View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Burning Chrome Lieutenant SG

Joined: 04 Feb 2011 Posts: 118 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve Cole wrote: | Doing a D4 would mean doing all of the historically corresponding ships at more or less the same time. I'd be concerned over sales potential. |
Hmm, that sounds interesting.
I've been very tempted to pick up all the early years stuff lately... _________________ Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself.-- Mark Twain |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sneaky Scot Commander

Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 475 Location: Tintern, Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2014 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't the D4 pretty much look like a D6? Admittedly there is one less phaser in the nose battery and only single disruptor mounts on the engine (just received my birthday present which happens to be a Klingon fleet box - hurrah) but I do't imagine it looks all that different.
A D7C might be nice - I liked the Fed CA/CC changes, and something similar might be nice. _________________ Nothing is quite as persuasive as a disruptor pistol on slow burn and a rotisserie...... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2014 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D4 is a little smaller and the front hull plate is flat. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pvt64 Ensign
Joined: 10 Dec 2014 Posts: 13 Location: Ballston Lake NY
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:50 pm Post subject: Ship Suggestions |
|
|
For Starline 2400: Klingon G2, Gorn Police Frigate, Federation A-10 & F-14 fighters. Gorn carriers if the model would be different from the original types converted from. Same for Tholian, I would think that they would differ as the fighter bays are supposed to be external. _________________ Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gorn carriers are no different.
Tholians don't sell well enough to make ships with external bays that you could easily just paint on. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2500 update: master mold two should reach Bruce by Saturday. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pvt64 Ensign
Joined: 10 Dec 2014 Posts: 13 Location: Ballston Lake NY
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:58 pm Post subject: New Ships |
|
|
Sorry to hear that the Tholians do not sell so well. After the Romulans, they are my favorites. _________________ Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mdauben Lieutenant JG

Joined: 15 Aug 2013 Posts: 92 Location: Rocket City
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: Ship Suggestions |
|
|
pvt64 wrote: | Federation A-10 & F-14 fighters. |
If you check out the SFU Miniatures Painting and Kitbashing Tips Facebook page, there's a couple people who have done step by step conversions of the Federation A-10 and F-14 fighters that look really excellent. If you have a bit of modeling skill it might be worth trying to convert your own.  _________________ Mike
"The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pvt64 Ensign
Joined: 10 Dec 2014 Posts: 13 Location: Ballston Lake NY
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:49 pm Post subject: Fighters |
|
|
mdauben, worth a shot. _________________ Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markgeorgetwo Lieutenant Commander

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 372 Location: london england
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:57 pm Post subject: post subject |
|
|
one miniature i would like to see is the federation car has i have found out doing the conversion is a bit of a pain in the butt.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scoutdad Commodore

Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 7:10 pm Post subject: Re: post subject |
|
|
markgeorgetwo wrote: | one miniature i would like to see is the federation car has i have found out doing the conversion is a bit of a pain in the butt.  |
Why?
The miniature for the CA is the CAR+. The +refit adds:
Shield boxes - not displayed on the mini
APR boxes - also not displayed on the mini
2 Phaser-3s - on the secondary hull.
To convert the existing CA mini to a CAR, all you have to do is file or sand off the two bumps for the phaser 3s. It's probably the easiest conversion out there.
And unless you're totally anal about your minis - you don't even have to remove the phaser mounts, just don't paint them as weapons and leave them the same base color as the CA mini is. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markgeorgetwo Lieutenant Commander

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 372 Location: london england
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:56 am Post subject: post subject |
|
|
yeah scout dad the pain i had was putting the pins in the nacelles i used the plastic ones in the end has i did not have a drill bit smaller to drill out the holes has i wanted the correct look like the ones in jaynze ships so far i have done four ships
One thing i want to know is how many cars where built and what era ships are they early/or middle years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pvt64 Ensign
Joined: 10 Dec 2014 Posts: 13 Location: Ballston Lake NY
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:43 pm Post subject: FRD |
|
|
Any thoughts on production of a FRD? _________________ Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jdemichele Lieutenant JG

Joined: 17 Feb 2016 Posts: 27 Location: Western Washington
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andros for 2500  _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Cole Site Admin

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3821
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There will never be Andros for 2500. The existing 2400 Andros will serve for both scales. We don't sell enough of them for two sets of molds and two sets of sculpting costs. The hard realities of business are what they are. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|