Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Plans for PDF ship packs on e23.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nerroth
Fleet Captain


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 1744
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So long as their presence here didn't pre-empt their eventual use for laminated cards in forthcoming modules, I'd be all for raiding the R-series books for viable ship classes.


In the case of Star Fleet, the DNF, CB, NLF, CM, FBD, PFF and FLG could be up for grabs; of those, the ones which constitute new ship classes would be fun not only for their own sake, but in terms of setting a precedent for what ship classes might be in later modules.


For the Klingons, there is an array of ISF ships which could be options; I can think of the D6I, D5I (or was it D7I?), G6, G4, G2, G2C, F5P, F5I, E4I, E4C, E3 and E3C, but don't recall how many more they might also have.

Plus, there are the SD7, D7W, FD5, HD5, D6L, E7D, F6B and D7WD; maybe the B8 as an oddball choice? Or whatever the Klingons called their conversions of those three impounded SparrowHawks, for that matter? Or one or more of the Diplomatic Cruisers (D7N, D6N and D5N)?


For the Romulans, the SUN, VUL, FSP, GHA, JH, FLG and HKR could be useful. Maybe a Kestrel-ification of the FD5, to add something new? Oh, and the regular KD5R, too. Ahem.
_________________
FC Omega Discussion (v3)
FC LMC Discussion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could someone tell me what the E7 actually was? I am more inclined to use (or battle) ships if I know more about them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4075
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
Could someone tell me what the E7 actually was? I am more inclined to use (or battle) ships if I know more about them.

The E7 was an E5 with some "wings" added on to make it into a cruiser. It is a "tinker-toy" type ship that was a failed design. Yet, it is kinda cool, too.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gar1138
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 346
Location: Eugene, OR

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mjwest wrote:
pinecone wrote:
Could someone tell me what the E7 actually was? I am more inclined to use (or battle) ships if I know more about them.

The E7 was an E5 with some "wings" added on to make it into a cruiser. It is a "tinker-toy" type ship that was a failed design. Yet, it is kinda cool, too.

The E7 was in Communique #19 and the E5 was in Communique #20.

Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Gar and Mike! however...

What was the E5? I know where the ship card is, but again I don't really know what the ship is for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4075
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The E5 was an attempt to make a usable frigate that was better than the E4 using existing "parts". It has the boom of an F5, the hull of an E4, and the single engine of a D5. It was, of course, considered a failure.

Interestingly, it is a great squadron/fleet ship, as it had Ph-1s and FX disruptors, and could turn and keep up with the big boys. But, it was a crappy patrol (aka "duel") ship as it had no redundancy. One punch and it is hollowed out.

The E5, and its big brother the E7, are "tinker toy" ships that were attempts to create combat effective star ships at bargain basement prices using existing parts and systems. Neither design worked out particularly well, though the E5 had some redeeming qualities. Both are "historical footnotes" with design problems, but were also interesting in their own way.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But yet... there were so many E5 and E7 variants. How is that possible if there were so few of them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OGOPTIMUS
Captain


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 980

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't seem to find any of the variants right now in main products, just the K variant to the E5.

The only place you might find the answer is in the Class History article in CL35, which also contains some variants (perhaps the ones that you are talking about).

Bear in mind that many variants are conjectural, and if the E5 or E7 had been approved in place of another ship in the regular production line, and really would only come into play if that were the case. In that case, the variants would have been designed and perhaps even built. This information is also provided for player campaigns.
_________________
O.G. OPTIMUS


Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember, SFB is full of variants, conjectural ships, never built ships, etc. The rules are different there. For one thing, there are no battleships, except the B-10. Federation Commander is its own beast.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
DirkSJ
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 239

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shinanygnz wrote:
Is Andromedan (or ISC) Attack on the cards (pun intended)? If not, an Andro pack would be nice for stuff like the Dominatrix ( what a name for a ship Wink ) and the other DOM/INT/COQ non-BoM variants plus the Viper.

Other than the DDL and scout/fighter/tug variants I can't find any other ISC ships in my SFB collection that are not already laminated in FC. It's also possible that I just don't have some pack or set that had them....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4075
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are the promised Klingon and Romulan lists. Note that these are just lists of available ships. Unlike the Federation, there is no struggle to get to 12 ships for either. Also, the only "new" class I am including is the CCH/CB class. I am ignoring any others. I am also ignoring HDWs, as Steve mentioned putting them in their own PDF packs.

Klingon: B9, B8, C9, D7W, D7D, SD7, D6J, FDW, RKL, D5L, D5J, F6, F6B, F5D, F5J, E7, E6, E5, E5D, E4D, E4J, E3, G2.

Wow. I am sure I missed a couple, which means there could be two Klingon packs if that's what Steve wanted to do ...

Romulan: DMH, MGH, OMH, KH, RGK, SPJ, SPL, SKE, JH, SEE, K10R, KCR, K7R, KE7, KWR*, KDR, KFR, K5D, KE5, K4R, K4D, VUL.

If Gorn/ISC Attack is to be done, then I would like to see the DMH, K7R, KDR, and VUL saved for that. Those four deserve laminated cards.

[*] I believe this is the K-D5W-R. In addition, there are also the other "W" ships, including the K-D7W-R and the K-F5W-R. So that is really two more ships than listed above.

[Edit: Forgot the Regalhawk! Now on the list.]
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy


Last edited by mjwest on Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:49 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
terryoc
Captain


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 1386

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike, I think you have missed the D7D (four-drone variant of the D7) which was featured in communique some time ago.

DMH = Demonhawk? If so, I agree that the Demonhawk and Vulture deserve their own laminated cards. And the Klingon-Romulan D7 and D5 too.

I think the K-F5W-R is in a recent Captain's Log, that would be worth including.
_________________
"Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4075
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crap. I had D7D on my list, but must have missed it when I was reordering them to try and put them in some kind of "size" order. I did mean to included it. (I have added it to the other message.)

Yes, DMH is the Demonhawk. The nice thing is that there are so many candidates that it is really easy to keep those four in reserve (DMH, VUL, K7R, KDR), yet still provide a very strong group of ships.

And I did note the K-F5W-R at the bottom of my post. (Along with the hypothetical K-D7W-R that I am not sure exists or not.)
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the idea of "variant packs" and would probably buy them. Here are some more Fed ships to use:

CAD
CHA
CLD
PDD


Also, the D7E would be a possibility for the klinks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4075
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
I like the idea of "variant packs" and would probably buy them. Here are some more Fed ships to use:
CAD
CHA
CLD
PDD
Also, the D7E would be a possibility for the klinks.

A couple of points:
- The D7E, CAD, CLD, and (unmentioned) GSC are all out because they have special sensors. Steve unequivocally said "no BoM". That means no special sensors. That means they are out. (This is specifically why there are no survey ships or large drone ships in any of the lists I made.)
- I tried to not list completely rejected designs that were never produced. At least small quantities of the E5 and E7 were made. The PDD (and COR and IPL) failed. Remember, none of those ships were worth including in a real SFB product; why would they be worth making in FC? The successful design, the PFF, is in the list.
- OK, I have no idea what the CHA is. Can't find it anywhere. If it is not a completely new class (e.g. CWF, CWH, CCH), does not contain BoM technology (e.g. sensors, fighters), and was actually built in at least token numbers, then I guess we can add it to the list.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 9 of 16

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group