Federation Commander

Bolo_MK_XL · Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject:

If you can use 2 BBs, why couldn't you use a single little CS ---

Nerroth · Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject:

As a point of comparison, the SFB CS has a BPV of 155, relative to the 145 of the CL.

Not sure about the DNT, though; but as a further point of comparison, the all-plasma DNP from Module R7 has a BPV of 260, compared to the all-PPD DN's 280. Maybe the DNT is somewhere in between (270, perhaps)?
_________________
FC Omega Discussion (v3)
FC LMC Discussion

mojo jojo · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 340

It seems that SFB values the difference at 5 pts per PPD. I'm concerned that this is too low for FC. The PPD is way better than in SFB, and the PL-S isn't as effective as SFB.

DirkSJ · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 239

DirkSJ · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 239

The question of PPDs expected number of pulses at each range bothered me so I wrote a spreadsheet to roll several hundred thousand dice and look at averages.

Tests using non-overloaded PPDs (4 pulses).
Data collected across 20,000 samples as "average number of pulses hitting".
Sample taken repeatedly to determine range of results.

Range 4-10:
SFB method: 94.9 - 95.1% of pulses hit
FC method: 92.8 - 93.2% of pulses hit
Difference: ~2% more miss

Range 11-15:
SFB method: 90.3 - 90.8% of pulses hit
FC method: 85.9 - 86.4% of pulses hit
Difference: ~4.5% more miss

Range 16-20:
SFB method: 82.4 - 83.0% of pulses hit
FC method: 75.9 - 76.7% of pulses hit
Difference: ~6.5% more miss

Range 21-25:
SFB method: 68.8 - 69.5% of pulses hit
FC method: 63.4 - 64.3% of pulses hit
Difference: ~5.3% more miss

The PPD lost accuracy and overload. That may be the source of some of the lack of point difference. This was just a fast brute force method. I suppose I could work out the actual mathematical probabilities. If I get bored I will.

DirkSJ · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 239

I'm a nerd with too much time on my hands. Actual math working out the true probabilities.

mojo jojo · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 340

The problem is that in FC, all 4 pulses will hit the same facing shield immediately. In SFB, the opponent can take countermeasures and can turn another shield towards the PPD or possibly even get out of firing arc before the last pulses hit. Losing overload is also meaningless since it's virtually impossible to hit more than 4 times between range 4-8 anyway, except vs something like a base.

terryoc · Captain Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1386

I think the points thing was a way of "splitting the difference" between two almost identical ships, so you could put them both on the same Ship Card.

Bolo_MK_XL · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:08 pm Post subject:

terry,

You missed what I was trying to get across ---

The rules allow 2 BBs on one side in a game (not necessarily ISC),
if that is possible, why not a lowly CS with multiple PPDs --

Steve Cole · Site Admin Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3832

A few random answers....

The points are what they are. There are no adjustments. We split the difference.

I'm not sure on the "always use a single ship" thing. I want to go look something up. Usuaully, the ISC used the torpedo ships for lone patroles and kept the PPD ships in echelons.

Two BBs, yes, for most people. I'd have to go do some digging about the ISC. I'm not sure if the PPD limit supercedes. They can use BBs as part of a fleet, but I don't think they use them alone.

That said, and pending further research, anything your opponent agrees to is ok, but he doesn't have to agree.
_________________
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander

mojo jojo · Lieutenant Commander Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 340

I don't agree with this ruling that the points are equal between the ships since the weapon capabilities are clearly not equal, but I will accept it and use it if I ever run an ISC fleet.

terryoc · Captain Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1386

Nerroth · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:12 pm Post subject:

Maybe there could be some sort of plasma variant BB (or BBL, perhaps) for the ISC to use in larger battles?

Also, in terms of lone patrols, the PPD-armed Star Cruiser was described as a ship often sent out in this manner; but it is still more of a mixed-weapon ship than the CS would be. (Plus there's no CAT in FC yet to use in place of the CA, if you didn't want the PPD used...)
_________________
FC Omega Discussion (v3)
FC LMC Discussion

terryoc · Captain Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1386

Gary, the CS violates the letter of the rule because it has 2 PPDs and if it's patrolling alone, that's more PPDs than ships. The Star Cruiser only has one PPD, so it's OK to be in duels or as an echelon core ship.

As for the BB-plasma, I'd always prefer the BB-PPD. The Gorns already have a hugemungous plasma boat if I want to play a big plasma BB. I don't see the BBP as adding much to hte game.
_________________
"Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West

Sir Drake · Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:43 am Post subject:

Ship/weapon limits thought this is FC, not SFB. Got to say I don't like seeing this stuff starting to show up FC. Sure you can say "you don't have to play that way" but see how well that worked for SFB. Hope it's not a trend.

P.S. I feel the same about WCs also, but that dosn't come up much Razz

_________________
Colour Sergeant Bourne: It's a miracle.
Lieutenant John Chard: If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.
Colour Sergeant Bourne: And a bayonet, sir, with some guts behind.
From the Movie ZULU