View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ericphillips Commander
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 702 Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:05 am Post subject: Federation Admiral- Feature Question |
|
|
Will Federation Admiral have any kind of abstract battle resolution system to determine the outcome of battles without fully playing them (similar to F&E's battle system).
This is important to me, because of one, some, or all of the following:
A) Some battles are too lopsided to play out in Fed Com.
B) I prefer to play the most important battles only in Fed Com.
C) Players are too busy with real life to battle it out in Fed Com, but we want to keep the strategery going and not let the game stagnate.
Thanks!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eric:
Yes. There is an abstracted combat resolution system included in Fed Ad. It goes by the very inventive, yet highly descriptive acronym: FACRS [Federation Admiral Combat Resolution System] - or at least it did in playtest version 1.0.
During the couple of small scale playtest campaigns we did, we used Fed Comm to fight battles and then refought them using the abstracted system. While their was not a direct corelation, the results were similar enough to satify us that the system was indeed viable. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ericphillips Commander
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 702 Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sol, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Universe Beta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds great, Tony. Exactly what I was hoping for. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
terryoc Captain
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1386
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe it's based on the Victory By Any Means engine's Campaign Scale Combat Resolution system (CSCR). I prefer to call it that; I personally feel that saying "see ess see ahr" is a lot less likely to cause offense than yelling "Fakers!!" _________________ "Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Terry: You are correct. It is based on the CSRS. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mwaschak Lieutenant JG
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite right! The quick combat system takes up a few pages of the main FA book, and is VERY similar to the one we use in VBAM's First Edition Campaign Guide.
Obviously it lacks the details of a real game of Federation Commander, but you get to make some meaningful decisions before the battle begins and it can resolve battles very quickly.
-Jay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|