Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

JJVerse Trek and SFU . . .
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buy Captians Log 36, you wont regret it. It was my first captian's log, and I'd say the best one that I have yet.

Oh, and Djdood, my point was that by the time the Enterprise-A came out, the warp naccels really were'nt designed the smae way. But this movie took place before that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That was kind of a non-sequitur, pinecone, which is why I was thrown.

The JJ-verse movie has no ship-tech connections to the previous movies whatsoever.

There is no lineage in the ship designs. The classic Matt Jefferies 1701 (the one in the SFU) did not happen in the JJ-verse (in lieu of the new Ryan Church 1701, which liberally borrowed from the classic, the movie -A, and the TNG -D).

Because they "started over", all the later movie ships won't happen either (at least not the same way). No 1701-A, Excelsior, Grissom, etc.

The stardock ships in the JJ movie are the best indication of where his design camp is headed. Based on the drawings in the art book and stills from the flick, those are all kissing cousins of the Kelvin from the movie. Some of them definitely echo some obvious and good ideas (they have a Reliant/SFU-NCL arrangement, etc.).
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ericphillips
Commander


Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 702
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What blows my mind is that Star Trek: Enterprise was before the change in the timeline. However, because the time war happened based on future participants (years after TNG), and the temporal incursion by Nero happened before the time war participants were born, did people from the new future make their own time war, and if so did this make an alternate past, separate from the original past. OH, MY HEAD HURTS.

Seriously, looking at the movie and the differences, even before the temporal incursion, I really think that Spock didn't just travel in time, but into a parallel universe that was close, but with several differences, to the main universe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't strain yourself trying to make Trek continuity make sense. The writers certainly didn't strain themselves too much... Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing

Nero made his own Alternate reality. The temporal Cold war was already over by then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing

Nero made his own Alternate reality. The temporal Cold war was fought in the original reality. At least that's what I think Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ericphillips
Commander


Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 702
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, the temporal cold war started in the future, which hasn't happened yet in the JJ Verse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, but Nero made his own realitiy where (for all we know) there was no temporal cold war.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ericphillips
Commander


Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 702
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly. As I said, that might have created an alternate past in the new timeline where the history of Enterprise NX-01 is different because the temporal cold war either did not happen, or happened differently because of the changes. Its non-intuitive, but this is a case where you change the future to change the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ugh. All this time travel / parallel universe talk makes my head hurt.

I think I'm just going to go watch Sliders... Confused
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
pinecone
Fleet Captain


Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 1862
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe in that timeline they saw what nero did and though "Hmm, maybe this isn't such a good idea." Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ericphillips
Commander


Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 702
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really, I wish the timeline of ENT would change to erase the temporal cold war. It turned out to be a lame story and a bad ending. I would enjoy the series more if it went away. Lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Savedfromwhat
Commander


Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 657

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps we aren't seeing the effects of neros incursion in stXI but instead we are seeing the effects of the temporal cold war on the timeline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OGOPTIMUS
Captain


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 980

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinecone wrote:
Buy Captians Log 36, you wont regret it. It was my first captian's log, and I'd say the best one that I have yet.


I'd say buy them all. I have (finally found #17), and I'm not disappointed at all. Even those issues that don't have a lot of my 'favorite' things are still top notch and well worth purchasing.
_________________
O.G. OPTIMUS


Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congrats on finding #17. That was my last issue I was missing, for a long time, until I found my copy in '07.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group