By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 01:37 pm: Edit |
No.
X2 is the next revolution after. X1R was coined as a reference to fleetwise X-tech.
X2-proper would be the first new X2-ships and X2R fleetwide production X2.
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 02:02 pm: Edit |
John T.
Right! Exactly.
By michael john campbell (Michaelcampbell) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 10:20 pm: Edit |
Quote:Mostly, I don't see a need for a X2P. X1 ships with partial X2 tech. I'm all for XP (GW ships with partial X1 tech.) XP has been on the wish list of many for a long time. We all have favorite ships from the GW but I haven't talked to anyone who has been wishing they could make the D5X more powerful with a couple somethings.
Quote:Though I would think the mentalities of the Empires Admirals would produce a full cruiser first. Cruisers have always been the show piece of new technologies
By David Lang (Dlang) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 10:39 pm: Edit |
MJC, we have been talking about XP not including replacement engines so it wouldn't improve the strategic speed of the ships, just the combat power.
you would want X2P ships for the same reason you have the X1P ships, you increase the capibility of an existing design for less cost then building a new class.
anything that limits the races to fewer then about one heavy command ship per theater will have very little chance of working.
This means the
Lyrans will have 2
Hydrans/Kzinti/Romulans 1-2 (they want 2, but may only be able to afford 1 and they have a continuous border to patrol)
Klingons/Federation 2-3 (probably 3)
Gorn 1
Tholian 1
ISC ???
as the minimum numbers.
to this we would probably want to add 1-2 to this to allow for a new one to be in workups and an old one to be on the way out to come up with the treaty limits
remember that the washington naval treaty allowed the major nations something like 5 BBs each and the smaller ones 2-3.
this allows a large command ship to show up on any front, but seldom more then one becouse you wouldn't want to strip another border of it's one.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 10:48 pm: Edit |
Actually, engine-relacement is a suspended hot debate (pardon the pun). A lot of people want Hotwarp/Fast warp on XP ships.
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 10:50 pm: Edit |
XP Standard strategic speed Hot Warp engines (not fast warp)
X1 Inefficient expensive after-burner engines to improve speed. Costs justified due to war.
XR New hulls and improved warp flow dynamics allows ships to be as fast as X1 but much more efficient. Costs justified due to peace.
X2 All that XR jazz plus inefficient, expensive after-burner engines. Costs justified due to war.
XRP could potentially put after-burner engines on XR ships to allow them greater strategic speed but they would have a very limited cruising range, limited self repair, no ability to self resupply, etc. These ships could be as fast as X2 but if running at full burn would only have a few months worth of fuel.
By David Lang (Dlang) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 11:00 pm: Edit |
I think XR and X1 should have the same game effects, the engines for XR may be more efficiant (defiantly less troublesom so they don't need outstanding crews to maintain them), but the difference will be just in maintinance and construction costs.
we don't yet have any maintinance in the SFB universe (not in SFB or F&E, I actually expect it to show up first in GPD becouse players will need to know how much their ships are to maintain)
the construction savings will be reflected in the fact that you don't have to spend XPoints to pay for the ships, but can use EPoints instead, this doesn't directly make the ships much cheaper, but allows you to produce more of them
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 - 12:06 am: Edit |
David,
makes sense.
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 - 10:51 pm: Edit |
Or a mix of EP and XP to pay for the upgrade, as a compromise.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 - 11:03 pm: Edit |
EP and a touch of XP.
By Christopher E. Fant (Cfant) on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 - 11:23 pm: Edit |
X tech costs XTPs, period. You can't get advanced tech with normal EPs, just doesn't work.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 12:01 am: Edit |
Yes, but we're not expending near the XP for a full-X conversion.
Also, as X becomes the standard tech, EPs and XPs will have to become interchangeable.
Going from EY to MY, the equivalent of XPs probably had to be expended to build the first MY ships as well, but it became standard tech and from there on, EPs were all that was needed.
the same shift has to happen to X-tech
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 12:36 am: Edit |
Some of the XP refit might not actually be X-Tech. THe shield improvements don't have to be. The Warp refit (if used) could be a modified version ofthe old "Fast Warp" thus not X-Tech.
So I'd say that it could be a 50/50 cost(EP/XP). And THATS the reason the Empires went for it full barral.
By David Lang (Dlang) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 01:05 am: Edit |
go ahead and pay XP for the upgrade, but the base ship is EP
this gets close to the 50-50 mix (probably 2-1 EP-XP depending on how many upgrades they get)
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 04:10 pm: Edit |
What is XR?
