Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Photon/Hellbore preload question
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mojo jojo
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 340

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:45 pm    Post subject: Photon/Hellbore preload question Reply with quote

Can a ship choose to preload only a few photons/hellbores before the game starts in order to retain more power in batteries? For example, if a ship has 4 photons and 5 batteries, can it choose to preload 1 and retain 3 power or preload 2 and retain 1 power in batteries?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I'm not certain I see the reasoning behind that choice, I'd say that you could do that.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. The preload is an "all-or-nothing" affair. (Honestly, I don't think that scenario was even thought of.)
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hod K'el
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Location: Lafayette LA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can it be all or nothing if you do not have the power to load all four photons? (Yep, you confused me again...which is pretty easy to do nowadays.)

And come to think about it, I thought the objective was a simplified game...so why allow preloading at all?

And why do I not get to preload disruptors, then choose later to overload or not? And do not give me any garbage about multiple turn arming because my plasmas are multiple arming also, so do they fit in with 'all or nothing'?

And now this begs why I cannot preload a suicide shuttle?

The people that CHOOSE to take a Hydran or Fed ship know what they are getting into, which is why I disagree with the preloading rule.
_________________
HoD K'el
IMV Black Dagger
-----------------
Life is not victory;
Death is not defeat!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, let's go slowly.

The whole point of pre-loading is to allow ships with two-turn arming weapons the ability to fire the weapon on the first turn of the scenario. That is it. As compensation for this tactical advantage, you suffer the tactical disadvantage of having empty batteries.

You aren't really getting free energy. Instead, it is assumed that the ship spent the normal amount of arming energy on turn 0. So, our Fed CA with four photons and four batteries still spent eight points of energy to pre-load the photons on turn 0. It doesn't just spend the four points of energy in the batteries. However, the batteries are assumed empty, as the ship is spending all of its available energy to pre-load the photons and get to the scenario as quickly as possible.

By "all or nothing" I am referring to pre-loading specific weapons. You either pre-load all of your photons/hellbores/ion cannons, or none of them. You can't pre-load one photon, and leave the rest unloaded.

You can't pre-load suicide shuttles because they are single-turn arming weapons.

Finally, you can pre-load disruptors. No problem. Of course, your disruptors will have been discharged at the end of turn 0, so the only effect of pre-loading disruptors is you have empty batteries. But, if you want to pre-load disruptors, more power to you.

Besides, single-turn arming weapons have their own advantage over multi-turn arming weapons: Single-turn arming weapons don't use energy until the moment of fire. Multi-turn arming weapons must commit to arming during energy allocation. This is a non-trivial advantage.

As you say, people who CHOOSE disruptor armed ships know what they are getting into. It is all tactical trade-offs. Choose the ones you are most comfortable with.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mojo jojo
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 340

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, how about if an Orion ship has a mix of Hellbores/Photons. Can it choose to preload ONLY the Hellbores or ONLY the Photons and leave the other weapon system empty to save power on batteries?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike:
OK, I can see that... maybe you only had enough energy left over at the end of hypothetical Turn 0 to pre-load one Photon Torpedo; so you load it and there's nothing left for batteries...

Mojo:
Based on Mike's explanation of hte all-or-nothing preloading, I'm gonna guess that the hypothetical HB/PHOT question has the same answer - all or nothing.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Mike
Fleet Captain


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 1675
Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MJWest wrote:
Quote:
But, if you want to pre-load disruptors, more power to you.


Wouldn't that be...LESS power to you??? Wink
_________________
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hod K'el
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Location: Lafayette LA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scoutdad wrote:
Mike:
OK, I can see that... maybe you only had enough energy left over at the end of hypothetical Turn 0 to pre-load one Photon Torpedo; so you load it and there's nothing left for batteries...


Ah! Light at the end of the tunnel! Exactly! I am running a O-BR w/ 3 Photons. I want to preload two to have on turn one and start loading the 3rd photon on turn one to rotate firing (2-1-2-1, etc.), so I take exception to the all-or-nothing rule. Why should I pay holding cost for a torpedo that I don't want to fully charge, but the rules say I must? Am I the captain of my ship or is MW? Am I a pirate or do I play nice guy?

Scoutdad wrote:
Mojo:
Based on Mike's explanation of hte all-or-nothing preloading, I'm gonna guess that the hypothetical HB/PHOT question has the same answer - all or nothing.


The same arguement can be made here. If I am going up against, say, a Lyran and do not want to prearm my Hellbore, why should I be forced to arm it? By the same token, I would definitely want to arm my photons, and play long range shoot & scoot. So, again, why all-or-nothing? Why do the Orions get punished?
_________________
HoD K'el
IMV Black Dagger
-----------------
Life is not victory;
Death is not defeat!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, I will send the appeal to Steve.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
storeylf
Fleet Captain


Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 1897

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was so much simpler when it was a use all the battery, then it would be a pointless question.

