Question on Federation weapons doctrine

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Question on Federation weapons doctrine

Post by Kang »

In connection with a scenario idea I am working on, I wondered if I might ask this question regarding Federation weapons doctrine.

I seem to recall that, somewhere in the older SFB material, it mentioned (and I paraphrase) that the high destructive power of the Photon (especially when overloaded) is deliberate, because it will effectively deter potential enemies from attacking a Federation ship. This should therefore help the Feds in their altruistic goal of avoiding combat and bloodshed wherever possible.

Does anyone else remember that piece of doctrine?

And don't worry; the scenario I have in mind will still have lots of combat and bloodshed :twisted:
Image
User avatar
DNordeen
Commander
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:58 am

Post by DNordeen »

Don't remember it, but it sure sounds like the Utopian Fooled People.
Speed is life; Patience is victory

Image
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

The destructive power of photons never seems to discourage my opponents from attacking my Feds. :P
ImageImage
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

Don't remember that specifically, but I do remember "Non-violent combat" which always seemed oxymoronic to me.
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
archon96
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:39 pm

Post by archon96 »

yea just think if you could overload plasma, and the deterrent that would be from attacking Gorn.
User avatar
Sneaky Scot
Commander
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Tintern, Monmouthshire

Post by Sneaky Scot »

Tony,

I have the same recollection as you, but also recall that the Feds built their pre-war stuff to be able to take the enemy's best shot and still be able to cripple him with Photons afterwards. I don't think that philosophy applied to any of the war designs (NCA, NCL, DW) which were simply intended to go out there and thump things.
Nothing is quite as persuasive as a disruptor pistol on slow burn and a rotisserie......
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

Yeah Steve, I remember that too. In that way it was a similar philosophy to the Hydrans'.

I wonder if any of the 'old' 'old guard' will remember where my original question can be answered.....
Image
User avatar
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Bolo_MK_XL »

I wonder if any of the 'old' 'old guard' will remember where my original question can be answered.....
Been around SFU since '83, don't recall seeing anything about what you asked.

Could be your recalling something out of another gaming system about Star Trek (i.e. Fasa's version)
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

From another old-schooler (boughtthe zip-loc version in '80)... I do not recall ever reading that bit either.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Nerroth
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1722
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Nerroth »

It's not for the UFP, but there is a line in SFB Module Y2 in the rules covering how the Early Years ISC handles its progression to modern (TL12) technology in the event of an early "first contact". Specifically, the line is in the rules covering how long it takes for the Concordium to develop the plasmatic pulsar device:
(YR13.018) PLASMATIC PULSAR DEVICES: The Inter-Stellar Concordium cannot equip any ship, base, or other unit with PPDs until ten years after encountering another empire. The Inter-Stellar Concrodium was experimenting with aspects of this weapon design, but did not meld them all together into the PPD until confronted with the need for a heavy weapon that matched its altruistic proclivities.
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

I think there is a line somewhere about the destructive power of photons, but it was in reference to the reason the Feds considered them to be their "heavy weapons". I have no idea where I think I read that though. There's a whole lot of material, after 30 years.
ImageImage
User avatar
Darkwing
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:14 pm
Location: ZZ 9 plural Z A

Post by Darkwing »

At Bolo's suggestion I went and looked at the FASA material I have lying around and I did not see it in the Fed Ship Recognition Manual or the Combat Simulator game. I also checked the Starship Construction Manual and the main rule book, but did not find it. That doesn't mean it's not there somewhere or in another book I may not have.
The description sounded familiar so I think I, too, have seen it somewhere.
Let's get DANGEROUS!

Tice Leonard, U.S.S. Lexington & IKV Annihilation
User avatar
Mike
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1674
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by Mike »

I started playing SFB when the first boxed edition came out and do not remember ever seeing any text as described above.
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
User avatar
semperatis
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Glasgow,Scotland

Post by semperatis »

Could it possibly have appeared in the ship description section of the Tactics Manual. I no longer have a copy of it,so I can't check,but it does sound vaguely familiar. :?
Federal Republic of Aurora fleet builder.

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes.

Image
User avatar
Darkwing
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:14 pm
Location: ZZ 9 plural Z A

Post by Darkwing »

Good call, Semperatis!

Page 44 of my Tactics manual (1987 edition), under "The Ships of the Federation Star Fleet," the paragraph describing the Heavy Cruiser says (not quoting here) the ship is designed to absorb the enemy's damage then fire a devastating blow with its photons and phasers. It goes on to say that the photon can miss at even modest ranges, but the ship was built to handle anything a D7 can give and still return fire.
Let's get DANGEROUS!

Tice Leonard, U.S.S. Lexington & IKV Annihilation
Post Reply