XR1: The Trade Wars
XR1: After X1
XR1: After the Andros
XR1: Before the Xorks
XR1: Y205-214 (proposed)
XR1: Smaller balanced ships
XR1: Cheaper to operate, maintain, repair and crew
XR2: After the Xorks
XR2: Same tech as XR1
XR2: Larger war ships
XR2: Y215-225 (proposed)
X2: Xorks pushed back out of Alpha space
X2: Strategically faster war ships matching Xork tech level
X2: Self-sufficient with extended range
X2: Y226-234 (proposed)
If this progression is adopted then the changes for X2 are significant from a strategic point of view and may contain some of the extended range functionality found in Supplement #2.
So where does XR fit in? Our options are:
1) A fleet wide standardization of X1 tech built on new more efficient to operate hulls
2) An intermediate technology using some new systems and some X1 systems
3) Completely new X2 tech standard without the strategic advantages
Option 1, Standard X1 tech pushed on new hulls doesn't add much to the game IMHO.
Option 3, Completely new X2 tech will be difficult to balance against X1/XP/X0 ships.
Option 2, Seems to offer the smoothest technology transition and should reduce generational RPS.
XR can be an intermediate tech level between X1 and X2 using some of each. Ships with a YIS date of Y205 (XR1) would use 75% X1 tech, ships with a YIS date of 215 (XR2) would use 75% X2 tech. XR1 would have upgrades to get to XR2. Neither XR1 nor XR2 could be upgraded to include the strategic advantages of X2.
From a module perspective we have X1, XP, XR1, XR2, CX (Xorks), X2. X1 is already published so that's five new modules to cover Y190-250.
Specifically to define XR, which of the three options do others feel is best?
By David Lang (Dlang) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 04:26 pm: Edit |
XR1 should be the time after the general war, the ISC, and the andros when X technology becomes more common and at the end of the XR1 time period there should be no X0 ships left in the fleets and very few if any XP ships left in the fleet. X1 becomes the norm
XR2 should be the same thing after X2 initially comes out. first X2 ships are rare and valuble, then X2P adds upgrades to X1 ships, then XR2 replaces all the X1 and X2P ships with X2 ships.
the intermediate stpe between X1 and X2 should be the X2P ships just like the intermediate step between X0 and X1 is the XP ships
By David Lang (Dlang) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 04:44 pm: Edit |
frankly I think the most interesting periods to play are going to be the XP and X2P periods, the X1 and XR ships are so optimized and cookiecutter that they do loose something (I haven't played them with the proposed X changes yet so hopefully they will fix things a LOT), XP has the potential to increase capabilities without making all the ships able to do everything they want to do at the same time, X2 will add a lot of capabilities, but I expect them to have some of the same type of problems that the origional X1 ships had so X2R will also be very interesting.
By John Trauger (Vorlonagent) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 08:08 pm: Edit |
X1R is loosely defined as the time when X-tech is standard fleet technology.
We have 2 or 3 periods for X1, of which X1R is one.
X-tech appears at the end of the GW era as leading-bleeding-edge technology. CX's for the flagships of fleets When fighting the Andros, while debates at home rage on whether X-ships are better as elements of mixes X/non-X fleets or if the empires should form all-X squadrons and eventually, fleets. All-X fleets eventually win.
XP should take place after the Anros have been defeated. The groundwork for the XP refit would be laid during the Andro War, but supplies and logistics prevent XP refitted ships from participating. XP and most true-X ships stay home to watch for Andro counterstrikes.
After the Andro War is over, the genie is out of the bottle. The powers all settle back into their prewar habit of eyeing each over suspiciously over the border. But everyone's economy is way too shot to afford many incidents. XP conversions continue as a way of stretching each empire's X-point budget. Assuming that star Fleet Overlord = Trade Wars, Excess GW-tech hulls are sold to ambitious companies wanting to develop the Andro's old stomping grounds. (Despite security procedures, a few private ships receive the XP refit and a Federation company manages to commision ond field
one full-blown CX, the USS Nadisco )
X1R starts when the empire's economies start getting money from the GMC settlements and all X-fleets become viable. Ship designs begin to evolve as empires start to rouse from economic torpor. the rate of change is nothing like the frenetic pace of the General War, but eventually a new generation of X-ships emerges which would be the equivalent of BCs, DNs, etc.
Then, it's Xorktime and all hades busts loose.
