Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Archive through September 10, 2014	25		09/10 05:37pm
	Archive through March 24, 2015	25		03/24 02:51pm
	Archive through June 26, 2017	25		06/26 02:01am
	Archive through February 20, 2022	25		03/26 10:14pm

Concur with Stewart, and Jeff, on the A-20, note how the parts we can see match the Type-III multi-warhead drones on the F-14.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, March 23, 2022 - 04:26 pm: Edit

(R2.FA8) Federation B-47 - In the sentence "Two Rigellian National Guard squadrons that saw combat service were quickly annihilated, and the type was completely phased out by the end of the year.", should "and the type was" be "and the bomber was"? Also, what year were these bombers phased out? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Mar 2022

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, March 24, 2022 - 12:35 pm: Edit

(R2.F15) Federation B-52E - In the B-52E section "but added two chaff packs" should be either "but added one chaff pack" or "but added an additional chaff pack" as adding two chaff packs would be a total of 3. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 10:52 am: Edit

(R2.F1) Federation F-14C - Should not the sentance "For the F-14D each pair of special rails (type-III drones) can be marked as carrying a single type-IV drone." be in the paragraph for the F-14D and not the F-14C? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Mar 2022.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 10:14 pm: Edit

Careful, Ken, you may be offered a job in Amarillo.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 27, 2022 - 02:20 pm: Edit

(R2.F10) Federation F-15C - Should F-15D in "For the F-15D two pairs of standard rails (type-I drones) can be marked as carrying a single type-IV drone." be F-15C? If not this sentance should be removed for the F-15C entry. It is stated in the F-15D entry. - Ken Kazinski, 27 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, April 13, 2022 - 08:01 pm: Edit

(R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - There is no mention of a mega-fighter pack for this bomber in the unit description. G3 has mega-fighter pack bombers listed. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 07:56 pm: Edit

(R2,FA14) Federation F-101 - Should not "(J11.11)" be "(J11.111)" as these pods against speed and DFR? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 10:51 pm: Edit

(R2.F4) MSSB-R2 - Federation F-16E - Annex #4 correctly shows that this unit would have had 2xVI drones. Per (R1.F7) Type-VI drones are retained. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - From J2 Errata "(R2.F16) The FB-111 is a two-space fighter that uses the bomber damage system and can only operate from ground bases", and CL25 "(R2.F16) The FB-111 is a two-space fighter that uses the bomber damage system and can only operate from ground bases, but just to be completely confusing it uses the F-111 weapons launch rate." MSSB-R2 does not have any mention of this. Is this unit a fighter or should it be a heavy figher? Also, does this mean that this figher uses (J14.3) for damage? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - As this unit is a fighter should not bomber be figher in "These mines must be purchased as part of the force; the bomber does not come with transporter bombs of its own."? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - As this unit is a fighter should not bomber be figher in "if the bomber is crippled (a mine could still be dropped). Items in the bay cannot be used if the bomber is used as a scatter-pack (FD7.44)." - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

By Eric Snyder (Esnyder) on Friday, January 12, 2024 - 09:52 pm: Edit

(R2.18) Federation NCL - "The result was the 'new' light cruiser, which entered production in Y170" The F&E SIT lists the year available as Y169, and the Order of Battle shows production in Y169S. - Eric Snyder, 1 Jan 2024.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Saturday, January 13, 2024 - 02:19 am: Edit

Series production for the MSSB.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, November 10, 2025 - 11:25 pm: Edit

(YR2.34) MSSB-R02 Federation YBB - Should not "the B10 (R3.17)" be "Battleship (R3.17)" or "B10 Battleship (R3.17)"? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.34) MSSB-R02 Federation YBB - Should not "any other ship (YR3.8)" be "any other ship, the early battleship (YR3.8)"? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.34) MSSB-R02 Federation YBB - Should not there be a note when early years restrications end or are not lifted for this unit? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.18) MSSB-R02 Federation YCC - In the "Names" paragarph, should not "Other" be "At least two others were built." per CL52. - Ken Kazinski, 03 November 2025.

