 |
Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pixelgeek
Lieutenant SG
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 137
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2021 4:27 pm Post subject: Running Adrift change |
 |
|
I assume that it is too late to rename Running Adrift to just Adrift?
The phrase 'Running Adrift' implies movement which is just not the case in the rules. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 9:20 pm Post subject: Re: Running Adrift change |
|
|
| pixelgeek wrote: | I assume that it is too late to rename Running Adrift to just Adrift?
The phrase 'Running Adrift' implies movement which is just not the case in the rules. |
Probably so, since it's already listed by that name in three books.
Besides, the implication of movement helps to remind one that this is still a valid unit and can (and MUST) be activated during the turn, even though there is no movement per se.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ericphillips
Commander
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 702
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Late with this, but remember 1" is like at least 10000 km. So it is drifting, but the resolution of the game is not enough to show the drift.
_________________
"I could have been an adventurer like you, but I took an arrow to the knee." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
