| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gar1138
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 346
Location: Eugene, OR
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I also agree that it should be 1d6 for shuttle hits always (both offensive and defensive). I would be interested to learn the reasoning behind the decision to make them different.
Garrett |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 836
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My assumption about adds killing shuttles that have impacted is bookkeeping -- if you shoot and don't kill it -- you have to maintain a running total on damage -- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JonPerry
Lieutenant SG
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 124
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| true, but we were prepared to keep track of that damage before the latest version of the rules, when we'd just be shooting at shuttles with our phasers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mjwest
Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4070
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The reason is because Steve thought it worked better that way.
Not a huge long explanation, but there it is.
_________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
