STAR FLEET BATTLES

ERRATA

Star Fleet Battles Errata: Module E3

(E107.0) States that megaphasers and the Borak do not exist in the normal Star Fleet Battles universe. Data in this product indicates that the Borak did exist in the Early Years time frame (as an empire with warships) that operated W and Y ships which were armed with an early version of the megaphaser.

(G52.0) Note that with the Borak, this system is not simulator only, they actually had turreted ships in the Early Years period.

(RB100.6) SCS: SSD: This ship is missing the "Repair is destroyed on 'Cargo' damage points" and the "Repair boxes can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" notes.

(RB100.9) BCS: SSD: This ship is missing the "Repair is destroyed on 'Cargo' damage points" and the "Repair boxes can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" notes.

(RB100.15) CF: RULE: Delete the word "on" from the text ". . . and one on that . . ."

(RB100.16) CV: SSD: This ship should have Fighter-Destroyer-Cs, a Jammer-B and Hunter-Killer-Ds.

(RB100.20) TUG: SSD: This ship is displaying the "old" Hunter-Killer-B fighter SSDs and data. It should be displaying Hunter-Killer-D fighter SSDs and data. [The fighter SSDs are showing two phaser-2s instead of one phaser-2 and one phaser-3.]

(RB100.25) P-P: SSD: This ship is missing the "Repair boxes can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.29) P-V: SSD: The carrier pod is displaying the "old" Hunter-Killer-B fighter SSDs and data. It should be displaying Hunter-Killer-D fighter SSDs and data. [The fighter SSDs are showing two phaser-2s instead of one phaser-2 and one phaser-3.] (The second squadron SSD is also displaying the "old" Hunter-Killer-B SSDs.)

(RB100.33) CLB: SSD: Phasers are mislabeled, skipping #4 and going directly from #3 to #5.

(RB100.37) PFT: SSD: This ship is missing the "Repair boxes can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.44) CVE: SSD: This ship should have Fighter-Destroyer-Cs and Hunter-Killer-Ds.

(RB100.45) PFTL: SSD: This ship is missing the "Repair boxes can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.53) SB: SSD: This base is missing the "Repair is destroyed on 'Cargo' damage points" and the "Repair boxes on PF docking modules can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" notes.

(RB100.54) STB: SSD: This base is missing the "Repair boxes on PF docking modules can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.55) BATS: SSD: This base is missing the "Repair boxes on PF docking modules can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.56) BS: SSD: This base is missing the "Repair boxes on PF docking modules can only repair damage to PFs (K2.611)" note.

(RB100.58) L-Q: SSD: This ship should be updated to use Hunter-Killer-Ds.

(RB100.59) S-Q: SSD: This ship should be updated to use Hunter-Killer-Ds. (RB100.F14) JAMMER-A (JM-A): RULE: last sentence of first paragragh should read: "The fighter gave up its heavy, rear-mounted phaser-2 to accommodate the electronic warfare pods, though a phaser-3 tail gun was retained." (No FA phaser-3 was removed from the Fighter-Destroyer-B to add the rear-firing phaser-3).

(RB100.F34) BOMBER-D (BM-D): SSD: The SSD shows two phaser-2s and two phaser-3s in the FA position when it should only be three phaser-2s.

(RB100.F4) MEGAFIGHTERS: RULE: The SSD for FD-CM should not have a FA phaser-2 on it (RX phaser-2 is hidden).

(YRB100.7) YFF: RULE: The text is cut short at the end with the words ". . . because it was cheap, and the", the missing text is ". . . y were easier to replace than larger ships."

Annex #3: (RB100.4) The ship designation for this unit on the MSC is DN, it should be DNW.

Annex #4: All of reference numbers (last column) are off by a count of twenty in relation to the corresponding fighter in Module E3.

Annex #4: (FD100.F24) The MFC has the wrong weapons data displayed for the BM-DM it is showing BM-CMs (FD100.F23) instead of BM-DMs.

[Table of Contents][Next]

Copyright 1991,1998 Amarillo Design Bureau, All Rights Reserved

Updated 30 August 1998