Federation Commander: Escalation!
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
then you'd each better win the first three rounds...wedge_hammersteel wrote:scoutdad, if you could pair me and Matt up only in the final match, that would be great.
I've currently got it set up as a four round, single elimination tree - but I may shift it and randomly pair the winners from each round rather than advance along a pre-determined tree.
Thoughts?
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Here's the initial tree, showing your opponent.
Once every one has submitted ships, I'll update this tree to include those as well.
Now I need a vote:
Do we run the tree as is?
Or do we randomly pair the winners from each round for the following round to prevent knowing who may or may not be in the finals?
For example, as Mike and I are in different round one matches, if we continue to win we will eventually face each other, but it's impossible to meet each other for the final as we are on the same side of the tree.

Once every one has submitted ships, I'll update this tree to include those as well.
Now I need a vote:
Do we run the tree as is?
Or do we randomly pair the winners from each round for the following round to prevent knowing who may or may not be in the finals?
For example, as Mike and I are in different round one matches, if we continue to win we will eventually face each other, but it's impossible to meet each other for the final as we are on the same side of the tree.

Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF
Waiting on six now. Ten are in. Funny, but at eight - we had no duplications. Each of the last two to submit were duplicates of a previous entry.malleman wrote:Okay, I am dying to know what everyone is flying. This is worse than Christmas night. How many are we waiting on?
I have sent emails or PMs to the hold-outs asking them to at least submit ships so we can open our presents.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF
Maybe a new rule should be slipped in:
Rule 69: The last player to submit his ship selection starts the game with 10 points of internal damage applied as a single volley.
One additional 10 piont volley will be added for each day he delays...

Rule 69: The last player to submit his ship selection starts the game with 10 points of internal damage applied as a single volley.
One additional 10 piont volley will be added for each day he delays...
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF