Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Klingon Order of Battle	1		11/21 08:17pm

All items corrected. Topic remains open.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Sunday, June 23, 2019 - 07:33 am: Edit

Good work, Ryan!

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 - 02:25 am: Edit

Klingon Western Fleet: F5S is listed with the Line Ships; it should be with the support ships. (Nick Samaras, June 16, 220).

By John M. Williams (Jay) on Saturday, November 21, 2020 - 09:52 am: Edit

Is the D6D a line ship or a support ship? In the Eastern Fleet and Southern Reserve it's listed as a line ship, but in the Northern Fleet, it's listed as a support ship.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Saturday, November 21, 2020 - 12:41 pm: Edit

They should be on the support line.

FOBS

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Saturday, November 21, 2020 - 08:20 pm: Edit

New Order of Battle posted.

By John M. Williams (Jay) on Monday, January 25, 2021 - 08:57 pm: Edit

Are maulers line ships or support ships? On the Klingon OOB they're line ships. On the Romulan OOB they're support ships. I believe the Romulan entry is correct, which is why I'm posting this here.

By Benjamin Lee Johnson (Jedipilot24) on Friday, July 29, 2022 - 07:58 pm: Edit

According to the “Starship Name Registry” and the “Klingon Master Starship Book”, as well as their OOB and production schedule in “Fighter Operations”, the Klingons started the Four Powers War with three C6s and built five more, and two of those were lost in the war. We know that the Y168 C8’s “Admiral Kang” and “Terror” had to have been upgraded from C6’s because the Klingon DN slots for Y167S and Y168S had to be used for their two C5’s. This leaves 4xC6 unaccounted for, specifically Atrocity, Victory, Carnivorous and Admiral Kruge, all of which are also named elsewhere as C9 dreadnoughts. And since the C8 and C9 are indistinguishable at the F&E level, this means that the Klingons should have four more C8s in their starting OOB (one each in the Northern Fleet, Eastern Fleet, Western Fleet, and Southern Reserve Fleet).

I realize that they were probably left out for balance reasons, but just how much would it really unbalance the game to give the Klingon Y168 OOB a historically accurate number of C8's?

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Friday, July 29, 2022 - 10:00 pm: Edit

One goes to the Romulans.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, July 29, 2022 - 10:45 pm: Edit

So far as I know, the Klingons have the historical number of DNs. You missed something in your count.

By Douglas Saldana (Dsal) on Monday, August 01, 2022 - 02:04 am: Edit

SVC's post in the closed topic indicates that there should be 6 DN in the Y168 OOB but I only see 2 in the linked OOB above (2 C8, no C9). Is there an error in the linked OOB?

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, August 01, 2022 - 02:39 am: Edit

In F&E, C8 and C9 are identical. Nothing is missing. The construction schedule accounts for the other four (as it does for other empires). Jeez, drop this. Now, please. My next post on this subject will announce that CL55 will be delayed to 2023 because of my time you wasted.

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Sunday, July 30, 2023 - 08:22 pm: Edit

Recommend changing Eastern Fleet deployment area to read:

Set up within two hexes of the Federation Neutral Zone, but not in 1707, 1708, 2517, or 2518.

The last two locations are in the TBS deployment area.

FEAST

By John de Michele (Johndemichele) on Monday, August 28, 2023 - 12:47 pm: Edit

Restrictions and Allowances - PF Tenders (432.42):

PFT limit...beginning Y180S

Klingon PFTs become available Y179S, so change to

PFT limit...beginning Y179S

John de Michele, 8/28/2023