Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Archive through November 14, 2016	25		11/14 06:46pm
	Archive through April 26, 2022	25		11/29 04:37pm

Authentication Error

By JjdsiVonmeege on Wednesday, November 30, 2022 - 03:20 am: Edit

Authentication Error

By FjdsiVonmeege on Tuesday, February 28, 2023 - 09:27 am: Edit

Authentication Error

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 12:08 pm: Edit

(YR3.8) MSSB-R03 Klingon B4 - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Number of Shuttle Bays" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.8) MSSB-R03 Klingon B4 - Should not "hexrow" be "hex row" in "down the hexrow directly"? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.8) MSSB-R03 Klingon B4 - The YIS is listed as Y105‡ but the refit paragraphs state Y100 refits. Should there be a note that the Y100 refits were incorporated in the ship or should the Y100 refits be removed? A possible other solution would be to state that the B4 could be built earlier than Y105. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.8) MSSB-R03 Klingon B4 - Should not there be a note of when the ship would have been taken out of service? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.8) MSSB-R03 Klingon B4 - Where the other early years restrictions removed in Y120? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.6) MSSB-R03 Klingon C4 - Were the other early years restrictions removed in Y120? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.6) MSSB-R03 Klingon C4 - The known names paragraph states "None known" but SL285.0 (CL40) lists the name Conqueror. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.15) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4C - The known names paragraph states "None known", but Y2 (pg 31) shows the known names to be "Damnfighter, Darefighter, Darkfighter, Dawnfighter, Deathfighter, Deedfighter, Deepfighter, Deftfighter, Demonfighter, Devilfighter." Also, SL285.0 (CL40) lists "Khavek" as a known name. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.15) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4C - Were the other early years restrictions removed in Y120? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - Should not "D4E early exploration cruiser (YR3.16)" be "Early survey cruiser (YR3.16)"? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - Should not "(YR3.17), D4I early police cruiser (YR3.18)" be "Early police flagship cruiser (YR3.18)"? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - Should not "of the D3 (YR3.2)" be "D3 Warp-Refitted cruiser (YR3.2)"? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Assassin' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, unit found in product Y1, SH211.0. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Desolation' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, unit found in product CL24, SL205.0. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designations 'Fanatic', 'Fearsom', 'Ferocious', 'Fierce', 'Flamer' are missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see 'SL285.0'. Unit found in product CL40. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Gnasher' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see SP1320. Unit found in product CL12. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Harrower' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see SP1320. Unit found in product CL12. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Killer' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see SH211.0. Unit found in product Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Rascal' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see SL285.0. Unit found in product CL40. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.4) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4 - The designation 'Slayer' is missing from the known names paragraph. Note, see SH211.0. Unit found in product Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.16) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4E - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Scout:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.16) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4E - Should not "and D7E survey cruiser (R3.43)" be "D7E Mission survey cruiser (R3.43)"? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.17) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4G - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.17) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4G - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.17) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4G - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.18) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4I - As this ship is virtually identical to the D4 early cruiser, should not there be a note that this ship is under early year restrictions even though the YIS is Y124? Possibly change "The ship is virtually identical to the D4 early cruiser except that the disruptors are limited to a maximum range of 15 hexes." to "The ship is virtually identical to the D4 early cruiser except that the disruptors are limited to a maximum range of 15 hexes. All other systems are still under early years restrictions." - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.18) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4I - As this ship does not have Type-N tractors the tractor paragraph should be added after the UIM paragraph. "Tractors: Type-M (Range 2) but never extended further." - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.18) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4I - As this ship does not have range 5 transporters the transporter paragraph should be added after the UIM and Tractor paragraphs. "Transporters: Range 4 but never extended further." - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.18) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4I - Should not "a D6I police cruiser (R3.136)" be "D6I Internal security cruiser (R3.136)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.18) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4I - Should not "aging D3I warp-refitted police cruiser (YR3.26)" be "D3I Warp-Refitted police flagship cruiser (YR3.26)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.19) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4J - Should "[see (R3.151)]" be removed from "mothballs in Y142 [see (R3.151)]"? Rule (R3.151) is for the LD4J Naval Reserve Penal Cruiser. In (R3.151) there is no discussion of mothballing the D4Js in (R3.151), but only mothballing LD4Js and replacing them with D6Js. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.19) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4J - The Known names paragraph should have a period after "Guillotine". - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.20) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4N - There should be a period at the end of "SSD and counter are in Module Y2". - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.20) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4N - As this ship is supposed to project power and instill awe, should the early years restrictions be removed in Y120? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.20) MSSB-R03 Klingon D4N - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 04:37 pm: Edit