By David Lang (Dlang) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 08:51 pm: Edit |
and when the Xorks arrive the cycle of technology begins again, just replace non-X with X1 and X with X2 in the above technology line
By Jeff Tonglet (Blackbeard) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 10:07 pm: Edit |
If the small X1 varients are getting built, why wouldn't some of the CX ships also be varients at the same time?
Is this the latest proposed timeline?
X1 Module
Y181-Y195
First use of X tech
Limited production, and baseline ships only.
Outstanding crews are needed.
GW ships are common, X1 ships are limited.
X1R - Varients for X1 ships
Y195-Y202
Outstanding crew restriction is lifted.
All new construction is X1 tech.
XP - Partial X - X-tech Refits of GW ships
Y195-Y202
Refits for GW ships using X1 tech.
X2 - Second Generation Advanced Technology
Y205-Y225
Trade Wars
Mix of various tech levels in use.
X0 ships are being sold to whoever has money.
All DD and FF new construction is X2 tech.
DDX and FFX ships in general use.
X2 CA and CL are unique or limited, as they are seen as not worth the cost.
X1 CA is the general purpose flagship.
X2R - Varients for X2 ships
Y225 +
Xork Invasion
Most/all X0/XP ships are destroyed in the first few years.
A large portion of X1 ships are also lost.
All new construction is X2 tech
X2 CA,CL,DD,FF Varients
Xork ships with X2 technology comprise the invading force.
Xorks conquer large parts of the galaxy, the tide doesn't turn until X2 production is able to provide sufficient numbers of ships to mount effective battle fleets.
By Tos Crawford (Tos) on Thursday, January 16, 2003 - 11:23 pm: Edit |
Close. There have been timeline snippets posted but the last full timeline, similar to what you posted, was put up 1/13/03 1:56pm.
What you are calling X1R, variants for X1 ships like the GSCX, is usually called X1B.
“All new construction is X1 tech.”
No decision to make ‘all new construction X1 tech’ has been made, but it has been proposed.
“If the small X1 varients are getting built, why wouldn't some of the CX ships also be varients at the same time?”
It runs into the problem of ‘do you really want to spend that much on a minesweeper/commando/fast resupply ship?’ Forcing a historical player to build X-tech when he doesn’t want to is something I’d rather avoid.
“X1R is loosely defined as the time when X-tech is standard fleet technology.”
X1R, shortened to XR in the 1/13 timeline, begins in Y205. X2 is a better name so whatever its called is a question of semantics. Doesn’t matter as long as we all know what year is being discussed. Y205 will see general availability for X tech. There is the all-new hulls concept, which comes from the (X0.0) flavor text. Presumably X0/X1/X1B/XP ships could not be converted to Y205+ ships because of these basic hull advancements.
“Assuming that star Fleet Overlord = Trade Wars, Excess GW-tech hulls are sold to ambitious companies wanting to develop the Andro's old stomping grounds.”
“X0 ships are being sold to whoever has money.”
I don’t subscribe to that theory. The LMC is populated, and not just by Andros. Exploiting it isn’t economical.
Where your timeline and mine differ is how we beat back the Xorks. I have the Xorks invading with superior technology. We fight defensively but continue to loose ground until we can match their tech by what your timeline would refer to as X3.
Overall, excepting the semantics, the basics are converging.
By Jeff Tonglet (Blackbeard) on Friday, January 17, 2003 - 01:12 am: Edit |
Quote:X1R, shortened to XR in the 1/13 timeline, begins in Y205. X2 is a better name so whatever its called is a question of semantics. Doesn’t matter as long as we all know what year is being discussed.
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Friday, January 17, 2003 - 01:26 am: Edit |
Jeff. Well done, I like it but I do take exception to the "No XP refit to BCH hulls. BCH hulls in general are new hull designs and are not compact War Cruiser design style either. I think there is room for the upgrade. And tell me, who doesn't want to see their favorite BCH finally get to be all it can be? I would love to see a C7 or a BCG get X-Batts etc. and have a go at each other or against a X-Orion or a Andromedan.
By David Lang (Dlang) on Friday, January 17, 2003 - 01:31 am: Edit |
in the no CW/DW/etc area I think there is room for discussion and racial flavor (i.e. not all of the CWs are real 'war' classes, some fit that niche, but were full capibility designs to start with)
as for HDW/BCH/NCA, as I have said before these shouldn't get XP refits, but there should be X1 versions of them
By Loren Knight (Loren) on Friday, January 17, 2003 - 01:39 am: Edit |
Well, if X1R has the BCHX then I'll let go of the BCHXP but I'd rather see the latter.
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |