This topic is now open.

Jean
WebMom

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, July 28, 2019 - 01:24 am: Edit

Sigh.

Found an error.

(R6.3) The base hull and variants paragraph is repeated above and below the picture. Ryan J Opel, 28 Jul 2019.

By John Wyszynski (Starsabre) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 09:13 am: Edit

(R6.A12) to (R6.A17) say these ships are in Captain's Log #54. The CL Index says #53 (I don't have CL #53 yet.)

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 02:08 pm: Edit

John Wyszynski:

Argh. When the system was set up, the LDR ships were to appear in the next Captain's Log, i.e., #53, which was then expected to be released soon after the Lyran Democratic Republic Master Starship Book was released. Work was then progressing on the Gorn Master Starship Book, and it was expected that it would be released after Captain's Log #53 and any ships generated by it would appear in Captain's Log #54. The schedule, as you are all aware, got scrambled, and when Captain's Log #53 was shaping up, it was decided to put the Gorn SSDs in that book rather than wait for Captain's Log #54 (which is currently penciled in to have Tholian SSDs generated by the Tholian Master Starship Book).

No one thought to update the "product where found" paragraphs associated with those ships, and so here we are.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 04:16 pm: Edit

Somewhere in the book "mech link" was missing the hyphen. It is such a minor change that I have just inserted the hyphen, and I do not remember where it was.

By Jeff Wile (Jswile) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 05:40 pm: Edit

here it is "-"

No need to thank me!

grin!

By Eddie Crutchfield (Librarian101) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 07:27 pm: Edit

Jeff there is a rumor going around the Steve has access to the launch codes for tomahawk cruise missiles, let me know when it arrives.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 08:50 pm: Edit

This is why we do the PDF first.

By Nick Blank (Nickgb) on Monday, July 29, 2019 - 11:13 pm: Edit

Page 76, G-101A Heavy Fighter, left column, under Plasma Torpedo Rails:

"Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), three on each
wing..."

Should be "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), two on each wing..."

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, August 19, 2019 - 05:12 pm: Edit

Current Error List:

Somewhere in the book "mech link" was missing the hyphen. REPLY: It is such a minor change that I have just inserted the hyphen, and I do not remember where it was.

(R6.3) CL: The base hull and variants paragraph is repeated above and below the picture. Ryan J Opel, 28 Jul 2019. REPLY: Duplicate text deleted.

(R6.51) CCH: Balcony paragraph should start "Balcony positions." REPLY: Fixed.

(R6.A13) MSSB-R06 (Captain’s Log #53) Gorn HVH: The HVH is listed as a variant of the (R6.12) HDD Heavy Destroyer, but the HVH is not listed in the "variants of" paragraph of the (R6.12) HDD Heavy Destroyer. - Ken Kazinski, 03 Aug 2019. REPLY: Added.

(R6.A12) to (R6.A17) say these ships are in Captain’s Log #54. The CL Index says #53 (I don't have CL #53 yet.) REPLY: Argh. When the system was set up, the LDR ships were to appear in the next Captain's Log, i.e., #53, which was then expected to be released soon after the Lyran Democratic Republic Master Starship Book was released. Work was then progressing on the Gorn Master Starship Book, and it was expected that it would be released after Captain’s Log #53 and any ships generated by it would appear in Captain’s Log #54. The schedule, as you are all aware, got scrambled, and when Captain’s Log #53 was shaping up, it was decided to put the Gorn SSDs in that book rather than wait for Captain’s Log #54 (which is currently penciled in to have Tholian SSDs generated by the Tholian Master Starship Book).
No one thought to update the "product where found" paragraphs associated with those ships, and so here we are.

(R6.F14A) G-101A Heavy Fighter, left column, under Plasma Torpedo Rails: "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), three on each wing..." Should be "Four plasma-D torpedo rails (J4.28), two on each wing..." REPLY: Fixed.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Sunday, September 08, 2019 - 04:00 pm: Edit

deleted by author as it was posted in error.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Saturday, September 28, 2019 - 05:36 pm: Edit

There have been no further reported errors since 29 July 19. Anyone have anything else to report?

