Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Archive through March 23, 2009	25		03/23 09:54pm
	Archive through September 07, 2009	25		09/07 09:27pm
	Archive through December 24, 2009	25		12/24 05:13pm
	Archive through January 31, 2010	25		01/31 07:59pm
	Archive through February 21, 2014	25		02/21 02:02pm

Thanks Steven missed it when I was searching through the SSDs.

By Garth L. Getgen (Sgt_G) on Saturday, February 22, 2014 - 04:35 pm: Edit

Annex #3, Master Ship Chart, Federation, POL: Crew Units should read as 10 instead of 6. (Garth L. Getgen, 22 FEB 2014)

Annex #3, Master Ship Chart, Federation, POL: Request a line for the POL+ upgrade. Rational: All other Federation ships list their Plus Refits with new BPV & YIS, so why doesn't the POL? (Garth L. Getgen, 22 FEB 2014)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, March 06, 2014 - 09:59 pm: Edit

Annex #3:

(R11.10) Andromedan Bull Snake: This ship needs a note that it can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434). (Nick Samaras March 6, 2013).
(R11.20) Andromedan Rattler: This ship needs a note that it can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434). (Nick Samaras March 6, 2013).
(R11.21) Andromedan Diamond Back: This ship needs a note that it can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434). (Nick Samaras March 6, 2013).
(R11.22) Andromedan King Snake: This ship needs a note that it can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434). (Nick Samaras March 6, 2013).

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Friday, March 07, 2014 - 11:45 am: Edit

Nick Samaras:

Minor point, but (R11.0) is the Lyran Star Empire series of numbers.

The Andromedan Invaders are (R10.0).

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Friday, March 07, 2014 - 02:57 pm: Edit

MSC lists that most Romulan Eagle-type ships can land by the aerodynamic and powered landing systems, and have the landing bonus. Romulan SSDs and ship descriptions (that have the landing note) only list the aerodynamic method. Is the MSC correct or in error? (Nick Samaras March 7, 2014)

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 05, 2014 - 11:35 am: Edit

Romulan: FarHawk Cruiser-Carriers and Variants: FHU: YIS: Y177 should be Y179. Y179 is the Hvy Fighter Introduction Date in G3 and (530.0). Thomas Mathews 5 Apr 2014

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 05, 2014 - 12:25 pm: Edit

Klingon: D5W New Heavy Cruisers and Variants: DWB: YIS: Y176‡ should be Y178‡. Heavy fighters are not introduced into squadron service until Y178 according to G3 and (530.0). Thomas Mathews 5 Apr 2014

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 05, 2014 - 04:12 pm: Edit

SPP, will G4 have empires added since the publication of G3?

By Joe Carlson (Jrc) on Monday, April 07, 2014 - 11:53 pm: Edit

SPP,

Any idea if G4 will be publish in 2014?

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, May 26, 2014 - 06:39 pm: Edit

Any information on the a G4?

By Patrick H. Dillman (Patrick) on Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - 01:03 pm: Edit

Will the Juggernaught Empire ships be included in G4?

By Steven E. Ehrbar (See) on Thursday, September 24, 2015 - 10:16 pm: Edit

Annex #4, Master Fighter Chart, Gorn, G-12D: DFR should be 2*, not 3*. Module J2 in rule (R6.F8) establishes the D-refits of both the G-12 and G-18 have reduced DFRs, which is why the Gorn also made the contemporaneous K-refits, which do not suffer this reduction. (Steven E. Ehrbar, 24 SEPT 2015)

EDIT: (Or, um, maybe not, since the revised R4 SSDs showing G-12Ds went through and used the DFR 3 anyway, and so it would be a lot of bother to fix. In which case, though, the existence of the G-12K with the same Y183 YIS seems really illogical, since you could put Ks on D-rails anyway. Maybe move the G-12D to a later service date but with the full 3 DFR?)

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Saturday, December 31, 2016 - 11:54 am: Edit

With the SFBOL Conversion effectively completed, how long before we can get print and electronic versions of Master Annexes G4 and G4A on the production schedule?