Its what happens when you tweak the rules for a few corner cases, and before long people want more exceptions, or rules added to allow x, y or z. Bang goes the FC keep it simple in a paragraph, and in comes the SFB style exception 1.1.2.a and condition 3.3.4. etc all in the name of 'realism'.

Please keep it as it is, all or nothing, as hod says - you know what you are getting into when you choose a ship/weapons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hod K'el wrote:
Ah! Light at the end of the tunnel! Exactly! I am running a O-BR w/ 3 Photons. I want to preload two to have on turn one and start loading the 3rd photon on turn one to rotate firing (2-1-2-1, etc.), so I take exception to the all-or-nothing rule. Why should I pay holding cost for a torpedo that I don't want to fully charge, but the rules say I must? Am I the captain of my ship or is MW? Am I a pirate or do I play nice guy?


Everything else being equal, let me please call BS on this. Even if you want to fire your photons in a 2-1-2-1 spread (which, quite frankly, boggles the mind), you are still better off coming in will all pre-loaded.

If you come in with all three pre-loaded, then you pay 2+2+2 this turn to complete arming. Next turn you pay 1+2+2 to hold the remaining photon, and start loading the two you fired.

If you come in with two pre-loaded and one empty, you pay 2+2+2 this turn to complete arming on the first two and start arming the third one. Next turn you pay 2+2+2 to finish arming the third one, and start loading the two you fired.

So, I just saved you a whole point of power on your third turn. The only possible reason I think of wanting to leave the third weapon empty is because you know you will not be able to control your impulses and will fire it with the other two. And if that really were the case (which I am sure it isn't), then, no, you shouldn't be the captain of your own ship! Wink

Hod K'el wrote:
The same arguement can be made here. If I am going up against, say, a Lyran and do not want to prearm my Hellbore, why should I be forced to arm it? By the same token, I would definitely want to arm my photons, and play long range shoot & scoot. So, again, why all-or-nothing? Why do the Orions get punished?

Actually, there is no disadvantage here at all. If you really don't want the hellbore on the first turn, just don't arm it. The partially loaded hellbore is harmlessly discharged at no energy cost. There is no difference at all in the turn one energy allocation.

And, let's assume you just wanted to start the first turn of arming on turn one. Well, if all are pre-loaded, then you pay 2+2+3 to finish arming the photons and hellbores. Which, incidentally, is exactly the same amount of power it would take to finish the arming of the photons are start arming on the hellbore. Only except this time you get the choice of whether to fire on turn one or not.

So, my ruling provides you with more tactical flexibility at zero energy cost to you. In fact, with the three photons I am actually saving you energy on the second turn. So, how, exactly, have I harmed you and your little BR in any of this?
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

storeylf wrote:
It was so much simpler when it was a use all the battery, then it would be a pointless question.

Well, unfortunately, the "border case" you mention was very necessary. It was totally outrageous to force a BATS to completely empty its batteries just to arm one or two photons or hellbores. It was needed.

However, I do agree that the battery cost should be completely consistent regardless of the number of weapons pre-loaded. And, with that assumption, there is no reason to not do "all-or-nothing" as it imposes no relevant limitations on Turn 1 operations.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hod K'el
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Location: Lafayette LA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because I am using two points of battery that I don't have on Turn 0. So where does that power come from? If it is all or nothing, then it is always nothing.
_________________
HoD K'el
IMV Black Dagger
-----------------
Life is not victory;
Death is not defeat!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4073
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hod K'el wrote:
Because I am using two points of battery that I don't have on Turn 0. So where does that power come from? If it is all or nothing, then it is always nothing.

Afraid I am not following you here. Let's get back to your example ...

You said you wanted to pre-load two photons and not pre-load a third photon. Even if you could "save" energy like mojo jojo wanted, you would still have empty batteries because the Orion BR has four batteries. So, whether you pre-load two photons or three photons, your batteries are still empty. No big deal. No difference in starting position.

Now, it could be different if you only pre-loaded a single photon. But, at that point, the single pre-load is little threat, and really isn't that much different that just coming in with no pre-loads and full batteries.

But again, if you pre-load multi-turn arming weapons, your batteries are empty. (Subject to the cap given in (4C2c).) Changing that buys very little benefit, and a lot more rules cruft. It cost just doesn't seem worth the benefit.

BTW, I am also a little confused. At first you were insulted by the very existence of the "Pre-Game Arming" rule. Now you are insisting on expanding the rule. Don't get it.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group