(YR2.18) MSSB-R02 Federation YCC - The designation 'Peter the Great' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL52. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.18) MSSB-R02 Federation YCC - The sentance 'None of these ships were upgraded and all were discarded by Y143. Their NCC numbers are unknown.', was found in CL52 but not in MSSB-R02. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.18) MSSB-R02 Federation YCC - Should not "Federation had were in the form" be "Federation had been in the form" - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.18) MSSB-R02 Federation YCC - There is no note stating which systems are upgraded from early years restrictions (e.g. Labs, Photons, etc.). - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.4) MSSB-R02 Federation YCA - Should not "cruiser (YR2.18), National Guard cruiser (R2.116)" be "National guard heavy cruiser (R2.116)"? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.4) MSSB-R02 Federation YCA - Should not "heavy cruiser standard (R2.4)" be "Heavy cruiser (R2.4)"? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.4) MSSB-R02 Federation YCA - There is no note stating which systems are upgraded from early years restrictions (e.g. Labs, Photons, etc.). - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.5) MSSB-R02 Federation YCL - Should not "(or old light cruiser) (R2.5)" be "(Old) light cruiser (R2.5)"? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Nov 2025.

(YR2.5) MSSB-R02 Federation YCL - Should not "(YR2.22), and early hospital ship (YR2.37)" be "Early years hospital ship (YR2.37)"? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 15, 2025 - 01:10 pm: Edit

(YR2.20) MSSB-R02 Federation YCM - Per "The original warp-refitted commando cruisers (YR2.19) were converted to this design beginning in Y84 (one each year)" should the YIS be Y84 in this sentance as the SSD lists Y85 possibly update the sentence to "converted to this design beginning in Y85 (one each year)". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) MSSB-R02 Federation YCM - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) MSSB-R02 Federation YCM - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) MSSB-R02 Federation YCM - Per the note on the SSD (Y2, pg 8) should not "The ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434) (other early light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." be "The ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434) (other early light cruisers cannot), it cannot take off during the scenario in which it landed and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.37) MSSB-R02 Federation YCH - Should not there be a comma after "engines" and "available" in "the improved warp engines then available she would". Updated to "the improved warp engines, then available, she would". - Ken Kazinski, 14 Nov 2025.

(YR2.37) MSSB-R02 Federation YCH - Should not "Thus apprised of the findings" be "Thus, apprised of the findings" - Ken Kazinski, 14 Nov 2025.

(YR2.37) MSSB-R02 Federation YCH - Should not "warp-refitted hospital ships (R2.36)." be "warp-refitted hospital ships (YR2.36)."? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Nov 2025.

(YR2.37) MSSB-R02 Federation YCH - (R2.36) is the rule for the New drone cruiser. Should not "warp-refitted hospital ships (R2.36)" be "warp-refitted hospital ships (YR2.36)" ? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 08:48 pm: Edit

(YR2.7) MSSB-R02 Federation YDD - Should not "and the National Guard escort (R2.120)" be "National guard destroyer escort (R2.120)"? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.7) MSSB-R02 Federation YDD - The statement "some ships were relegated to the National Guard (R2.117) and had their transporters extended to Range 5 at no cost in Y140." Does this mean the YDD did get range 5 transporters? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.7) MSSB-R02 Federation YDD - Should there be a paragraph stating if other systems keep the early years restrictions (photons, labs, etc.)? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.7) MSSB-R02 Federation YDD - The known names should contain Red Cloud from SL216.0 (CL25). - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.7) MSSB-R02 Federation YDD - The known names should contain Charles XII from SL233.0 (CL30). - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.


(YR2.8) MSSB-R02 Federation YFF - The statement "some ships were relegated to the National Guard (R2.118) and had their transporters extended to Range 5 at no cost in Y140." Does this mean the YDD did get range 5 transporters? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.8) MSSB-R02 Federation YFF - Should there be a paragraph stating if other systems keep the early years restrictions (photons, labs, etc.)? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.8) MSSB-R02 Federation YFF - Should not the "Designed by" paragraph come after the "Transporter:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.8) MSSB-R02 Federation YFF - Should not "include the early transport frigate (YR2.35)" be "Early years transport frigate (YR2.35)"? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.


(YR2.35) MSSB-R02 Federation YFT - There should be a period after the sentance "The Early Years transport frigate is a variant of the early frigate (YR2.8)" - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.35) MSSB-R02 Federation YFT - By convention the rule should be included for the passenger types in "cargo (R2.11) and passenger (R2.9) types." - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.35) MSSB-R02 Federation YFT - Should not "for an early armed priority transport (YR1.13)" be "Early years armed priority transport (YR1.13)"? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.35) MSSB-R02 Federation YFT - Should not "never enough fleet tugs (YR2.9)" be "Early fleet tug (YR2.9)"? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(YR2.9) MSSB-R02 Federation YTG - Should not "period were cargo (R2.11)" be "Cargo pod (R2.11)"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.9) MSSB-R02 Federation YTG - By convention the rule should be included for the passenger types in "cargo (R2.11) and passenger (R2.9) types." - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2025.