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The YIS for this unit is Y78. The Type-Y Tractor Beam has a YIS of Y80. The tractor beam paragraph should be updated to "Type-W (Towning Only, RA only); refitted to Type-Y (360°, Range 1, any legal target) in Y80 at no cost; refitted to type-M (Range 2) in Y120 at no cost but never extended further." - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The YIS for this unit is Y78. The range 2 transporter has a YIS of Y80. The transporter paragraph should be updated to "Range 1, extended to Range 2 in Y80 at no cost; extended to Range 3 in Y100 at no cost and to Range 4 in Y120 at no cost but never extended further." - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - Should not "and F4I early police frigate (YR3.29)" be "F4I Early years police frigate (YR3.29)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Devoted' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH212.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Fierce' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL24.Note: 'SL205.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Grappler' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH211.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Investigor' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH211.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Mailed Fist' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH212.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Raider' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL40.Note: 'SL285.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Reliable' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH212.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Repulse' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL40.Note: 'SL285.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.5) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4 - The designation 'Striker' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1.Note: 'SH211.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.21) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4G - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.21) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4G - Should not "(D15.84), two heavy-weapons squads (D15.81)" be "heavy weapons squad (D15.81)?" - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.21) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4G - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) MSSB-R03 Klingon F4J - Should not "Also like the F3J warp-refitted penal frigates" be "Also, like the F3J warp-refitted penal frigates"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 09:10 pm: Edit

(YR3.7) MSSB-R03 Klingon T4 - Should not "the later Tug-B (R3.9)" be "Fleet tug-a (R3.9)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.7) MSSB-R03 Klingon T4 - The designation 'Commissioner Taragon' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL40.Note: 'SL285.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - The refit, tractor and transporter paragraphs are missing. Should not the following be added before the SSD paragraph:
Refits:
Tractors: Type-Y (Range 1, 360¡, any legal target); refitted to type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y120.
Transporters: Range 2; extended to Range 3 at no cost in Y100; extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y120.
- Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not the "Landing force:" paragraph come after the "Interbay Shuttle Transfers" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not the "If the pod is dropped by a tug" paragraph come after the "Landing force:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not the "Shuttles:" paragraph come after the "Operation:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not "Tug-A (R3.9), Tug-B (R3.10)" be "Transport tug-b (R3.10)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not "of the Tug-A (R3.9)" be "Fleet tug-a (R3.9)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - Should not "F6T battle transport; see (YR3.32)" be "see Warp-Refitted strategic transport (YR3.32)"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) MSSB-R03 Klingon P-YT3 - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 07, 2025 - 07:50 am: Edit

(R3.R53) MSSB-R03 Klingon - Per R3.R53 J-boom shields are: D6J/D4J/D3J = 13; D5J/DWJ/D5JX = 10; E7J/F6J/F5J/F4J/F3J = 9, E4J = 7. Per module Y2 (pg 35) the F4J shields #3, #4, #5 boxes are only 7. Should not the "F4J" be 7? Update "E7J/F6J/F5J/F4J/F3J = 9" to "E7J/F6J/F5J/F3J = 9, F4J/E4J = 7." - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(R3.R53) MSSB-R03 Klingon - Per R3.R53 J-boom shields are: D6J/D4J/D3J = 13; D5J/DWJ/D5JX = 10; E7J/F6J/F5J/F4J/F3J = 9, E4J = 7. Per module Y2 (pg 35) shield #3, #4, #5 boxes are only 5. Should not the "F3J" be 5? Update "E7J/F6J/F5J/F4J/F3J = 9" to "E7J/F6J/F5J = 9, F4J/E4J = 7, F3J = 5."- Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, December 12, 2025 - 10:51 am: Edit

(YR3.9) MSSB-R03 Klingon C3 - There should be a paragraph for the year out of service for this unit. - Ken Kazinski, 07 Dec 2025.

(YR3.9) MSSB-R03 Klingon C3 - Should not "D4 early cruiser (YR3.3)" be "Warp-Refitted frigate (YR3.3)"? - Ken Kazinski, 07 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - Should not "D3E warp-refitted exploration cruiser (YR3.10)" be "D3E Warp-Refitted survey cruiser (YR3.10)"? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - Should not "(YR3.25), D3I warp-refitted police cruiser (YR3.26)" be "D3I Warp-Refitted police flagship cruiser (YR3.26)"? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Desolation' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL29. Note: 'SL227.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Destruction' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL29. Note: 'SL227.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Insight' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product MSSB-R03. Note: 'Converted to D3E.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Investigation' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product MSSB-R03. Note: 'Converted to D3E.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Kartal's Hammer' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1. Note: 'SH210.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Retaliation' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL31. Note: 'SL236.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Retribution' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL31. Note: 'SL236.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Vengence' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL31. Note: 'SL236.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Warleader' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Future. Note: 'SP.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.2) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3 - The designation 'Warmaster' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product Y1. Note: 'SH210.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.10) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3E - "sspecial" in "The Klingons had not developed sspecial sensors small enough" should be "special". - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.10) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3E - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Scout:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.10) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3E - Should not "and D7E survey cruiser (R3.43)" be "D7E Mission survey cruiser (R3.43)"? - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.10) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3E - There is no information when this unit went out of service. This unit was never refitted after Y81 and the rule states "this ship was not in service when UIMs became available", which is Y165, this unit should have a Year Out of Service before Y165. From (YR3.16) The first D4E early survey cruiser was built in Y82 intended as a
replacement for a D3E warp-refitted survey cruiser" I would propose the year out of service to be Y92, 10 years after the introduction of the D4E. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Dec 2025.

