Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board

Archive through September 16, 2023

Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board: Federation & Empire: F&E Master SITs: 02-Federation SIT Folder: Archive through September 16, 2023

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, May 13, 2021 - 10:40 am: Edit

Quote:
By Ahmad Abdel-Hameed (Madarab) on Thursday, May 13, 2021 - 09:22 am: Edit

Hey, I was reading SFB J2. In the text section about the CVH (and I presume this would also apply to the CAV?), it said that the ships often operated independantly after Y180.

Should we add to the text on the Master SIT about the CVH (and CAV?) that they can be operated without escorts after S180?

Federation: Heavy Cruisers: CAV: Notes: add: Single Ship Carrier in Y180+ Reasons listed below.

R2.100 CVH does indeed state that the ship operated without escorts beginning in Y180.
F&E Rule (440.1) Covering the NVH and NVA, F-111 and A-20 variants respectively, and the SIT state these ships are single ship carriers and do not require escorts.
R2.132 CAV does state that the ship can operate without escorts beginning in Y180 in the table showing the most likely escorts.

Thomas Mathews 13 May 2021

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, May 13, 2021 - 10:44 am: Edit

Federation: Heavy Cruisers: CVH: NOTES: add Single Ship Carrier Y180+ Reasons listed below.

R2.100 CVH does indeed state that the ship operated without escorts beginning in Y180.
F&E Rule (440.1) Covering the NVH and NVA, F-111 and A-20 variants respectively, and the SIT state these ships are single ship carriers and do not require escorts.
R2.132 CAV does state that the ship can operate without escorts beginning in Y180 in the table showing the most likely escorts.

Thomas Mathews 13 May 2021

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Friday, May 14, 2021 - 01:09 pm: Edit

Federation: New Heavy Cruisers: NHA: Reference (527.0) should be (532.0). The NHA carries A-20s (532.0) not F-111s (527.0) Thomas Mathews 14 May 2021

Federation: New Heavy Cruisers: NHA: Notes: add Single Ship Carrier Y180+ The table in R2.134 shows the NHA may operate without escorts beginning in Y180. Thomas Mathews 14 May 2021

Federation: New Heavy Cruisers: NHV: Notes: add Single Ship Carrier Y180+ The table in R2.113 shows the NHV may operate without escorts beginning in Y180. Thomas Mathews 14 May 2021

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 - 07:52 am: Edit

Wrong Topic

By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar3) on Saturday, May 22, 2021 - 06:26 pm: Edit

All A20 carriers must be escorted (532.225) ...

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, June 08, 2021 - 01:23 pm: Edit

SIT Federation DDX and HWX are size-4 units, but when used in battlegroups count against the limit on size-3 units (i.e., such a battlegroup can only have a total of three). This eliminates a problem caused by the 6xDDX superpack destroying everything in its sight during Y184. The change in size class is justified in both cases. The DDX is in fact a cruiser, not a destroyer, but is classified as size-4 due to its unique design history. We may yet change the Master SIT. As for the X-version of the HDW, what can we say? HDWs are just "strange" in many ways. They are as big as light cruisers, but classified as size-4 due to their DW design heritage. Allowing it to act as a size-4 unit in a battlegroup seriously warps the game system.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, June 08, 2021 - 04:02 pm: Edit

SIT-FED: The Federation DVL is converted from a DNL. Historically, this was done in Y173. The eight fighter factors are a single F14 squadron. No more than one can be in service at any given time. This ship can function as an unescorted carrier only when used on raids under the AO rules.
SIT-FED: The note on the Federation CVF means just what it says; you get to build this one ship outside of the normal production system. Only one can be in service at a time; building a replacement for the original CVF would mean converting a CF (2 points) or a CA (5 points) or building it as a substitution for a CF (10 points), plus the cost of fighters. This ship can function as an unescorted carrier only when used on raids under the AO rules.
SIT Federation SIT: CC should not have the battlegroup mark.

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Saturday, June 12, 2021 - 08:35 pm: Edit

ADD PDU+ for Fed PDU with doubled fighters

PDU+ R1.14 #(12)/None F&E 0 Y181 -NA- Built at Shipyard: 4+6 Self-generated: 5+6 Upgrade: 7+6 NOTE: Use the PDU+ for Federation Fighters with doubled fighters. Fed PDUs cannot use F-111s per (527.14). Ryan Opel CL53 Q&A 12 Jun 21

By Intuics on Tuesday, November 22, 2022 - 09:53 pm: Edit

Authentication Error

Your username/password combination was invalid, or you do not have permission to post to this topic. You may revise your username and password using the form at the bottom of this page.

