SFB(N). YIS should be Y179 (SFB master ship chart). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

STF(F): This is listed as SFB(F). YIS should be Y179 (SFB master ship chart). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

STF(FP): This is listed as SFB(FP). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 08:48 pm: Edit

HFM: Heavy fighter module YIS should be Y178 FALL (heavy fighter date). (Nick Samaras, May 6, 2017)

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Sunday, May 07, 2017 - 09:18 pm: Edit

SENT TO RYAN/CHUCK
Global POL/PV/FLG (but not heavy POL) review cleanup

POL Backporting Paravian style POL call up frequency: Build "Call up: 0 (1/Turn) (531.12)" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07

POV Backporting Paravian style PV call up frequency: Build "Call up: 3 (1/Fall)" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07

POV Backporting Paravian PV Note "Police Light Carrier; See (531.4)" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07

FLG Backporting Paravian style FLG call up frequency: Build "Call up: 2 (1/Spng)" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07

FLG Backporting Paravian style FLG Note "Police Flagship, Commando Ship, Scout, EW=1. See (531.3)." - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 02:02 pm: Edit

FIXED ON EVERY SIT 19 MAY 2017
HDW FOP build cost should be "(525.23R): 1+5" Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry and allows for free FTR use in purchase. Cost backported from Paravians. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS: Per (525.23R), the cost should read "0+6" as "1+5" is incorrect; one is paying for six FCR factors. (This is my fault as I copied the data from another unit and forgot to correct it after cloning it.)

HDW HOG build cost should be "(525.23H): 0+14" aka zero to convert and 14 for the heavy FTR factors. Cost is same, but this makes it consistent with COG entry. COG notes that free FTR factors can be used to reduce cost (thus the +10 notation). HOG text strongly implies the same. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11
FEDS: This is the most correct format:

COG: (525.23V): 0+10
FOP: (525.23R): 0+6
HOG: (525.23H): 0+14
POG: (525.23P): 5+¶