Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Freighter Design
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OGOPTIMUS
Captain


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 980

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:33 am    Post subject: Freighter Design Reply with quote

How are freighters physically designed in the SFU?

They look like standard Fed cargo pods with some small wraparound bits.

Are they permanently hooked up or hardwired like that? So all goods/whatever they're carrying have to be transported via transporter from one place to another?

Or are they more like a Tarhe helicopter, very small and most of the mass is a removable cargo pod? So that this way they could transfer the pod from freighter to Light Tactical Transport to Tug and all the way back.

The latter seems more efficient to me, but then, nobody besides the Feds uses cargo pods like that.

Or are the graphics and miniatures of freighters meant to be "generic" and some look like they're wrapped around Kzinti, Klingon, or whatever type of pods?
_________________
O.G. OPTIMUS


Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4069
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Normal freighters (and armed freighters, but not auxiliaries or Q-ships) are made to do exactly what you suggestion: they can pull themselves apart to detach the pods. The various "surround" on freighters says that is their normal operation: They go from point A to point B with their pod. When they get to B, they leave their pod there and get a new pod to go to C (or back to A).

Also, those are "civilian" pods, not Federation pods. Civilian pods contain 25 boxes of cargo. Federation pods contain 32 boxes of cargo. (Klingon and Kzinti pods contain 24 boxes of cargo.) Civilian pods can be carried by tugs and LTTs. Likewise military cargo pods can be carried by freighters. (There are some movement penalties if, say, a freighter carries a Fed cargo pod or a Klingon tug carries a civilian pod, but they can still do it.)
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wolverin61
Commander


Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 495
Location: Mississippi

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. Never knew all that, except for the freighters being able to swap pods.
_________________
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3412
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They all function the same, but look different (but there isn't much point in doing freighters that just "look" different).

The Gorn cargo pods are flattened discs (like on their warships), the Klingon pods are elongated rectangles with the rear ends pinched to a point, the Kzinti pods are elongated hexagons, etc.

In the end, it's all just a shape that holds the same number of cargo boxes (at least on freighters and tugs).
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike
Fleet Captain


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 1675
Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A bunch of that info must have come from SFB. Which products?
_________________
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wedge_hammersteel
Commander


Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 578
Location: Lafayette, LA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would like to see a picture of pallets on a Lyran mini.

I have been pming Scoutdad about this. He gave me some ideas of how to attach them. I bought 2 pallets for my Lyran mini. Thats 4 squares.

A pallet is 2 squares tied by a metal bar.

Scoutdad said he bought some at origins but has not put them together.

Anyone have a picture that could be posted?

The pallets have slanted edges and I dont know which is the top and bottom.


/-----------\ is this how they look (slant wise) or is it upside down?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike wrote:
A bunch of that info must have come from SFB. Which products?

Most of it would probably have come from the R-1.0 section of the SFB Basic set.
The rest (i.e., size and shape of pods) can be determined by looking at the minis.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wedge_hammersteel wrote:
I would like to see a picture of pallets on a Lyran mini.

I'll email you a photo tonight...

Quote:
The pallets have slanted edges and I dont know which is the top and bottom.

/-----------\ is this how they look (slant wise) or is it upside down?

The wide end goes against the hull of the ship.


' _______ ..........._______
/_______\_____/_______\ :Lyran Ship
\_______/--------\_______/ :Lyran Pod
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
wedge_hammersteel
Commander


Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 578
Location: Lafayette, LA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks. I had it upside down. I look forward to the picture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ravenhull
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 231
Location: Mobile, AL

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of the 'flavor' about pods comes from a couple of Captain's Log articles. There was one article that had a few alternate SSD's imbedded that showed things like a Gorn disc freighter and one that had all the freighter hardware in the back and only the pod out front. All of them were functionally identical to the classic freighter, so there was no need to make 40 odd SSDs.
_________________
NOLI UMQUAM VIM TURBARUM STULTORUM DEPRETIARE.

Donovan Willett, USS Alabama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Sneaky Scot
Commander


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 475
Location: Tintern, Monmouthshire

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recall that in SFB freighters could travel in "ballast" mode, without any cargo pods. This was a very rare occurence, as moving a ship like this doesn't do anything except cost the owner money for operation and maintenance. Because it's a rare occurence, I guess we don't need to be able to see that in Fed Cdr.
_________________
Nothing is quite as persuasive as a disruptor pistol on slow burn and a rotisserie......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3412
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can do that anytime you like. Simply ignore the cargo boxes on the ship card and you are there. The only SSD's for freighters "in-ballast" in SFB were just diagrams in an article in Captains Log (IIRC) without the play-data. I don't recall any discussion of changes in movement costs, etc. (and, since it's so rare, why bother).
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose you could also do that on an MB?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3412
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sure. It gets tricky with what the point-value should be though. On a target like a freighter it probably matters not. On a base, it might matter more.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
OGOPTIMUS
Captain


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 980

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You'd have to ignore a lot more than just cargo on a mobile base though wouldn't you? I mean, the thing is made of 6 pods and not much else. The superstructure/basilica in the center is rather small.

Though, I think there are rules in SFB for using 2 to 6 pods. Sort of like building a base up from scratch. Each pods adds something to the base, like extra weapons and such, if I remember correctly.

Hmmmm.

Might make an interesting mini campaign....
_________________
O.G. OPTIMUS


Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group