"why not develop modularity for the resource savings instead of having to build more ships?"
Then by your logic EVERYBODY should have modular ships in the REAL universe.
No, I was right the first time, early Paravian help means no moularity.
Modularity would make sense for all of the races, and ...
Search found 38 matches
- Sat May 03, 2014 9:05 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: alt universe paravian ?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 40839
- Tue Apr 29, 2014 5:58 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: alt universe paravian ?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 40839
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:27 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: alt universe paravian ?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 40839
- Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:20 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Module X2
- Replies: 23
- Views: 79403
- Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:26 pm
- Forum: Miniatures
- Topic: What scale should a Star Base be?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 17251
Going smaller than 1/4 scale might make the model look far too odd next to the normal ships that are supposed to dock inside it.
Going larger than 1/4 scale would make measuring ranges odd, as by game scale, they should still be coming from the center point of the model.
While it could be fun to ...
Going larger than 1/4 scale would make measuring ranges odd, as by game scale, they should still be coming from the center point of the model.
While it could be fun to ...
- Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:26 pm
- Forum: Starline 2500
- Topic: News about the future of the 2500s
- Replies: 68
- Views: 194802
I've never seen a demo program that could match what people could make simply working at a real job. Some sound close to minimum wage, but they tend to have strings attached, and rarely account for the extra time needed to do a demo right.
Anyone doing demos should be doing them because they like ...
Anyone doing demos should be doing them because they like ...
- Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:25 am
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Powerista for SFB
- Replies: 0
- Views: 8278
Powerista for SFB
Jean's new toy looks rather interesting for a Fralli ship.
Are there any plans to put out an SFB SSD for the ship for more target practice for exciting SFB action?
Are there any plans to put out an SFB SSD for the ship for more target practice for exciting SFB action?
- Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:11 pm
- Forum: Prime Directive
- Topic: Which System to go with?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 28659
- Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:29 pm
- Forum: Prime Directive
- Topic: Which System to go with?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 28659
- Tue Oct 22, 2013 1:51 pm
- Forum: Prime Directive
- Topic: Which System to go with?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 28659
- Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:33 am
- Forum: Prime Directive
- Topic: Which System to go with?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 28659
I prefer GURPS. While it has a reputation for being an engineer's rule system, it isn't that difficult, especially with the more streamlined 4th edition.
It carries the advantage of being skill based instead of level based, as is found with the Traveller system coming soon. That allows people to ...
It carries the advantage of being skill based instead of level based, as is found with the Traveller system coming soon. That allows people to ...
- Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:10 pm
- Forum: A Call to Arms Star Fleet
- Topic: Damage Comparisons Between FC and ACTA-SF
- Replies: 174
- Views: 346278
I've always enjoy playing Klingons with the weak rear shields, as it makes them more of a challenge.
That issue, though, didn't really exist by the time of the General War. The B refit started Y165, and it's noted most ships had the refit by the start of the war in Y168, with virtually all of them ...
That issue, though, didn't really exist by the time of the General War. The B refit started Y165, and it's noted most ships had the refit by the start of the war in Y168, with virtually all of them ...
- Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:23 pm
- Forum: A Call to Arms Star Fleet
- Topic: Damage Comparisons Between FC and ACTA-SF
- Replies: 174
- Views: 346278
Which would fit, but would also mean most of the ships would qualify for the rule.
Looking at the two I noted, the Klingon D7B is 30 fore and 22 everywhere else, and the Federation CA is 30 fore, 24 fore sides, and 20 all three rear facings, with the CA+ 30 fore and 24 everywhere else. The Gorn CA ...
Looking at the two I noted, the Klingon D7B is 30 fore and 22 everywhere else, and the Federation CA is 30 fore, 24 fore sides, and 20 all three rear facings, with the CA+ 30 fore and 24 everywhere else. The Gorn CA ...
- Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:04 pm
- Forum: A Call to Arms Star Fleet
- Topic: Damage Comparisons Between FC and ACTA-SF
- Replies: 174
- Views: 346278
- Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:44 pm
- Forum: Prime Directive
- Topic: Phasers and uniforms. Too wimpy?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 48928
That becomes a GM's call, then. When I run GURPS, I make sure people know what is allowed or not. I had one player who brouht in a combat knife using other GURPS books for the tech to our Prime Directive game. It could slice through heavy combat armor with ease. I simply said 'No.' as it does not ...