View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jean Site Admin

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1727
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aabh Lieutenant SG

Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 134 Location: Arvada, Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is more what folks are talking about on Facebook:
(With deepest apologies to Sandrine!)
The lower nacelles with the normal neck looks conspicuous, a lower neck streamlines the ship.  _________________
-------
Guy Davis |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sgt_G Commander

Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 539 Location: Offutt AFB, Nebraska
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like that. It looks much sleeker with the shorter neck. _________________ Garth L. Getgen
Master Sgt, US Air Force, Retired -- 1981-2007 -- 1W091A |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Lewis Lieutenant SG

Joined: 25 Mar 2011 Posts: 121 Location: Campbell, CA USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ditto - I like the shorter neck too. From this view, the ship looks fast and sleek. _________________ Jim Lewis
GunTruck Studios
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djdood Commodore

Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3406 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The battlecruiser does the same thing though and it will always have the full-height neck. _________________
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|