Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Archive through September 10, 2014	25		09/10 05:37pm
	Archive through March 24, 2015	25		03/24 02:51pm
	Archive through June 26, 2017	25		06/26 02:01am
	Archive through February 20, 2022	25		03/26 10:14pm

Concur with Stewart, and Jeff, on the A-20, note how the parts we can see match the Type-III multi-warhead drones on the F-14.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, March 23, 2022 - 04:26 pm: Edit

(R2.FA8) Federation B-47 - In the sentence "Two Rigellian National Guard squadrons that saw combat service were quickly annihilated, and the type was completely phased out by the end of the year.", should "and the type was" be "and the bomber was"? Also, what year were these bombers phased out? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Mar 2022

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, March 24, 2022 - 12:35 pm: Edit

(R2.F15) Federation B-52E - In the B-52E section "but added two chaff packs" should be either "but added one chaff pack" or "but added an additional chaff pack" as adding two chaff packs would be a total of 3. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 10:52 am: Edit

(R2.F1) Federation F-14C - Should not the sentance "For the F-14D each pair of special rails (type-III drones) can be marked as carrying a single type-IV drone." be in the paragraph for the F-14D and not the F-14C? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Mar 2022.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 10:14 pm: Edit

Careful, Ken, you may be offered a job in Amarillo.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 27, 2022 - 02:20 pm: Edit

(R2.F10) Federation F-15C - Should F-15D in "For the F-15D two pairs of standard rails (type-I drones) can be marked as carrying a single type-IV drone." be F-15C? If not this sentance should be removed for the F-15C entry. It is stated in the F-15D entry. - Ken Kazinski, 27 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, April 13, 2022 - 08:01 pm: Edit

(R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - There is no mention of a mega-fighter pack for this bomber in the unit description. G3 has mega-fighter pack bombers listed. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 07:56 pm: Edit

(R2,FA14) Federation F-101 - Should not "(J11.11)" be "(J11.111)" as these pods against speed and DFR? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 10:51 pm: Edit

(R2.F4) MSSB-R2 - Federation F-16E - Annex #4 correctly shows that this unit would have had 2xVI drones. Per (R1.F7) Type-VI drones are retained. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - From J2 Errata "(R2.F16) The FB-111 is a two-space fighter that uses the bomber damage system and can only operate from ground bases", and CL25 "(R2.F16) The FB-111 is a two-space fighter that uses the bomber damage system and can only operate from ground bases, but just to be completely confusing it uses the F-111 weapons launch rate." MSSB-R2 does not have any mention of this. Is this unit a fighter or should it be a heavy figher? Also, does this mean that this figher uses (J14.3) for damage? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - As this unit is a fighter should not bomber be figher in "These mines must be purchased as part of the force; the bomber does not come with transporter bombs of its own."? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

(R2.F16) MSSB-R2 - Federation FB-111 - As this unit is a fighter should not bomber be figher in "if the bomber is crippled (a mine could still be dropped). Items in the bay cannot be used if the bomber is used as a scatter-pack (FD7.44)." - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

By Eric Snyder (Esnyder) on Friday, January 12, 2024 - 09:52 pm: Edit

(R2.18) Federation NCL - "The result was the 'new' light cruiser, which entered production in Y170" The F&E SIT lists the year available as Y169, and the Order of Battle shows production in Y169S. - Eric Snyder, 1 Jan 2024.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Saturday, January 13, 2024 - 02:19 am: Edit

Series production for the MSSB.