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, May 11, 2022 - 10:36 pm: Edit

(R6.F9A) Gorn BMR-A - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F9B) Gorn BMR-B - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F9C) Gorn BMR-C - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F01-3) Gorn G-1 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F14A) Gorn G-101A - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F14B) Gorn G-101B - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

(R6.F3E) Gorn G-10E - Per R1.F7, Assult fighters do not get additional PL-K rails. The sentance "The Confederation’s technicians were able to add two small rails for plasma-K torpedoes in the conversion." should be removed. - Ken Kazinski, 11 May 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, May 15, 2022 - 10:58 am: Edit

(R6.F) Gorn - In many of the fighter descriptions dogfight rating is DFR. See (R6.F01-4) and (R6.F4) for examples. For consistency, should not DFR spelled out as dogfight rating? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-4) Gorn G-2 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F4) Gorn G-30 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F7) Gorn G-32 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F12) Gorn G-40 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F13) Gorn G-42 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and DFR." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-1) Gorn G-52 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-2) Gorn GB-111 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Two “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-2) Gorn GB-111 - (J16.241) in "A mega pack was developed for this fighter adding two plasma-D torpedo rails (J16.241)." should be (J16.243). (J16.243) states "In the case of a fighter armed with plasma-F, D, or K..." while (J16.241) states "In the case of fighters armed only with drones and phasers (or only with drones)..." - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F01-3) Gorn G-1 - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

(R6.F10) Gorn BMR-H - The plasma torpedo rail paragraph lists "Four “pod rails” (J11.11) which count against speed and dogfight rating." (J11.11) states "... does not affect the performance of the fighter." Should not the rule be (J11.111) and not (J11.11)? - Ken Kazinski, 15 May 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, February 03, 2026 - 09:51 pm: Edit

(R6.M1-5) MSSB-R06 Gorn Ground Forces - There is a R6.M1-51 to R6.M1-53, but the R6.M1-5 Battalion organization chart is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 11 January 2026.

(R1.PF2-R6) MSSB-R06 Gorn Pterodactyl-S - The SSD graphic is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 11 January 2026.

(R1.PF6-R6) MSSB-R06 Gorn Pterodactyl-L - The SSD graphic is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 11 January 2026.

(R1.PF8-R6) MSSB-R06 Gorn Pterodactyl-Q - The SSD graphic is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 11 January 2026.

(R1.PF9-R6) MSSB-R06 Gorn Pterodactyl-R - The SSD graphic is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 11 January 2026.

(YR6.19) MSSB-R06 Gorn YBB - Should "The Y105 refit was incorporated into the design, but is shown separately to allow players to experiment with an earlier introduction date for the ship." be updated to state if the ship was introduced earlier the Transporters start at range 2 and are upgraded to range 3 in Y100? - Ken Kazinski, 12 January 2026.

(YR6.19) MSSB-R06 Gorn YBB - Should not "the Godzilla (R6.47)" be "the Battleship Godzilla (R6.47)"? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jan 2026.

(YR6.14) MSSB-R06 Gorn YDN - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2026.

(YR6.6) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCC - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.5) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCL - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.5) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCL - The designation 'Gnasher' is missing from the known names paragraph. Unit found in product CL33. Note: 'SL248.0.'. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.5) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCL - The (YR6.5) Gorn YCL+ Early Light Cruiser should be listed as a variant of the YCL but it is not listed in a 'variant of' paragraph. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.15) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCG - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.15) MSSB-R06 Gorn YCG - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.16) MSSB-R06 Gorn YSR - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.7) MSSB-R06 Gorn YDD - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.7) MSSB-R06 Gorn YDD - The (YR6.7) Gorn YDD+ Early Destroyer should be listed as a variant of the YDD but it is not listed in a 'variant of' paragraph. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.8) MSSB-R06 Gorn YFF - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18A) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-C - In (YR6.18A) The Federation report name is "None assigned.", but (R6.6) shows "Dinosaur Egg-C" (YR6.18A) should be the same as (R6.6). - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(R6.6) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-C - Should not "time of release. See (R6.94)" be "Destroyer transport (R6.94)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(R6.6) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-C - Should not "to a destroyer transport; see (YR6.20)" be "Early years strategic transport (YR6.20)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - Should not "hexrow" be "hex row"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - Should not the "Federation Codename" paragraph come after the "Interbay Shuttle Transfers" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - Should not the "Shuttles:" paragraph come after the "Operation:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - Should not "time of release. See (R6.94)" be "Destroyer transport (R6.94)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - Should not "to a destroyer transport; see (YR6.20)" be "Early years strategic transport (YR6.20)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.17) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YT - There should be a known names paragraph - "Known names: Pods were never given formal names." - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - Should not the "Federation Codename" paragraph come after the "Interbay Shuttle Transfers" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - Should not the "Shuttles:" paragraph come after the "Operation:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - Should not "time of release. See (R6.94)" be "Destroyer transport (R6.94)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - Should not "to a destroyer transport; see (YR6.20)" be "Early years strategic transport (YR6.20)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.18) MSSB-R06 Gorn P-YSL - There should be a known names paragraph - "Known names: Pods were never given formal names." - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.10) MSSB-R06 Gorn WBI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.3) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCA - Should not "(YR6.13), the warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR6.13A)" be "Laser-Armed warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR6.13A)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.3) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCA - Should not "and improved warp-refitted command cruiser (YR6.21B)" be "Warp-Refitted improved command cruiser (YR6.21B)"? - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.11) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.21) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCC - The unit description shows this unit can control a number of seeking weapons equal to its sensor rating, but the refitted units, (YR6.21A) WCCL and the (YR6.21B) WCCI, description state "seeking weapons equal to half its sensor rating". Should not the WCC also only allow for seeking weapons equal to half its sensor rating? - Ken Kazinski, 19 Jan 2026.