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Monday, December 26, 2022 - 12:36 am: Edit

ALL LINE ITEMS HAVE BEEN NOTED ABOVE FOR SUBMISSION TO SVC BY THE END OF THE YEAR.

Ryan J Opel
FEAST

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, June 08, 2023 - 09:34 pm: Edit

FED SURVEY SHIPS - SIT CORRECTIONS

Fed GSC: Recommended CHANGES: From CA: 7; Rationale: [Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4] = 7
===
Fed CVL: Recommended CHANGES: From CA: 8+6; Rationale: [Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4]+[Carrier+1] = 8+6
Fed CVL: Recommended CHANGES: For CA: 16+6; Rationale: [CA+8]+[Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4]+[Carrier+1] = 16+6
===
Fed COV: Recommended CHANGES: From CA: 8; Rationale: [Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4]+[Troops+1] = 8
Fed COV: Recommended CHANGES: For CA: 16; Rationale: [CA+8]+[Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4]+[Troops+1] = 16
===
Fed GSX: Recommended CHANGES: From CC:12; Rationale: [CC base hull to x-ship+5]+[survey systems+3]+[EW+4]= 12
===
Fed GVX: Recommended CHANGES: From CX: 10+18; Rationale: [survey systems+3]+[EW+4]+[non-carrier: retrofit to add external F-111 links+3] = 10+18
Fed GVX: Recommended CHANGES: From GSC/COV: 9+18; Rationale: [CA base hull to x-ship+6]+[non-carrier: retrofit to add external F-111 links+3] = 9+18
Fed GVX: Recommended CHANGES: From CC: 15+18; Rationale: [CC base hull to x-ship+5]+[survey systems+3]+[EW+4]+[non-carrier: retrofit to add external F-111 links+3] = 15+18
Fed GVX: Recommended CHANGES: From GSX: 3+18; Rationale: [non-carrier: retrofit to add external F-111 links+3] = 10+18
Fed GVX: Recommended CHANGES: For CA: 21+18; Rationale: [CX+12]+[Survey Systems+3]+[EW+4]+[new build F-111 carrier+2] = 21+18

By Warren Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, June 12, 2023 - 09:06 pm: Edit

Fed NAE: From NEC: 4 should be 4Ñ (minor conversion symbol) Reason: The NCL conversion to an NCA is a 3 Point Minor conversion. The NEC to an NAC conversion is a 1 Point Minor conversion. While both conversions should be a 4 point minor similar to the NCL to NAE conversion. Thomas Mathews 12 Jun 2023

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Sunday, August 06, 2023 - 11:18 pm: Edit

FHL, 2xFTL, 3xFTS are listed in the SIT as FHL LAM, FTL LAG, and FTS SAG. The LAx/SAx is not supported by R8 as an alternate designator. Recommend removing the LAx/SAx from the SIT and leaving the first part of the name.

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Sunday, August 06, 2023 - 11:20 pm: Edit

FED REP-POD should be renamed REP to match counter.

By Ryan Opel (Feast) on Tuesday, September 05, 2023 - 10:50 pm: Edit

STP R1.145 0F/0 NO 0 Y178 None None (555.1): 440 0.000 The Racer's Edge, changes any ship to "fast"

Good one SVC took 3 yrs for someone to notice.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, September 07, 2023 - 03:13 pm: Edit

Ryan, prepare a list of needed changes for the Feds, all of them you have time to do, and post it. I'll let you know where we go from there.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, September 07, 2023 - 08:23 pm: Edit

NOW HEAR THIS - ALL HANDS ON DECK:

If ADB is readying to update the Feds SITs soon, one should post any Federation counter related SITS issues ASAP. However, before you do, PLEASE check this file for posts related to your issue so as to avoid repetitive posts.

Thank you,
FEDS

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, September 07, 2023 - 10:06 pm: Edit

Chuck, you are frightening the horses.

