|
Federation Commander A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: Defeating the zero-energy anchor |
|
|
The zero-energy anchor is a published tactic where a plasma-armed ship can launch at range 1 with the supposed guarantee that the target will not have been able to move before the plasma torpedo does, thus guaranteeing a hit.
However, I beg to differ. Unless the torp is launched at range zero, a ship moving at speed 24+1 may possibly be able to run away from the torp - depending on the geometry of the approach.
Has anyone else noticed this?
If the torp is launched at range zero then yes, the torp will catch even a 24+1 target in the same sub-pulse that it moves out of the hex.
But if you can get to move at the same speed as the torp, then it will not catch you until you want it to. Ok, you may need a high-energy turn to get the angles right, but it doesn't look as foolproof as I once thought.
Or have I missed something? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bolo_MK_XL Captain
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 836 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Or have I missed something? |
Just off top of my head,
Unless the plasma was launched on impulse 8,
You then start a new turn (few weapons charged, no energy for anti-tractor etc),
Otherwise, I don't believe your very likely to have the energy to make it work ---
If you do, your gonna eat a tail full of phasers and bolted plasmas (if he has any not launched yet) --- Depending on his speed you may end up tractored (more than likely an attempt has already been made, further draining energy) ---
Plausible scenario, but lots of stars have to be aligned for it to come out in your favor --- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storeylf Fleet Captain
Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Posts: 1897
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't read the tactic (is it written somewhere) but is not the zero-energy part referring to the zero energy of the target, hence he can't do 24+1 as he can't afford the +1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, it means that it costs you no power, instead of having to tractor him and have to use power. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bolo_MK_XL Captain
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 836 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | No, it means that it costs you no power, instead of having to tractor him and have to use power. |
Which would put the target in a position without speed/power to escape, so no tractor is needed --- Otherwise a tractor would be needed ---
As Storey said, its been a bit since I read the tactic, but with most it assumes there is a mitigating issue that makes it possible --- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, does anyone please know where this original tactic was published? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I've found it. It was one of Pat Doyle's from Captain's Log #38. It's on page 31, in the second-to-last paragraph under 'Inflicting Damage'. Plus he doesn't call it the 'Zero-Energy Anchor'; I don't know where that name came from!
And I read it wrong. In his tactic, you launch at range zero; there is no escape then. I, however, used it in actual combat at range 1, but the target was doing Speed 16+1 so it had the same effect.
However the tactic and its counters are an interesting field of study; I have presented a refined version of the tactics below and I have also submitted it as a proper command note. Read on.
---
Thoughts on the 'Plasma Hack and Slash'
The 'Zero-Energy Anchor' is a tactic whereby plasma launched at one hex range, against a ship moving at 16 or 16+1, will automatically hit its target before it can move away, without the launching ship having to spend power on a tractor beam. Alternatively, even a target moving at speed 24 or 24+1 can not escape the plasma if you launch at Range 0. To take advantage of this, then, you need to end your movement so that a) your plasma has the target in arc, b) you are at one or zero hexes range, and c) preferably, you are facing the weakest shield you can get to.
As an attacker, therefore, you can use a 'plasma hack and slash' attack whereby you damage or drop the enemy's facing shield with direct fire weapons, then launch plasma at the end of that same impulse. The plasma will then impact the ship on that weakened shield because of the ‘zero-energy anchor’.
However, if you are the target ship for such an attack, you can still do something about that incoming fire: you can perform a high energy turn in order to turn a fresh shield to your attacker. It is important to make sure that you save the power for this; if you are about to receive direct fire from an enemy ship at one hex range that plasma he can launch this impulse, you should be careful to save some power for that high energy turn and not squander it all on reinforcement. Keeping only a single point of power in order to perform an Emergency Deceleration followed by a Tactical Maneuver is not an option in this case as the plasma will impact before you can execute the maneuver.
Also, and this is not often appreciated, if you can accelerate to speed 24+1, then you may be able to escape, depending on the geometry of the launching ship’s approach – unless he’s at Range 0 of course.
In this situation, a canny opponent can also threaten a tractor beam anchor if he has enough power; countering this beam could also eat into the power you are keeping for your high energy turn. In this case, the situation will have to dictate whether it is better to accept the tractor and still be able to perform the high energy turn, or avoid the tractor anchor. However, most of the time it would be better to keep the power for the high energy turn, because you will probably need it anyway if he anchors you. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjwest Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4075 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't forget one last point. If the target is moving speed 24 (and who isn't against a loaded plasma ship), using an acceleration can force the torpedo to hit a different shield. Granted, you have far fewer shields you can expose by accelerating instead of using an HET, but it costs one-fifth as much energy, too.
A correllary to this is NEVER slip into this hex. Do not slip into a hex if you are going to end up in the same hex as an armed plasma ship. That maximizes your options when you go speed 24+1 against range zero plasma. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Democratus Lieutenant JG
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 36 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a little rusty on the FedCom seeking weapon rules.
Does a seeking weapon have to move directly forward after firing? Does it stay in the same hex if it performs an HET?
If either of these is answered with 'yes' then you can even escape a plasma at range zero with speed 24+1 and an HET. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bolo_MK_XL Captain
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 836 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(4J3b) Function: Plasma torpedoes, once launched, function as seeking weapons ----
(4F3e) High Energy turns: Seeking weapons make a high energy turn (2D2) only if doing so would cause them to impact on their target in the current Movement Sub-Pulse --
(4G3) Movement: Last sentence Drones make HETs on one of the sub-pulses in which they are scheduled to move, and move one hex after turning to face the new direction
Found nothing in plasma rules to that say the same, but with FCs ease of play rules, believe plasma would operate in the same manner --- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
terryoc Captain
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1386
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unlike SFB, in Fed Com seeking weapons can (and indeed, must) move in the same movement pulse as a high energy turn, so if he launches at range 0, the torp will impact.
As noted though, a high energy turn could change which shield the torpedo impacts, and you don't even need to leave the hex for that. _________________ "Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Democratus wrote: | Does a seeking weapon have to move directly forward after firing? Does it stay in the same hex if it performs an HET?
If either of these is answered with 'yes' then you can even escape a plasma at range zero with speed 24+1 and an HET. |
This raises an interesting point. We know that a seeking weapon has to move one hex forwards immediately after launch.
However, can the weapon HET straight away - without having to move that one hex - if that would cause it to hit its target? We've always played it that it can, because we always saw the mandatory one hex of movement as that required to fulfil the weapon's turn and slip modes. The HET immediately after launch is therefore a logical ability if that is the reason why the weapon has to move one hex.
Have we been playing it right, then? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wolverin61 Commander
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 495 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have my rulebook in front of me, but iirc it says a drone has to HET if doing so will cause it to hit its target that move. So I'd say you're doing it right, Tony. _________________ "His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjwest Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4075 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, this was one of my first rulings when I got the "Answer Guy" job.
The third paragraph of rule (2C3b) specifically states that HETs are an exception to the requirement to move straight foward as the first move of a seeking weapon. (The current reading was a direct result of that ruling.)
And to the question before, unlike in SFB, a seeking weapon still moves in the same sub-pulse they perform the HET. The HET does NOT replace the movement. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Democratus Lieutenant JG
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 36 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for clarifying that! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|