(YR3.11) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3G - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2025.

(YR3.11) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3G - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2025.

(YR3.11) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3G - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2025.

(YR3.26) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3I - Should not "Of course almost all ships" be "Of course, almost all ships"? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.26) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3I - Should not "the disruptors had a much reduced range." be "the disruptors had a much-reduced range."? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.26) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3I - Should not "The Insightful Chieftain's principle occupation was showing" be "The Insightful Chieftain's principal occupation was showing"? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.27) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3N - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.27) MSSB-R03 Klingon D3N - The seeking weapon paragraph that references rule (F3.21), but the unit is listed as only being able to control seeking weapons equal to half its sensor rating. The seeking weapon paragraph, "Seeking weapons: This ship can control a number of seeking weapons equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)." and not "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.21)". - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, December 12, 2025 - 10:51 am: Edit

(R3.R53) MSSB-R03 Kligon Booms - Per (R3.R53) "J-boom shields are: D6J/D4J/D3J = 13" but the D3J's shields are 15/12/10/10/10/12. The boom would have more shields than the complete boom and aft sections. Should not (R3.R53) be updated so the D3J has 10 shields all around? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 14, 2025 - 09:08 am: Edit

(YR3.3) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3 - The designation 'Agonizer' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL31. Note: 'SL236.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.3) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3 - The designation 'Bloodletter' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL31. Note: 'SL236.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.3) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3 - The designation 'Fury' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL29. Note: 'SL227.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.3) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3 - The designation 'Hell Spite' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL29. Note: 'SL227.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.3) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3 - The designation 'Pummeler' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in the scenario files on the ADB website.'. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

(YR3.30) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3G - Should not the "Boom:" paragraph come after the "Shuttles:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.30) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3G - Should not "two commando teams (D15.84)" be "commando squad (D15.84)?" - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.30) MSSB-R03 Klingon F3G - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.31) MSSB-R03 Klingon E1 - There should be "Nimble" paragraph "This ship is nimble (C11.0)." before the seeking weapons paragraph. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.31) MSSB-R03 Klingon E1I - There should be a listing for the E1I and I would propose the rule be YR3.33 or YR3.31A. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.33) MSSB-R03 Klingon E1I - I would suggest adding "(YR3.33) E1I WARP-REFITTED POLICE ESCORT: An E1I warp-refitted escort would just be an E1 warp-refitted escort operated by the Internal Security Force. Both the Deep Space Fleet and the Internal Security Force operated identical ships.
This is a variant of the E1 warp-refitted escort (YR3.31).
Boom: The boom of the E1I warp-refitted escort series of ships cannot be separated.
This ship is nimble (C11.0).
Seeking weapons: This ship can control a number of seeking weapons equal to its sensor rating (F3.21). The drone rack on this ship is type-F (FD3.6) and the drone rack is subject to chain reaction (D12.3).
UIM: None; this ship was not in service when UIMs became available and the range of its disruptors are too short in any case.
Refits
Tractors: Type-W (Range 1, rear arc, towing only); refitted to type-Y (Range 1, 360¡, can hold any legal target) at no cost in Y80, but never extended further.
Transporters: Range 1; extended to Range 2 at no cost in Y80, but never extended further.
SSD and counters are in Module Y3.
Known names: None known.
- Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.31) MSSB-R03 Klingon E1 - Should not "warp-refitted police escort (YR3.31)" be "warp-refitted police escort (YR3.33)"? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.31) MSSB-R03 Klingon E1 - Should not "were converted to E1Ts (YR3.32)" be "E1Ts warp-refitted strategic transport (YR3.32)"? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

(YR3.31) Module Y3 Klingon E1 - Should not the 'Base Hull' paragraph, "Variants include the E1I warp-refitted police escort (YR3.31) (mentioned in rule)" be updated to "Variants include the E1I warp-refitted police escort (YR3.33) (mentioned in rule)"? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 14, 2025 - 09:09 am: Edit

(R3.R53) MSSB-R03 BOOMS: (R3.R53) states "J-boom shields are: D6J/D4J/D3J = 13; D5J/DWJ/D5JX = 10; E7J/F6J/F5J/F4J/F3J = 9, E4J = 7." The F3J booms shields are 9/7/5/5/5/7. The separated boom would have more shield boxes than the complete ship. Possibly create a new entry for the F3J to "F3J = 5." - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.