Fed Police ship

Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board: Prime Directive RPG: DECK PLANS PROJECTS: Fed Police ship
  Subtopic Posts   Updated
Archive through April 08, 2013  25   04/08 06:59pm
Archive through April 20, 2013  25   04/20 10:04pm
Archive through May 13, 2013  25   05/13 11:00pm
Archive through June 02, 2013  25   06/02 10:31pm
Archive through June 09, 2013  25   06/09 11:41pm
Archive through February 24, 2014  25   02/24 11:11am
Archive through April 01, 2017  25   04/01 09:58pm
Archive through June 02, 2017  25   06/02 09:14pm
Archive through February 09, 2018  25   02/09 02:29pm
Archive through February 03, 2019  25   02/03 09:11pm
Archive through February 08, 2019  25   02/08 09:59pm
Archive through February 20, 2019  25   02/21 04:33pm
Archive through July 20, 2019  25   07/21 08:50am
Archive through July 30, 2019  25   08/28 05:58pm
Archive through October 23, 2019  25   12/01 04:09am
Archive through December 03, 2019  25   12/03 07:18pm
Archive through December 05, 2019  25   12/11 09:43pm
Archive through April 02, 2020  25   04/02 04:23pm
Archive through April 06, 2020  25   04/06 11:16pm
Archive through April 10, 2020  25   10/06 03:03pm
Archive through June 22, 2021  25   06/23 07:20pm
Archive through February 16, 2022  25   09/11 12:49pm
Archive through July 18, 2025  25   07/22 05:26pm

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Monday, July 21, 2025 - 12:10 am: Edit

Thanks, Jeff.

I don't know ... perhaps, given their mission statement, they need as much redundancy and alternate processes as possible.

Minor typo above: it's not eight pairs of spiral staircases, it's eight stairwells in four pairs. The reason they're in pairs is because there is a center horizontal turbolift corridor on several decks blocking foot travel from left to right sides of the ship.


Garth L. Getgen

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Monday, July 21, 2025 - 09:25 am: Edit

Small ship.

Not a lot of options, once it has been decided to include a turbolift system.

It appears to be an acceptable adaptation, if not Ideal.

Perhaps the next generation Federation Cutter design can offer an improvement, but off hand, I have no idea how that could be accomplished.

We have talked about the Federation FFG being a possible alternative, but again, it is another small ship, the main advantage being a saucer design as opposed to a rather longer, narrower one of comparable volume.

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Monday, July 21, 2025 - 12:42 pm: Edit

I made a /newurl{https://i.imgur.com/qMvKi7K.gif,saucer SSD} with all the same boxes from the POL / POL+, including same firing arcs. I suppose, in theory, a miniature and/or deck plans could be made for such a critter.

RE: Turbolifts -- very early on in the project, I asked SVC if I could do without, and he said he wanted them in due mainly for Module M rules.

I would have been happy to just use vertical-only elevators. Of course, thanks to Jeff W. and SPP, it does now have Cargo Lifts from Deck Eight up to Deck One.


Garth L. Getgen

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - 08:21 am: Edit

I still have the occasional nightmare of having to move drone reloads from low storage up to the shuttle bay for use in a scatter pack. Using stairs with a landing halfway up each deck level… reminds me of my college days helping friends move couches, refrigerators and larger sized bed box springs.

The worst one was an apartment stairwell far too small for the queen sized bed box spring.

We finally had to take the windows out of the frames and lift it up to the second floor thru the open window.

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - 05:26 pm: Edit

Jeff, they would have fit perfectly fine in the Turbolift. I hate to admit it, but adding the extra length allowed me to fix a (very minor) issue with mismatched room sizes, plus gave the crew eight storage rooms for personal property.


Garth L. Getgen

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - 06:27 pm: Edit

Garth, you might consider writing an article to submit detailing the experience you gained in doing the deck plans.

Might not add anything to the canon or history, but might encourage other people to try doing deck plans.

Just a thought.

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - 08:59 pm: Edit

Jeff,

Already done.


Garth L. Getgen

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Wednesday, July 23, 2025 - 06:32 am: Edit

I should have known!

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 05:56 pm: Edit

I had a LOT of free time on my hands for the past six weeks (Thank you, Congress), so I was looking my deck plans over. I crunched some numbers and figured the spiral staircases I had were going to be a lot steeper than I originally figured. Almost a 2:1 rise over run. I played around with it and think I have something that works better:

Old on left vs New on right. Arrow points UP.

And it fits the same footprint, but should be a 1:1 rise/run now.


Garth L. Getgen

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 06:37 pm: Edit

Nice. Did you see my post about the free deck plan book. Maybe you can't use it, but it might give you some ideas.

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 07:26 pm: Edit

Garth, looks good.

Silly question…

Is there any provision for isolating port side from starboard side in the event of hull breach?

If yes, Then it supports the case for maintaining port side verses starboard side damage control lockers.

If the answer is ‘No.” then maintaining two separate(but equal?) lockers is both repetitive and duplicative…

I realize you are working towards a symmetrical deck plan…and intellectually, I have no objection.

The cost accountant part of my brain is screaming about potential inefficiency and wasted capacity.

Lot of factors, is the amount of materials and items being stored in the lockers necessary to support the whole ship, or, could just one locker be enough?

Your call, I doubt anyone would ever question whatever you decide… but two identical lockers in a location that a hull breach would isolate them both until or unless crewmen in spaces suits arrived. (And no airlock means neither space can be accessed until air pressure is restored, and the equipment and tools needed to complete that task are in the two damage control lockers…)

One the whole, I just have to compliment you, nice job!

By Gregory S Flusche (Vandar) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 08:32 pm: Edit

I am hope that the stairs can be pulled out are folded somehow. That would facilitate cargo movement. The Navy ships I work on can remove the stairs/ladders. For that purpose.

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 08:54 pm: Edit

On those ships with an armored deck, not only can the starirs be removed, but if memory serves, there is a humongous heavy armored hatch that can be lowered over the opening and secured (water /fire/ air tight)

On a space ship, one would assume a hatch or panel can close the opening in event of a hull breach/depressurization of a section.

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Thursday, November 13, 2025 - 11:17 pm: Edit

Shawn, yes I did. It's what inspired me to take a look at my deck plans. Thank you.

Jeff, the center-line Turbolift tends to cut the ship in half port/starboard, so it would be easy to seal them off. There are two Damage Control Lockers because (1) to preserve the ship's symmetrical layout, (2) for redundancy, (3) so there is access to one from either side of the ship due to the center-line Turbolist, and (4) because this ship SSD shows it has a DamCon Rating of 2.

Gregory, there are dedicated Cargo Lifts in the aft hull to move items from the shuttle bay (Deck 1) to the cargo hold (Deck 8). But, yeah, sure, I suppose the stairs could open up somehow. In anything, I want to be able to seal them off to contain a hull breach to a single deck.

By the way, the circles in the Turbolift cars is to represent the space of five people. More than five can fit, but it gets a little cozy. I was able to 11 person icons (yes, I made icons for people) inside a lift, but it looked like a clown car.


Garth L. Getgen


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password:

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation