Federation Commander

[Millenniumfalsehood]

Did anyone else besides me see the NCL-style saucer in the Kelvin and her sister ships?

When I first saw that ship flying onto the screen, with it's two-deck structure with circular sections followed by a long rectangular tail, I thought for the briefest of seconds that it was the Kearsarge-class! Then when I saw the star dock with all those ships surrounding it, I could have sworn I saw the Kearsarge docked with the station.

After I got the DVD I found out that none of the ships in that scene had the same configuration as the NCL, but it was an interesting thought.

Makes me want to get one of the resin JJVerse Federation ships and do an NCL conversion.
_________________
"I'm invincible!"

"You're a loony."

[djdood]

I didn't draw the parallel when I saw it, but I can see what you are talking about.

The JJ-verse ships are certainly a new take on things, with some traditional ideas mixed-in. I'm still (still!) absorbing the new aesthetic, but it is slowly growing on me.

I *hated* Doug Drexler's NX-01 Enterprise for a long time. By the time of the third season, I had accepted it on its own merits. I grew to like it later, when Drexler started posting details and explanations on why it was the way it was. There really was a process and it was the best result of a difficult set of circumstances.
_________________

[OGOPTIMUS]

I recall seeing the movie and thinking that several ships appeared to take inspiration from ADB. I swear I saw something looking like a war destroyer running around there.

I too am not completely enamored with the new look of everything, but it is what it is, and if I try and view it without preconceptions, it all works.

I hope we get to see some more ships in the next movie. I hate when the art guys tease us with sot of other ships for just a few seconds, unfocused shots, and bad camera angles. I know I could go and buy the "art" book for the new movie, but there's something to be said about seeing it on the screen.
_________________
O.G. OPTIMUS


Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page

[ericphillips]

I am not a big fan of the new looks for the ships either. I really liked the movie, however!

My main problems arr the nacelles and the bridge. I mean, the bridge looks more like a high end hair style shop than a bridge.

The other thing is the size of the Enterprise. it is really big. As large as the Enterprise-E. Did you see all those shuttle is the shuttle bay? Its more like DN size than a CA.

I thought the shuttles looked awesome. Great design. I also liked the new transporter effect. And the revised neck of the Klingon ship (hard to see on screen) is really cool and militaristic.

And Karl Urban rules as Dr. McCoy.

[pinecone]

I loved the movie, though there was a (serious) lack of consistency. And I liked the New ship designs, except for one thing. The Warp Nacells. The "Caps" should be red. They always have been, they always should be. The Blue makes it look like a CF without the Arrow saucer. And that is ugly.

[djdood]

Enterprise-B had blue (not that it was "right" on that ship either; there's a lot wrong with the "B").
_________________

[pinecone]

The Enterprise B waas an excelsior, not a constitution.

[djdood]

Never said it was. What does it not being a Constitution-class have to do with our discussion on the JJ-verse kitbash ships?
_________________

[Bolo_MK_XL]

Excelsior used Trans-Warp --- whether or not that would have been worked out by the time that Enterprise was designed ---

[DirkSJ]

[ericphillips]

[terryoc]

Shuttles aren't lifeboats in the SFU, although they can be used as such. They're fully capable of long range travel themselves, carrying cargo, doing scientific research with their sensors etc. You don't need all those capabilities in a lifeboat. For the most part, any evacuations would be done by "escape pods" (tiny little things with no real propulsion of their own) or transporter.
_________________
"Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West

[Mike]

I think that in TOS they were trying to emphasize the fact that transporter technology had been developed to such a dependable level that there wasn't much need for smaller shuttles.
_________________
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.

[ericphillips]

[JimDauphinais]

The JJ movie brought me to this party. It was the first movie in years that I saw twice in the theatres. It got me excited about trek again (I had stopped following it in the late-TNG/DS9 era). It also inspired me to purchase and watch the TOS blu-rays. That in turn sparked a vague memory of an old Consimworld conversation about there being a simpler remake of SFB (I had never played SFB despite being a wargamer back to the late 70s).

I found FC and ADB on the internet, but I was hesitant to take the plunge. I then downloaded the excellent FC:First Missions freebie and gave it a try. It very quickly overcame my hesistance about taking the plunge (at least for FC:KB).

Then I found out my regular wargaming opponent was an ex-SFB player. He decided to give FC:KB a try with me. The next thing I know we are trying the game out with a bunch of other folks we play games with here in the St. Louis area and the game becomes the new top dog for us. Within nine months I bought everything except the minis and the pre-#37 Captain's Logs (well, actually, I did buy the first three squadron boxes).
_________________
Jim Dauphinais, Chesterfield, MO

St. Louis Area Fed Comm Group: http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/STL_Federation_Commander/