(R2.11) MSSB-R02 Federation P-CP - Should not "a VIP transport; see (R2.151)" be "; see Priority battle transport (R2.151)"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(R2.11) MSSB-R02 Federation P-CP - Should not "damage points. See (R2.47)" be "See Priority transport (R2.47)"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(R2.11) MSSB-R02 Federation P-CP - Should not "to a tug (R2.8)" be "Fleet tug (R2.8)"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 22, 2025 - 07:46 am: Edit

(YR2.2) MSSB-R02 Federation WCL - Should not ""the old light cruiser" (R2.5)" be "(Old) light cruiser (R2.5)"? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) MSSB-R02 Federation WCM - Should not "(D15.84), three heavy-weapons squads (D15.81)" be "heavy weapons squad (D15.81)?" - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.
(YR2.19) MSSB-R02 Federation WCM - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) MSSB-R02 Federation WCM - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squads (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.21) MSSB-R2 Federation WSR - There should be a period at the end of "(using their special sensors to watch for intrusions into the expanding sphere of Federation space)" - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.21) MSSB-R2 Federation WSR - The unit rule states "converted to the early survey cruiser (YR2.22) standard beginning in Y82." The YIS for the YCS is Y85. Should the YCS YIS be updated to Y82 or should MSSB-R2 be updated to Y85? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 26, 2025 - 07:46 am: Edit

(YR2.36) MSSB-R02 Federation WCH - Should not "[a Rigelian warp-refitted destroyer (YR2.10)" be "Rigelian early destroyer (YR2.10)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.3) MSSB-R02 Federation WDD - Should not "Variants include warp-refitted destroyer leader (YR2.45)" be "Terrain warp-refitted destroyer leader (YR2.45)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.38) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WACC - Should not "than the heavy cruiser (YR2.15)" be "Alpha-Centauran early cruiser (YR2.15)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.15) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) YAC - Should not "to Star Fleet cruisers (YR2.4)" be "to Star Fleet Early heavy cruiser (YR2.4)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.26) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WAL - Should not "somewhat larger heavy cruiser (YR2.15)" be "somewhat larger heavy cruiser, Alpha-Centauran early cruiser (YR2.15)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.39) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WALG - Should not "four commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.39) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WALG - Should not "the Alpha-Centauran light cruiser (YR2.26)" be "Alpha-Centauran Warp-refitted light cruiser (YR2.26)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.14) MSSB-R02 Federation YAC - The known names should list Herathia from SL188 (CL21). - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.14) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) YAD - Should not "converted their existing destroyers (YR2.14)" be "existing Alpha-Centauran early destroyers (YR2.14)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.14) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) YAD - Should not "destroyers (YR2.14) and cruisers (YR2.15)" be "Alpha-Centauran early cruisers (YR2.15)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.27) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WAF - There should be a period at the end of "Brutal, Savage, Vicious, others" - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.27) MSSB-R02 Federation (Alpha-Centauran) WAF - Should not "than the Terran ship (YR2.25)" be "Terran Warp-Refitted frigate (YR2.25)"? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Nov 2025.

(YR2.28) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) WAC - Should not "of the Andorian early cruiser (YR2.17)" be "Andorian early heavy cruiser (YR2.17)"? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.17) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) YNC - Should not "ship than the destroyer (YR2.16)" be "Andorian early destroyer (YR2.16)"? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.40) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) WNL - Should not "the warp refitted heavy cruiser (YR2.17)" be "Andorian early heavy cruiser (YR2.17)"? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.41) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) WNLG - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.29) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) WNF - Should not "ships, anything from a cruiser (YR2.17)" be "Andorian early heavy cruiser (YR2.17)"? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.29) MSSB-R02 Federation (Andorian) WNF - Should not "the Terran warp-refitted frigate (YR2.25)" be "Terran Warp-Refitted frigate (YR2.25)"? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.42) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) WRCC - Should not "of the warp-refitted heavy cruiser (YR2.11)" be "Rigelian early heavy cruiser (YR2.11)"? - Ken Kazinski, 24 Nov 2025.

