Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ISC plasma F fireing rate
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pneumonic81
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 275
Location: Austin TX

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:24 pm    Post subject: ISC plasma F fireing rate Reply with quote

I dont have this rule anyplace dispite having the ISC ships from the comms, can anyone tell me the fireing rate for the rear firing plasma clusters?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
junior
Captain


Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 803

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iirc, it depends on what you're firing at.

Against ships, it's one plasma per cluster of launchers per turn.

Against small targets (shuttles and drones) it's as many as you want.

Though I should double check that. It's been a while.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pneumonic81
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 275
Location: Austin TX

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems like there must be some rule for that. In SFB I think its like you said, but in FC I have no idea
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
junior
Captain


Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 803

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's in Booster #0, which I don't have handy at the moment.

It might also be discussed in the Communique that provides the FAQ and errata to the Booster #0 ISC rules. I don't remember which one that is off the top of my head, however.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4070
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was Communique #15.

Note that, when used Offensively (against ships), the launch rate is one Pl-F per SHIP, not per cluster. The Booster Zero rule was in error.

There is no limit on firing them Defensively, whether in the Offensive Fire Phase or the Defensive Fire Phase. (Other than whatever limits are imposed by them being Pl-F torpedoes.)
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pneumonic81
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 275
Location: Austin TX

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanx for the clarification Mike and everyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was wondering if those "clusters" were just replacements for the PL-D that didn't exist at the time? In SFC 2 The ISC had PL-D.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4070
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
I was wondering if those "clusters" were just replacements for the PL-D that didn't exist at the time? In SFC 2 The ISC had PL-D.


When the ISC (and their rear-firing Pl-F) were created, the Pl-D did not exist in the game. It is a completely open question if the ISC would have used Pl-D racks instead had they been in the game when the ISC were invented. The do, certainly, serve a very similar function. If they were used instead, I doubt there would be quite as many present, however.

That said, the opportunity was there when the Captain's Edition was created to make such a change and it was not taken. So, the rear-firing Pl-F remain.

They are what they are. (I seem to be saying this frequently, lately. Smile )
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mjwest wrote:
pinecone wrote:
I was wondering if those "clusters" were just replacements for the PL-D that didn't exist at the time? In SFC 2 The ISC had PL-D.


When the ISC (and their rear-firing Pl-F) were created, the Pl-D did not exist in the game. It is a completely open question if the ISC would have used Pl-D racks instead had they been in the game when the ISC were invented. The do, certainly, serve a very similar function. If they were used instead, I doubt there would be quite as many present, however.

That said, the opportunity was there when the Captain's Edition was created to make such a change and it was not taken. So, the rear-firing Pl-F remain.

They are what they are. (I seem to be saying this frequently, lately. Smile )


What do you mean by there might not be as many present?

Oh, and you have been saying that alot Laughing .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4070
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
What do you mean by there might not be as many present?

Just that an ISC CA has six rear-firing torpedoes. This is because they load slowly (once per three turns). If they used Pl-D racks instead, they might only have two racks, and certainly wouldn't have had more than four.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But they are loaded from the start, so I doubt it would be too bad of a disadvantage (And if it were, the point value could be decreased.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pneumonic81
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 275
Location: Austin TX

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whats great about those rear firing plasma Fs is, its a great distraction when your trying to reload the ppd. What works for me is to come in on an oblique approach, fire the ppd at 15 the end of the turn and break off. if they pursue they gett o fly thru a plasma F as well. Some will do that, but most wont.

As ISC I often dance peoples shields right off with those PPDs, thing is we had a guy who thought he could fire tons of pl-F and so I needed to clarify that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with that is that the pl-F's are in the back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pneumonic81
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 275
Location: Austin TX

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
The problem with that is that the pl-F's are in the back.


Generally, when im running away, my opponent is behind me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, there's always reverse movement.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group