By Warren Mathews (Turtle) on Friday, September 08, 2023 - 08:36 am: Edit

Disregard:

Quote:
By Warren Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, June 12, 2023 - 09:06 pm: Edit

Fed NAE: From NEC: 4 should be 4Ñ (minor conversion symbol) Reason: The NCL conversion to an NCA is a 3 Point Minor conversion. The NEC to an NAC conversion is a 1 Point Minor conversion. While both conversions should be a 4 point minor similar to the NCL to NAE conversion. Thomas Mathews 12 Jun 2023

Replaced by:

Fed NAE: From NEC: 4 should be 3‡ Reason: The NCL conversion to an NCA is a 3 Point Minor conversion. The NEC to an NAC conversion is a 1 Point Minor conversion. This conversion qualifies as a two step conversion under (437.0). Thomas Mathews 8 Sep 2023}

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Saturday, September 09, 2023 - 05:19 am: Edit

Recommend adding the following Fed DLMs to the SIT:

Ship Ref Factors CR YIS Convert Build Salv Notes
DLM A10 10-11F(1)/5-6(0.5)+Module 9 Y180 From DNL: 2^+1 For DN: 18^+1 4.200 Fast Dreadnought, must use HDW modules, (551.63); conjectural. (^ plus configuration cost)
DLMA A10 10-11F(10V)/5-6(5V) 9 Y180 From DNL: 3+1+AOG For DN: 19+1+AOG 4.200 Heavy fighter (A-20) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMG A10 10-11FG(1)/5-6G(0.5) 9 Y180 From DNL: 3+1 For DN: 19+1 4.200 Commando mode; conjectural.
DLMK A10 11F(1)/6(0.5) 9 Y180 From DNL: 2+1 For DN: 18+1 4.200 Combat mode; conjectural.
DLMP A10 10-11FP*(1)/5-6P(0.5) 9 Y181F From DNL: 3+1+POG For DN: 19+1+POG 4.200 PF Tender mode; Scout (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.
DLMS A10 10-11F*(1)/5-6(0.5) 9 Y180 From DNL: 4$+1 For DN: 20+1 4.200 Scout mode; (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.
DLMV A10 10-11F(6)/5-6(3) 9 Y180 From DNL: 3+1+COG For DN: 19+1+COG 4.200 Medium carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMY A10 10-11F(8Y)/5-6(4Y) 9 Y180 From DNL: 3+1+YOG For DN: 19+1+YOG 4.200 Heavy fighter (F-101) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMZ A10 10-11F*(6H)/5-6(3H) 9 Y180 From DNL: 3+1+ZOG For DN: 19+1+ZOG 4.200 Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier. Scout (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.

* = Scout
$ = down arrow for minor conversion cost exception

Reference:

Quote:
(551.63) FEDERATION MODULAR DREADNOUGHT (DLM):
This ship was proposed but never built. The Federation can build
it in place of a dreadnought or convert it from a DNL. It uses the
HDW rules (525.2) but is limited to missions A (A-20s); G; K; S;
V; Y (F101s); Z. Mission P could be used if the Federation took
the option to build PFs but then Missions Y and A would be disallowed.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Saturday, September 09, 2023 - 05:54 am: Edit

Fed HWXs: the entire chart was a bad clone of the ISC chart with too many changes to report. Recommend using the following data:

Unit Ref Factors CR Year COVERSIONS BUILD Salvage SIT Notes
HWX 213 8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)+Module 7 Y182 From DW/HDW: NA; From: DWX: 2^+1 For DW: 10^+1 2.500 Heavy War Destroyer, must use HDW modules, (525.2)(§ in some modes); X-Ship. (^ plus configuration cost)
HWXA 213 8-10(10V)/4-5(5V) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+AOG; From DWX: 3+1+AOG For DW: 11+1+AOG 2.500 Heavy fighter (A-20) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXC 213 8-10(1)/4-5(0.5) 10 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1 For DW: 11+1 2.500 Command mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXE 213 8-10#(1)/4-5#(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1 For DW: 11+1 2.500 Heavy escort mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXF 213 8-10R(1)/4-5(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1 For DW: 11+1 2.500 Field repair mode; 4 repair points; X-Ship.
HWXG 213 8-10G(1)/4-5G(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1 For DW: 11+1 2.500 Commando mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXK 213 9-10(1)/5(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 2+1 For DW: 10+1 2.500 Combat mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXP 213 8-10P*(1)/4-5P*(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+POG; From DWX: 3+1+POG For DW: 11+1+POG 2.500 PF Tender mode; Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship; conjectural.
HWXQ 213 8-10*(1)/4-5*(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 5; From HWXS: 3; From DWX: 7+1; From DWSX: 5$+1 For DW: 15+1 2.500 Survey mode; Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship.
HWXR 213 8-10(1)[6]/4-5(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+FOP; From DWX: 3+1+FOP For DW: 11+1+FOP 2.500 FCR mode; size-3§; not an escort; X-Ship.
HWXS 213 8-10*(1)/4-5*(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 2; From DWX: 4$+1; From DWSX: 2+1 For DW: 12+1 2.500 Scout mode; size-3§; (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship.
HWXT 213 8-10(1)/4-5(0.5) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1 For DW: 11+1 2.500 Transport mode; carries 5EPs; cannot carry pods; X-Ship.
HWXV 213 8-10(6)/4-5(3) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+COG; From DWX: 3+1+COG For DW: 11+1+COG 2.500 Medium carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXY 213 8-10(8Y)/4-5(4Y) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+YOG; From DWX: 3+1+YOG For DW: 11+1+YOG 2.500 Heavy fighter (F-101) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXZ 213 8-10*(6H)/4-5*(3H) 7 Y182 From HWX: 1+ZOG; From DWX: 3+1+ZOG For DW: 11+1+ZOG 2.500 Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier; X-Ship.: Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1.