(YR2.11) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) YRC - Should not "than the early destroyer (YR2.10)" be "Rigelian early destroyer (YR2.10)"? - Ken Kazinski, 24 Nov 2025.

(YR2.30) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) WRL - Should not "Variants include warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR2.43)" be "Rigelian warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR2.43)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.43) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) WRLG - Should not "same time as the Master (YR2.42)" be "same time as the Rigelian warp-refitted command cruiser Master (YR2.42)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.43) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) WRLG - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.31) MSSB-R02 Federation (Rigelian) WRF - Should not "than the warp-refitted destroyer (YR2.10)" be "Rigelian early destroyer (YR2.10)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.23) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WDN - Should not "warp-refitted light cruisers (YR2.2)" be "Warp-Refitted cruiser (YR2.2)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.44) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WCC - Should not "their sublight heavy cruisers (YR2.24)" be "Warp-Refitted heavy cruiser (YR2.24)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.44) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WCC - Should not "early heavy cruiser (YR2.3)" be "Warp-Reffitted destoyer (YR2.3)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.45) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WDL - Should not "existing warp-refitted destroyers (YR2.3)" be "Warp-Refitted destoyer (YR2.3)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.46) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFL - Should not "crash landing bonus in (P2.4311)" be "crash landing bonus (P2.4311)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.46) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFL - Should not "the areodynamic (P2.433)" be "aerodynamic (P2.433)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.46) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFL - Should not "gravity (P2.432), or powered (P2.434)" be "powered landing system (P2.434)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.46) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFL - Should not "the standard warp-refitted frigate (YR2.25)" be "Warp-Refitted frigate (YR2.25)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.25) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFF - Should not "crash landing bonus in (P2.4311)" be "crash landing bonus (P2.4311)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.25) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFF - Should not "the areodynamic (P2.433)" be "aerodynamic (P2.433)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.25) MSSB-R02 Federation (Terran) WFF - Should not "gravity (P2.432), or powered (P2.434)" be "powered landing system (P2.434)?" - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.47) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - Should not "when a National Guard Cruiser (R2.116)" be "National guard heavy cruiser (R2.116)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.47) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - Should not "or conversions of heavy cruisers (YR2.13)" be "Vulcan early heavy cruiser (YR2.13)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.47) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - Should not "and two strike cruisers (YR5.4)" be "Early strike cruisers (YR5.4)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.47) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - Should not "lost two frigates (YR5.7)" be "Early frigates (YR5.7)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - Should not "Basically an enlarged version" be "Basically, an enlarged version"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - The scout paragraph should note that the special sensors are early years special sensors. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - In the tractor paragraph, the Type-W tractors have a YIS of 62 and the Type-S tractor is Y5, but this unit has a YIS of 1. Should not the tractor paragraph be updated to "Tractors: In Y5 these ships were refitted with type-S (Range 0, rear arc, towing only), refitted to type-W (Range 1, rear arc, towing only) in Y62, and refitted to type-Y (Range 1, 360°, can hold any legal target) at no cost in Y81, but never further refitted."? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - Tractors are not available until Y62, but the YIS for this unit is Y1. What should this system be until tractors are available? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - Warp engines have a YIS of Y62, should there be a note that the engines are Non-Tactical Warp Engines until Y62? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.48) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVSR - Should not "While the Vulcan heavy cruiser (YR2.13)" be "Vulcan early heavy cruiser (YR2.13)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.32) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVL - Should not "a Vulcan warp-refitted heavy cruiser (YR2.13)" be "Vulcan early heavy cruiser (YR2.13)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVD - The scout paragraph should note that the special sensors are early years special sensors. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVD - In the tractor paragraph, the Type-W tractors have a YIS of 62 and the Type-S tractor is Y5, but this unit has a YIS of 1. Should not the tractor paragraph be updated to "Tractors: In Y5 these ships were refitted with type-S (Range 0, rear arc, towing only), refitted to type-W (Range 1, rear arc, towing only) in Y62, and refitted to type-Y (Range 1, 360°, can hold any legal target) at no cost in Y81, but never further refitted."? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVD - Tractors are not available until Y62, but the YIS for this unit is Y1. What should this system be until tractors are available? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) YVD - Warp engines have a YIS of Y62, should there be a note that the engines are Non-Tactical Warp Engines until Y62? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.33) MSSB-R02 Federation (Vulcan) WVF - Should not "the Terran design (YR2.25)" be "Terran Warp-Refitted frigate (YR2.25)"? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.