View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jean Site Admin

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1732
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:58 am Post subject: Federation New Heavy Cruiser (NCA) |
|
|
SVC notes: Presumably, Sandrine's fixes to the NCL also apply to the NCA
Moved phaser-3s to bottom of saucer.
Removed plates under phaser bubbles.
Will fix the shuttle bay and make it connect to the garage on the NCL.
top
side
above
above front
below
top
 _________________ Business Manager/RPG Line Editor
Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
phdillman Lieutenant SG

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very nice! Sandrine is very talented.
Now to me the late GW ships can use some deviation of the clasic design to bring out that WOW factor that Mongoose is looking for. To wit, the small secondary hull and engine mount could be made larger, maybe even use that superstructure from the first draft of the CC on the bottom of the saucer and mount the third engine to that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djdood Commodore

Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3410 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My comments are all over on the legacy bbs.
For the benefit of those folks here that aren't there, here's the picture I put together with my comment markups -
NCA Comments Markup Drawing
SVC has already replied and said the sensor dishes will be the way Mongoose feels they need to do them. Not a huge loss, as they are easy to cut off and replace, should the person choose to (and I likely will). I'm more concerned about features that are molded-in and hard to change. _________________
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jean Site Admin

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1732
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Take 2.
SVC notes: It should be good to go except for the phaser-3s on the bottom of the saucer.
side
rear
below
front
above rear
above front
top
Enjoy! _________________ Business Manager/RPG Line Editor
Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MacrossMartin Ensign
Joined: 17 Sep 2011 Posts: 16 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
That looks like it could hurt somebody... _________________ "The belief in the possibility of a short, decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of Klingon illusions." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aabh Lieutenant SG

Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 134 Location: Arvada, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now THAT's a beauty! (And the reason I'm back in SFB is because of this ship! ) Secondary hull is much better... it might stand to be a little beefier, but I think that's just fine. I still feel the sensor dish might be a little small... But That might be just fine as well!
It's a beauty no matter how you slice her!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ctchapel Lieutenant JG

Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 84 Location: Federal Way, WA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
The aft hull still looks under sized to me, but if that's it, okay fine. Let's do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
phdillman Lieutenant SG

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Much better! I think after the Ph-3 gets fixed and maybe a few more panals tothe shuttle bay door that this is a keeper! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Lewis Lieutenant SG

Joined: 25 Mar 2011 Posts: 121 Location: Campbell, CA USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tony, Will, anyone....
I'm all but finished painting my Starline 2500 NCA, but I wonder what the two raised circular details here on the aft bulkhead represent.
Are they Tractors? Sensors? Flush vents for ejecting Tribbles? _________________ Jim Lewis
GunTruck Studios
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
koogie Lieutenant JG

Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Likely the two drone racks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djdood Commodore

Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3410 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nope. Not the drone racks. Those are tucked up under the "wings" of the engine support "yoke".
For my minis, I'll be painting these little cylinders gray and calling them vents. The NCL has the same number of tractors and doesn't have these features. _________________
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scoutdad Commodore

Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the Starline 2500 range of Federation miniatures, drone racks are raised squares with a circular divot in the exact center where the drone tube is.
These are most likely extra details added for appearance. On mine, they will be called vents and painted appropriately. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Lewis Lieutenant SG

Joined: 25 Mar 2011 Posts: 121 Location: Campbell, CA USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank Guys!
Mine shall be grey Vents too! _________________ Jim Lewis
GunTruck Studios
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aabh Lieutenant SG

Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 134 Location: Arvada, Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I painted them as nav lights, Red/Green. Just a thought.  _________________
-------
Guy Davis |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|