Page 1 of 2
TK7
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:57 pm
by wedge_hammersteel
I am doing my own version of a TK7. Based a little off of the TK5.
Which looks better? The right or the left. I left the neck attachment on the one on the right.
http://members.cox.net/ashman/PA050084.JPG
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:13 pm
by djdood
From both an aesthetic and structural standpoint, I prefer the one on the left.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:31 pm
by wedge_hammersteel
I like the one on the left too. I only have one pair of engines right now. If I can find another pair, I might complete and paint both and post more pictures.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:59 pm
by Scoutdad
Burt. I would definitely go with the one on the left.
I'm certainly not an expert on Klingon affairs, but I would think that if a D7 boom were to seperate from the hull, then the entire boom... including the neck piece left on the right-hand photo would seperate.
Not only that, the left-hand version will be much more stable on the playing surface.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:29 pm
by OGOPTIMUS
I'll say left too. The right one just seems to stick out too far. Plus, that neck just seems like a structural weak point, both on the table and in universe.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:23 pm
by wedge_hammersteel
OGOPTIMUS, actually, both tholian modules are pretty secure after supergluing.
Based on what scoutdad, et al, mentioned, I will go with the one on the left. I wasnt sure what parts of the Klingon ship are considered "boom material" on seperation.
I will post a pic in a day or two.
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:45 pm
by The Master
The left , more sound!
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:37 pm
by wedge_hammersteel
Another issue
When the Tholians created the TK5, did they leave the Klingon back half with klingon paint or did they repaint it to match their other ships?
I planned to paint my mini with Klingon colors for the back half and tholian colors for the front half.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:48 pm
by djdood
I don't recall reading anything about it one way or the other. It could look cool either way.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:01 pm
by Scoutdad
Hmmm... good question.
Since Tholians use infra-red visible paint for their symbols / hull numbers, would you even be able to tell (in the visible spectrum,that is) if they had painted the ship?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:30 pm
by SWO_Daddy
This was my take on the TK5. I assumed a constant hull color, and used the same yellow I use on Tholian engines for the F-5 engine "vents". I kitbashed this thing way back in 2001 or so, but it still stands up OK.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:41 pm
by Steve Cole
Somebody do one I can cast!
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:16 pm
by Scoutdad
Steve Cole wrote:Somebody do one I can cast!
Steve, if no one else has spoke up already... I have both an F5 and a Tholian PC sitting in my "to be painting" area.
I can hack them up and get you a TK5 by the end of this week.
Re: TK7
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:47 pm
by Starsuperion
wedge_hammersteel wrote:I am doing my own version of a TK7. Based a little off of the TK5.
Which looks better? The right or the left. I left the neck attachment on the one on the right.
http://members.cox.net/ashman/PA050084.JPG
wedge, do you mind if I try a paintshop pro rendition of that mini? I want to try something out..
I like the left but it is missing something, the right is okay but is too long..
can I manipulate the image just a bit and repost a link to it here??
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:34 pm
by wedge_hammersteel
Sure, go ahead.
I did mine from a Klingon D-7 body and a Neo-tholian front. It was easier to stick a neo-tholian front on the Klingon body than cutting a tholian PC to fit. Plus, The Neo-tholian front was too large to connect to a F5 body so I chose a D7.
scoutdad, I would like to see that mini. SWO's looks good but it appears to be 75% tholian and 25% klingon while the SSD looks to be closer to 50/50.
