View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cnuzzi Lieutenant Commander
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/Yorktown.jpg)
Joined: 10 Jun 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:26 pm Post subject: Where is the pod on the Gorn Battle Tug? |
|
|
I just purchased the Battle Tug pack from W23, and I was wondering what section of the Gorn BT makes up the pod? Is it the rear saucer, or the center section perhaps? Are the wings part of the pod or the tug? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4074 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The pod is the rear saucer. Only the saucer is the pod. The rest is the ship. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
cnuzzi Lieutenant Commander
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/Yorktown.jpg)
Joined: 10 Jun 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:43 pm Post subject: Gorn BT |
|
|
Thank you. What was confusing me was how well-armed the Gorn BT is compared with the Fed BT, which has no "native" heavy weapons. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Sneaky Scot Commander
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/Spitfire.jpg)
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 475 Location: Tintern, Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There#s quite a wide variation between tug weaponry; the Klingons, Kzintis and Lyrans armed their Tugs and LTTs quite heavily (but had non-combat versions of their tug as well) whereas the Feds, Gorns (exception HDT), and Hydrans armed theirs quite lightly. Not really sure why - there might be some sort of philosophical reason? _________________ Nothing is quite as persuasive as a disruptor pistol on slow burn and a rotisserie...... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
ecs05norway Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It might also be economical reasons. Phasers and photons and such cost money, and the Federation has a lot of pressure to spend money on non-Starfleet issues, whereas in more militarized cultures like the Klingons, the Fleet has a lot more sway over the national budget. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4074 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd go with empires' outlooks, but express it differently.
Empires like the Klingons and Romulans accentuate military prowress, so even tugs are expected to fight. You have to arm the ships so they can contribute to the battle and the captains have a chance for glory.
Empires like the Federation and Gorns know the value of the cargo tugs carry. The don't want to give their tug captains an excuse to fight, but rather be incented to flee. Better to keep them effectively unarmed and lose a few to surprises, than to arm them and risk losing all of them to glory seeking captains. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|