This topic is now open.

Jean
WebMom

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, July 28, 2019 - 01:24 am: Edit

Sigh.

Found an error.

(R6.3) The base hull and variants paragraph is repeated above and below the picture. Ryan J Opel, 28 Jul 2019.

By John Wyszynski (Starsabre) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 09:13 am: Edit

(R6.A12) to (R6.A17) say these ships are in Captain's Log #54. The CL Index says #53 (I don't have CL #53 yet.)

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 02:08 pm: Edit

John Wyszynski:

Argh. When the system was set up, the LDR ships were to appear in the next Captain's Log, i.e., #53, which was then expected to be released soon after the Lyran Democratic Republic Master Starship Book was released. Work was then progressing on the Gorn Master Starship Book, and it was expected that it would be released after Captain's Log #53 and any ships generated by it would appear in Captain's Log #54. The schedule, as you are all aware, got scrambled, and when Captain's Log #53 was shaping up, it was decided to put the Gorn SSDs in that book rather than wait for Captain's Log #54 (which is currently penciled in to have Tholian SSDs generated by the Tholian Master Starship Book).

No one thought to update the "product where found" paragraphs associated with those ships, and so here we are.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 04:16 pm: Edit

Somewhere in the book "mech link" was missing the hyphen. It is such a minor change that I have just inserted the hyphen, and I do not remember where it was.

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 05:40 pm: Edit

here it is "-"

No need to thank me!

grin!

By Eddie Crutchfield (Librarian101) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 07:27 pm: Edit

Jeff there is a rumor going around the Steve has access to the launch codes for tomahawk cruise missiles, let me know when it arrives.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 08:50 pm: Edit

This is why we do the PDF first.

By Nick Blank (Nickgb) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 11:13 pm: Edit

Page 76, G-101A Heavy Fighter, left column, under Plasma Torpedo Rails:

"Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), three on each
wing..."

Should be "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), two on each wing..."

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, August 19, 2019 - 05:12 pm: Edit

Current Error List:

Somewhere in the book "mech link" was missing the hyphen. REPLY: It is such a minor change that I have just inserted the hyphen, and I do not remember where it was.

(R6.3) CL: The base hull and variants paragraph is repeated above and below the picture. Ryan J Opel, 28 Jul 2019. REPLY: Duplicate text deleted.

(R6.51) CCH: Balcony paragraph should start "Balcony positions." REPLY: Fixed.

(R6.A13) MSSB-R06 (Captain’s Log #53) Gorn HVH: The HVH is listed as a variant of the (R6.12) HDD Heavy Destroyer, but the HVH is not listed in the "variants of" paragraph of the (R6.12) HDD Heavy Destroyer. - Ken Kazinski, 03 Aug 2019. REPLY: Added.

(R6.A12) to (R6.A17) say these ships are in Captain’s Log #54. The CL Index says #53 (I don't have CL #53 yet.) REPLY: Argh. When the system was set up, the LDR ships were to appear in the next Captain's Log, i.e., #53, which was then expected to be released soon after the Lyran Democratic Republic Master Starship Book was released. Work was then progressing on the Gorn Master Starship Book, and it was expected that it would be released after Captain’s Log #53 and any ships generated by it would appear in Captain’s Log #54. The schedule, as you are all aware, got scrambled, and when Captain’s Log #53 was shaping up, it was decided to put the Gorn SSDs in that book rather than wait for Captain’s Log #54 (which is currently penciled in to have Tholian SSDs generated by the Tholian Master Starship Book).
No one thought to update the "product where found" paragraphs associated with those ships, and so here we are.

(R6.F14A) G-101A Heavy Fighter, left column, under Plasma Torpedo Rails: "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), three on each wing..." Should be "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), two on each wing..." REPLY: Fixed.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Sunday, September 08, 2019 - 04:00 pm: Edit

deleted by author as it was posted in error.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Saturday, September 28, 2019 - 05:36 pm: Edit

There have been no further reported errors since 29 July 19. Anyone have anything else to report?

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, May 11, 2022 - 10:36 pm: Edit

(R6.F9A) Gorn BMR-A - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F9B) Gorn BMR-B - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F9C) Gorn BMR-C - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F01-3) Gorn G-1 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F14A) Gorn G-101A - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F14B) Gorn G-101B - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F3E) Gorn G-10E - Per R1.F7, Assult fighters do not get additional PL-K rails. The sentance "The Confederation’s technicians were able to add two small rails for plasma-K torpedoes in the conversion." should be removed. - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, May 15, 2022 - 10:58 am: Edit

(R6.F) Gorn - In many of the fighter descriptions dogfight rating is DFR. See (R6.F01-4) and (R6.F4) for examples. For consistency, should not DFR spelled out as dogfight rating? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-4) Gorn G-2 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F4) Gorn G-30 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F7) Gorn G-32 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F12) Gorn G-40 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F13) Gorn G-42 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-1) Gorn G-52 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-2) Gorn GB-111 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-2) Gorn GB-111 - (J16.241) in "A mega pack was developed for this fighter adding two plasma-D torpedo rails (J16.241)." should be (J16.243). (J16.243) states "In the case of a fighter armed with plasma-F, D, or K..." while (J16.241) states "In the case of fighters armed only with drones and phasers (or only with drones)..." - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-3) Gorn G-1 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F10) Gorn BMR-H - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.