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Monday, January 02, 2017 - 02:20 pm: Edit

G4/G4A? I asked over the holidays so it likely got missed, my bad so I will ask again.

With the SFBOL Conversion effectively completed, how long before we can get print and electronic versions of Master Annexes G4 and G4A on the production schedule?

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, January 02, 2017 - 05:38 pm: Edit

Shawn Hantke:

I do not have an answer to that at this time.

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Tuesday, January 03, 2017 - 11:43 am: Edit

In the mean time electronic G3 and G3A would be a nice alternative to G4 and G4A in the short term, although G3 and G3A are almost eight years old now.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Friday, February 24, 2017 - 04:48 pm: Edit

Sequence of Play.
6B8: SHUTTLE & PF FUNCTIONS STAGE
5th paragraph "and PFs (K2.322)" should not be bolded as PFs are not used in tournaments. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Friday, February 24, 2017 - 09:02 pm: Edit

Fed MSC
New Survey Carrier (NRV): Should have 42 crew, not 41. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Police Destroyer (PDD): Turn mode should be B, not A. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Battle Tug (BT): Docking should be 11, the sum total of all parts, not 7+4. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Battle Tug+ (BT+): Docking should be 11, the sum total of all parts, not 7+4. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Battle Tug Light (BTL): Docking should be 11, the sum total of all parts, not 7+4. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Battle Tug Light+ (BTL+): Docking should be 11, the sum total of all parts, not 7+4. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

Carrier Tug (CVT): Docking should be 11, the sum total of all parts, not 7+4. (Nick Samaras, February 24, 2017)

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, March 01, 2017 - 02:04 pm: Edit

Kzinti: War Destroyers and Variants: DWP: YIS 178 should be Y181. Kzinti PFs are listed in G3 with a YIS of Y181. The Kzinti PFT based on the DD hull is listed with a YIS of Y181. Thomas Mathews 1 Mar 2017

By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar2) on Wednesday, March 01, 2017 - 07:59 pm: Edit

Turtle, the DWP may have been built with interceptors (Y179) in mind (as the Kzinti ramped up to PFs)...

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Monday, March 13, 2017 - 07:13 pm: Edit

Annex #1:

Add: Neutron Star P15.5 (Nick Samaras, March 13, 2017)
Add: White Dwarf P10.5 (Nick Samaras, March 13, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, March 19, 2017 - 07:20 am: Edit

Rom FALX (R4.217): Rule number should be 217, not 210. Explosion strength 23 not 21. (Nick Samaras, March 19, 2017)

ROM SABX (R4.2212): Explosion strength should be 21, not 27.(Nick Samaras, March 19, 2017)

By Alex Chobot (Alendrel) on Monday, February 22, 2021 - 10:56 am: Edit

MSC:

Andromedan MOS: Listed explosion strength of 30 and Command Rating of 20 are both way above other sleds (7 and 3 for most, with the GUN having an explosion strength of 10) with the CR being twice what is a hard cap in the game systems.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, February 22, 2021 - 01:45 pm: Edit

From the Module R8 after action:

(R10.62) MOS: The ship’s explosion strength is 7, it has a command rating of 3. The MWPs are carried on external links as is noted on the SSD and dock and undock by the same procedures as PFs (K2.3). The MOS cannot launch or recover an MWP by transporter, as it is Satellite Ship (G19.414), even though nominally operating satellites of its own.

By Will McCammon (Djdood) on Thursday, May 20, 2021 - 09:00 pm: Edit

Annex #3, Master Ship Chart, Juggernaut: Product Where Published should read CL1/CL33. (Will McCammon, 20 MAY 2021)

(currently reads as CL1/CL35)
(CL1 has Juggernaut [Alpha] as an old non-Captain's SSD)
(CL33 has Juggernaut Beta)
(CL35 has the Juggernaut empire CA and CL)

By Bill Phillips (Praetor) on Sunday, January 19, 2025 - 02:16 pm: Edit

Has there been any progress on releasing G4 and G4A ?

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Sunday, January 19, 2025 - 06:35 pm: Edit

It isn't a priority. The priority is updating older modules like R6 and K so that we can upload them to the PDF stores.