(YR6.21B) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCCI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 19 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCG - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 20 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCG - Should not "least one warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR6.13A)" be "Laser-Armed warp-refitted commando cruiser (YR6.13A)"? - Ken Kazinski, 20 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCG - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 20 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13A) MSSB-R06 Gorn WGL - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" - Ken Kazinski, 21 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13A) MSSB-R06 Gorn WGL - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 21 Jan 2026.

(YR6.22) MSSB-R06 Gorn WCL - Should not ", and if necessary conduct independent patrols" be ", and if necessary, conduct independent patrols"? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Jan 2026.

(YR6.22B) MSSB-R06 Gorn WLI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 23 Jan 2026.

(YR6.24B) MSSB-R06 Gorn WSI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 24 Jan 2026.

(YR6.4) MSSB-R06 Gorn WDD - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 24 Jan 2026.

(YR6.4) MSSB-R06 Gorn WDD - The known names should contain "Tusk" from Captain's Log #29, SL225.0. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Jan 2026.

(YR6.12) MSSB-R06 Gorn WDI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 24 Jan 2026.

(YR6.23) MSSB-R06 Gorn WFF - As all these ships were refitted to either the WFL or WFI by Y74. The transporter refit is in Y90, which is after the last ship was refitted. Should not the transporter paragraph state that the transporers are range 1 and not improved further? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Jan 2026.

(YR6.23) MSSB-R06 Gorn WFF - The (YR6.23A) and (YR6.23B) are refits of the WFF, but the WFF can control seeking weapons equal to its sensor rating, while the WFL and WFI cannot. Should not the WFF be limited to controlling the number of seeking weapons equal to half its sensor rating? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Jan 2026.

(YR6.23A) MSSB-R06 Gorn WFL - In the refit paragraph the rule (YR6.11) is for the Improved Warp-Refitted Cruiser. The refit paragraph "upgraded to the warp-refitted improved frigate (YR6.11)" should be updated to "upgraded to the warp-refitted improved frigate (YR6.23B)" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Jan 2026.

(YR6.23A) MSSB-R06 Gorn WFL - Should not "becoming identical to the WFI (YR6.22B)" be "Warp-Refitted improved light cruiser (YR6.22B)"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(YR6.23B) MSSB-R06 Gorn WFI - Should not "equal to its half its sensor rating (F3.211)" be "equal to half its sensor rating (F3.211)?" Remove the first "its". - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(YR1.3-6F) MSSB-R06 Gorn YBS+ - The tractor and transporter YIS for the Gorn is Y120 which is after the YBS+ Year In Service. The tractor paragraph should be Tractors: Type-Y (Range 1, 360°, any legal target), upgraded to Type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y120, but never extended further. The transporter paragraph should be Transporters: Range 3, extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y120, but never extended further." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Feb 2026.

(YR1.3A-6C) MSSB-R06 Gorn ECBS - Module Y2 unit desciption states "Tractors: Type-Y (Range 1, 360°, any legal target), refitted to Type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y120." and "Transporters: Range 2, extended to Range 3 at no cost in Y100, extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y120." Should these refits be added to MSSB-R06, with the exception Y100 should be Y105. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Feb 2026.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Wednesday, February 11, 2026 - 03:06 pm: Edit

topic down loaded to this point.