Question about Romulan Falcon

Discuss anything and everything about miniatures here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

wedge_hammersteel
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Lafayette, LA

Question about Romulan Falcon

Post by wedge_hammersteel »

I am looking for a ship card for the Falcon.

The miniature is listed in the store.
http://store.starfleetstore.com/merchan ... ry_Code=RM

However, the most recent ship card list shows the Falcon as a Mauler in Communique 18 and the miniature for future release.

Is the current Falcon mini going to be bashed to a mauler design?

If yes, then I assume there is no ship card for the regular Falcon? It would make for a good Communique ship card.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Burt:
Not sure what your question is.

The Falcon is a mauler ship... in fact, it's the original mauler.
Much as with the WarBird/WarEagle... the ship is built around the weapon.
The batteries, power connections and mauler cannon are contined within the body o the vessel. That's why there's not the outward appearance of the mauler as with the D6M / Terminator conversion where the mauler weapon was retro fitted to an existing ship.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
wedge_hammersteel
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Lafayette, LA

Post by wedge_hammersteel »

You answered my question. I thought the Falcon was a regular ship which was the reason for the current miniature. I didnt know it was initially built as a mauler. Thanks.
User avatar
Dal Downing
Commander
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Dal Downing »

Still kinda hoping we will see a King Falcon Mauler someday. Basiclly apply to a Falcon what makes a King Eagle not a War Eagle. 2-15 Box Warp Engines with a Plasma F and a Phaser 3 each. Now that ship scares me more than any D6M ever could. The only thing more frieghtening is firing on a Terminator and not killing it.... :shock:
-Dal

"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Maybe the Falcon will go the way the Hydran Pegasus did and "find" some other versions to take advantage of the mini. The Peg was "the Hydrans oddball PF tender", until its origins in a different function were found.
ImageImage
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

It wouldn't be that hard to do a version of the Falcon without a mauler, so the mini could be used, but the trick would be to do something "creative" not just something between a war eagle and a battle hawk.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
User avatar
Dan Ibekwe
Commander
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:06 pm
Location: Manchester UK

Post by Dan Ibekwe »

With all that reserve power the Falcon could be armed with a few tractor beams and be the strongest anchor in the Galaxy.

Or, if the Klingons could be persuaded to part with one, a Stasis Field Generator? (possibly easier to transfer a Falcon to the Klingons).
We are Hydrans! NO ONE LIKES US!
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

If you did a non-mauler Falcon, I would assume it would have the normal amount of batteries, not the mauler amount of batteries.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
User avatar
Dan Ibekwe
Commander
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:06 pm
Location: Manchester UK

Post by Dan Ibekwe »

Oh. I thought the Falcon was built around the power system for the mauler.

Without all those batteries, you're going to have a lot of internal volume freed up.

Perhaps a fast transport, with customised assault ship or repair tender variants.

Or a MY Romulan attempt at a 'fast' - or at any rate, faster - cruiser: the empty volume remains empty, dropping move cost to 0.75, and the ship carries one Pl-G and six FA Ph-1s?

Trying to be creative...
We are Hydrans! NO ONE LIKES US!
wedge_hammersteel
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Lafayette, LA

Post by wedge_hammersteel »

How about making aCommando Cruiser variant for the Falcon?

Its pretty close in point value to the Klink Commando Cruiser. The battery bays would make nice barracks and cargo along with some extra shuttle bays and other missing systems. The power generation looks similar to the Klink Commando Cruiser too.
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

When Steve mentioned being "creative", I don't think he meant looking for a non-combat role. Rather, I think he was looking for a combat variant that didn't just look like a WE.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
Rosencrantz
Ensign
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:49 pm

Post by Rosencrantz »

Hi,
This is in regard to F.C. I found the ship stats card for the Squadron version of the Falcon in Resources but I couldn't find a Fleet version of it. Does one exist and if so where would I find it?
Thanks
archon96
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:39 pm

Post by archon96 »

maybe give it three r type plasma launchers and heavy forward shields to use against hardened sites like Battle Stations.
Bill Stec
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:56 pm

Post by Bill Stec »

archon96 wrote:maybe give it three r type plasma launchers and heavy forward shields to use against hardened sites like Battle Stations.
I doubt that old hull could take the stress of more than one R-Torp.

Now replacing the R torp with 2 S-torps could be useful, especially if you used enveloping torps on a base.

Isn't there a Sparrowhawk variant that has 3 S torps for use against bases?
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

archon96 wrote:maybe give it three r type plasma launchers and heavy forward shields to use against hardened sites like Battle Stations.
Wont work.
The SFU flavor text for this ship describes the R launcher as being so largethe ship was effectively built around it.
Even with standardized parts and miniaturization - you're not going to get three R launchers inside a hull that size.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Post Reply