|
Federation Commander A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:10 pm Post subject: Hit and Run attacks vs. PA Panels - clarification request |
|
|
Rule (3G7b) says that, "Hit-and-run attacks through a down bank can attack a bank (not a panel) ... [if any raids] ... disable the target, it is disabled."
My question is, what is 'the target'? Because the raid can only target 'a bank', is the target the 'bank'? In which case, if the raid is successful, is the entire 'bank' disabled, or only one panel in that bank?
I trust you can see the 'discrepancy', in that if you can't target an individual panel, but only a bank, then it's the bank that should be destroyed - but isn't that a little harsh (on the Andros, I mean!)? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjwest Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4072 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What it is trying to say is that a H&R raid will destroy a panel in a bank, but you can't choose which one. Meaning you reduce the capacity on the bank, but no energy is released if that capacity was not being used. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kang Fleet Captain
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah - got it! That makes a lot of sense - thanks Mike! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|