# = Escort box
* = Scout
$ = down arrow for minor conversion cost exception

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Saturday, September 09, 2023 - 09:41 pm: Edit

Fed HDW Report
Again, many errors to report.

FED Unit Ref Factors CR Year COVERSIONS BUILD Salvage SIT Notes
HDW 85 6-7(1)/3-4(0.5)+Module 6 Y180 From DW: 2^+1 For DW: 5^+1 1.500 Heavy War Destroyer, must use HDW modules, (525.2)(§ in some modes) (^ plus configuration cost)
HDWA 85 ok 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1+AOG For DW: 6+1+AOG 1.500 Heavy fighter (A-20) carrier mode; single-ship carrier.
HDWC 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 10 Y180 From DW: 3+1 For DW: 6+1 1.500 Command mode; size-3§
HDWE 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1; DWE: 2+1 For DW: 6+1 1.500 Heavy escort mode; size-3§
HDWF 85 6-7R(1)/3-4(0.5) 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1 For DW: 6+1 1.500 Field repair mode; 4 repair points.
HDWG 85 Add crippled G/ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1: DWG: 2+1 For DW: 6+1 1.500 Commando mode; size-3§
HDWK 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 2+1 For DW: 5+1 1.500 Combat mode; size-3§
HDWP 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y181F From DW: 3+1+POG For DW: 6+1+POG 1.500 PF Tender mode; Scout (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF); conjectural.
HDWQ 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 7+1; DWS: 5+1; From HDWS: 3 For DW: 10+1 1.500 Survey mode; Scout (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF)
HDWR 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1+FOP For DW: 6+1+FOP 1.500 FCR mode; size-3§; not an escort.
HDWS 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 4$+1; DWS: 2+1 For DW: 7+1 1.500 Scout mode; size-3§; (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF)
HDWT 85 Add crippled ftr triangle 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1: DWT: 2+1 For DW: 6+1 1.500 Transport mode; carries 5EPs; cannot carry pods.
HDWV 85 ok 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1+COG For DW: 6+1+COG 1.500 Medium carrier mode; single-ship carrier.
HDWY 85 6-7(8Y)/3-4(4Y) 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1+YOG For DW: 6+1+YOG 1.500 Heavy fighter (F-101) carrier mode; single-ship carrier.
HDWZ 85 6-7*(6H)/3-4(3H) 6 Y180 From DW: 3+1+ZOG For DW: 6+1+ZOG 1.500 Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier. Scout (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF)
.
HDW AOG +(10V) Y180 (525.23A): 0+18 Heavy Fighter Operations Group - A-20
HDW COG +(5) Y180 (525.23V): 0+10 Carrier Operations Group - F-18
HDW FOP +[6] Y180 (525.23R): 0+6 FCR Operations Package
HDW YOG +(8Y) Y180 (525.23Y): 0+14 Heavy Fighter Operations Group - F-101
HDW ZOG +(6H)* Y180 (525.23Z): 2+11 Special Fighter Operations Group - F-111
HDW POG +P* Y181F (525.23P): 5+¶ PF Operations Group; conjectural.
HDW HOG DELETE

# = Escort box
* = Scout
$ = down arrow for minor conversion cost exception

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, September 12, 2023 - 03:45 pm: Edit

Should not the HWXQ have the survey diamond and not the scout diamond?

FEDS: It is assumed that ALL Q variants of HDWs and HWXs have the colored survey scout diamond on the SITs and on the counters.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, September 12, 2023 - 04:01 pm: Edit

The comments in HWXZ,

"Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier; X-Ship.: Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1."

should be be

"Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier; X-Ship. Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1."

FEDS: Huh?

