View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kang Fleet Captain

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 1976 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...oh and I loved the little featurette on Jean. Very nicely done Glad to see she's settling in ok. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Communique 98 was posted yesterday. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jean Site Admin

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1732
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hailing Frequencies and Communique for December have been posted.
Two new Christmas ships, a light cruiser and the commando variant of it. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Fleet Captain

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 1675 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just saw the January Communique and am looking forward to playing the scenario with the specialty drone ship.
Also noticed the pic of the Fed police cruiser, the Emitter Flash. It has a "54" on it. Hidden meaning for "Car 54"??? _________________ Mike
=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djdood Commodore

Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3410 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Neat to have the CAD Agincourt in FedCom. _________________
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scoutdad Commodore

Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep. Already added it to ACTASF Book 2, now to use the actual Fed Comm version to insure its correct. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Fleet Captain

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 1675 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 12:13 pm Post subject: Ghost Outrider |
|
|
Love the cowboy song, Ghost Riders in the Sky! [especially as sung by the Sons of the Pioneers in their Cool Water album]
Looking forward to trying the new scenario! _________________ Mike
=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Fleet Captain

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 1675 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:16 pm Post subject: Is the tiny planet in (8CM139) a large asteroid or a moon? |
|
|
Is the tiny planet in (8CM139) RAID ON A LONELY PLANET in Communique 152 a large asteroid or a moon?
The intro/background section says it is a "tiny" planet without an atmosphere, but nothing else is mentioned about its size, especially in the initial set-up section. Whether it is a large asteroid or a moon should be stated in the Initial Set-Up section (8CM139b).
The version 6 rules give two possibilities for a tiny planet: either a large asteroid or a moon. These have different effects on weapons and movement. See 6B 1st paragraph and 6B4 intro. _________________ Mike
=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mjwest Commodore

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4064 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2018 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since it is identified as a "planet", a planet it is. I suppose there could have been a clarification that it is the size of a moon and treated as such, that was not done.
So, it is just a (6A1) planet. The "tiny" descriptor is just for color. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Fleet Captain

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 1675 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2019 3:07 pm Post subject: Communique #168 scenario |
|
|
Scenario: 8CM154 - A Lonely Christmas
Re: Time Limit: Eight turns. At this point, if the issue remains in
doubt, other forces will arrive and that commander will claim the
victory.
Question: Which commander is this referring to? I'm thinking it's probably the Alliance commander, but it's not stated clearly. _________________ Mike
=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mjwest Commodore

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4064 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2019 2:34 am Post subject: Re: Communique #168 scenario |
|
|
Mike wrote: | Question: Which commander is this referring to? I'm thinking it's probably the Alliance commander, but it's not stated clearly. |
It is the commander of the arriving force. In other words, if an otherwise winning player exceeds the time limit, they lose irrespective of any other victory conditions because the commander of the arriving force takes all of the credit. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was clear "THAT commander" refers to the arriving force. No other reading of the sentence makes grammatical sense. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Fleet Captain

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 1675 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't want to nitpick, but if the Klingon player doesn't achieve any of the three levels of victory conditions by the end of turn 8, the scenario says the Alliance player wins by default.
The way I read your answer, the Klingon player has the arriving force after turn 8. _________________ Mike
=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would somebody tell me how to fix my sig graphic? _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|