Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:55 pm
But part of the point is that not all FC players might want the BoM rules. Which is just as well they will be optional.
There's not a lot any player can do to force anything. If SVC and SPP refuse a change to SFB, it's not going to happen. However, if the door is open for a certain topic to be considered, why not look to some of the things FC does well for consideration?
It's not like I'm looking at, say, Klingon Armada for inspiration here. (Not to belittle that game, just to say that its mechanics are incompatible with the SFB/FC dynamic.)
Personally, one other change I'd like to see in SFB (after the superstack abolition) would be the addition of FC's double reverse movement. Unless you fly a Sigvirion-like flying saucer, by and large your ship and its engines are oriented to the front, not the front and the back.
But then, that's probably an argument for another day...
There's not a lot any player can do to force anything. If SVC and SPP refuse a change to SFB, it's not going to happen. However, if the door is open for a certain topic to be considered, why not look to some of the things FC does well for consideration?
It's not like I'm looking at, say, Klingon Armada for inspiration here. (Not to belittle that game, just to say that its mechanics are incompatible with the SFB/FC dynamic.)
Personally, one other change I'd like to see in SFB (after the superstack abolition) would be the addition of FC's double reverse movement. Unless you fly a Sigvirion-like flying saucer, by and large your ship and its engines are oriented to the front, not the front and the back.
But then, that's probably an argument for another day...