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, September 16, 2023 - 12:47 pm: Edit

Remove the colon in " X-Ship.:"

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation

Ship	Ref	Factors	CR	YIS	Convert	Build	Salv	Notes
DLM	A10	10-11F(1)/5-6(0.5)+Module	9	Y180	From DNL: 2^+1	For DN: 18^+1	4.200	Fast Dreadnought, must use HDW modules, (551.63); conjectural. (^ plus configuration cost)
DLMA	A10	10-11F(10V)/5-6(5V)	9	Y180	From DNL: 3+1+AOG	For DN: 19+1+AOG	4.200	Heavy fighter (A-20) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMG	A10	10-11FG(1)/5-6G(0.5)	9	Y180	From DNL: 3+1	For DN: 19+1	4.200	Commando mode; conjectural.
DLMK	A10	11F(1)/6(0.5)	9	Y180	From DNL: 2+1	For DN: 18+1	4.200	Combat mode; conjectural.
DLMP	A10	10-11FP*(1)/5-6P(0.5)	9	Y181F	From DNL: 3+1+POG	For DN: 19+1+POG	4.200	PF Tender mode; Scout (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.
DLMS	A10	10-11F*(1)/5-6(0.5)	9	Y180	From DNL: 4$+1	For DN: 20+1	4.200	Scout mode; (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.
DLMV	A10	10-11F(6)/5-6(3)	9	Y180	From DNL: 3+1+COG	For DN: 19+1+COG	4.200	Medium carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMY	A10	10-11F(8Y)/5-6(4Y)	9	Y180	From DNL: 3+1+YOG	For DN: 19+1+YOG	4.200	Heavy fighter (F-101) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; conjectural.
DLMZ	A10	10-11F*(6H)/5-6(3H)	9	Y180	From DNL: 3+1+ZOG	For DN: 19+1+ZOG	4.200	Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier. Scout (2EW:8AF)(1EW:10AF); conjectural.

Unit	Ref	Factors	CR	Year	COVERSIONS	BUILD	Salvage	SIT Notes
HWX	213	8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)+Module	7	Y182	From DW/HDW: NA; From: DWX: 2^+1	For DW: 10^+1	2.500	Heavy War Destroyer, must use HDW modules, (525.2)(§ in some modes); X-Ship. (^ plus configuration cost)
HWXA	213	8-10(10V)/4-5(5V)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+AOG; From DWX: 3+1+AOG	For DW: 11+1+AOG	2.500	Heavy fighter (A-20) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXC	213	8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)	10	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1	For DW: 11+1	2.500	Command mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXE	213	8-10#(1)/4-5#(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1	For DW: 11+1	2.500	Heavy escort mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXF	213	8-10R(1)/4-5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1	For DW: 11+1	2.500	Field repair mode; 4 repair points; X-Ship.
HWXG	213	8-10G(1)/4-5G(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1	For DW: 11+1	2.500	Commando mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXK	213	9-10(1)/5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 2+1	For DW: 10+1	2.500	Combat mode; size-3§; X-Ship.
HWXP	213	8-10P(1)/4-5P(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+POG; From DWX: 3+1+POG	For DW: 11+1+POG	2.500	PF Tender mode; Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship; conjectural.
HWXQ	213	8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 5; From HWXS: 3; From DWX: 7+1; From DWSX: 5$+1	For DW: 15+1	2.500	Survey mode; Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship.
HWXR	213	8-10(1)[6]/4-5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+FOP; From DWX: 3+1+FOP	For DW: 11+1+FOP	2.500	FCR mode; size-3§; not an escort; X-Ship.
HWXS	213	8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 2; From DWX: 4$+1; From DWSX: 2+1	For DW: 12+1	2.500	Scout mode; size-3§; (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1; X-Ship.
HWXT	213	8-10(1)/4-5(0.5)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1; From DWX: 3+1	For DW: 11+1	2.500	Transport mode; carries 5EPs; cannot carry pods; X-Ship.
HWXV	213	8-10(6)/4-5(3)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+COG; From DWX: 3+1+COG	For DW: 11+1+COG	2.500	Medium carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXY	213	8-10(8Y)/4-5(4Y)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+YOG; From DWX: 3+1+YOG	For DW: 11+1+YOG	2.500	Heavy fighter (F-101) carrier mode; single-ship carrier; X-Ship.
HWXZ	213	8-10(6H)/4-5(3H)	7	Y182	From HWX: 1+ZOG; From DWX: 3+1+ZOG	For DW: 11+1+ZOG	2.500	Special fighter (F-111) carrier mode; single ship carrier; X-Ship.: Scout (2EW:6AF)(1EW:8AF); Crippled EW=1.