Annex #7A Color of Counters- add "Empire: Peladine…………………………Ship: Blue…………………Background: None……………Counter: Black, From Special Countersheet #1 S.Hantke 13Jan14.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, February 09, 2014 - 07:05 pm: Edit

Annex 3 (pg 14) The listing for OAS should be OAL (R1.45A). - Ken Kazinski, 9 Feb 2014.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 - 02:19 pm: Edit

R12:

Lyran DDV Year in Service should read Y169 not Y120. Ryan J Opel, 8 Apr 2014

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 - 03:51 pm: Edit

R12:

Lyran DDV Year in Service should read Y169 not Y120. Ryan J Opel, 8 Apr 2014

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, April 21, 2014 - 08:26 am: Edit

(R4.12) Module AM Romulan SE - All Romulan War Eagle Heavy Cruiser And Variants have the Gravity Landing System per Annex 7B. This unit should have a "GL" note. This might just be a note after the class instead of putting it on each line - Ken Kazinski, 21 Apr 2014.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Saturday, May 10, 2014 - 02:55 pm: Edit

R7.7 Black Widow Carrier. G3, the F&E SIT, and the ships carrier escort has the ship with an availability date of Y169. SH6 in Y167 has the ship defending against a Klingon attack. Is the availability date wrong or is the scenario wrong? Ryan J Opel 10 May 2014

R7.28 Escort Patrol Corvette. G3, the F&E SIT, and the ships carrier escort has the ship with an availability date of Y169. SH6 in Y167 has the ship defending against a Klingon attack. Is the availability date wrong or is the scenario wrong? Ryan J Opel 10 May 2014

Answer for this is needed for F&E scenario development for product scheduled to be released soon.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Saturday, May 10, 2014 - 10:22 pm: Edit

Does the prototype rule allow for one or two ships before the general YIS date (don't have books handy)?

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Monday, May 19, 2014 - 11:47 am: Edit

According to the notes in the SFB Master Ship Chart, the Year in Service is the beginning of series production, prototypes may have been in service 1-2 years earlier. The appearance of these two ships (Tholian BW and PCE) in Y167 is simply the prototypes being used in combat as part of testing the concept. It is not a contradiction but within the limits of the rules. Other empires were fielding carriers and it was natural for the Tholians to test the concept also.

Note that "series production" is also known as the "Squadron Service Date" when at least three ships of a given class are in service. For Size Class 2 ships the year in service is the prototype date, i.e., when the first ship was launched. Some smaller and easier to produce ships (e.g., size class 4 and smaller in general, some size class 3 ships, i.e., "war cruisers" may have had more than three ships in service on the given "series production date," that is by the end of a full year there may have been more than just three such ships in service.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - 02:22 pm: Edit

Annex 7G - Gorn HVS - This unit is not listed in the MSC. I think this should be the HSV (R6.70). - Ken Kazinski, 27 May 2014.

Annex 10 - Gorn HDD Group - There is a HVS listed but this unit is not listed in the MSC. I think this should be the HSV (R6.70). - Ken Kazinski, 27 May 2014.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, June 14, 2014 - 11:53 am: Edit

(R1.44) Module R06 General TSS - Shouldn't the Annex 3 listing for Crew Units be 3+60 as this would be the maximum configuration and not what it is shown on the SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jun 2014.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, June 15, 2014 - 08:29 pm: Edit

(R1.204) Module X1 General APX - Annex 3 shows the movement cost is 0.25 while the SSD shows 1/5 (0.2). - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jun 2014.

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Sunday, July 13, 2014 - 06:45 pm: Edit

HYDRAN LGE - Year in service should be Y167, per class history in CL 36. Note that, as a SC2 hull, the LGE is automatically code Y1 and cannot be prototyped. - Jason E. Schaff, 13 July 2014

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 - 11:53 pm: Edit

(R3.94) Module G3 Klingon F5R - The unit has 'LA' note and the Limited Aegis (D13.4) system. Units with this system should not have the 'LA' note. - Ken Kazinski, 23 Jun 2015.

By Eric Snyder (Esnyder) on Sunday, January 31, 2016 - 03:06 am: Edit

FED SDA - section note refers to the ship type as 'SDSA' which is not consistent with table entry, SSD, or R2.94A description. - Eric Snyder, 31 Jan 2016.

By Paul Franz (Andromedan) on Saturday, February 13, 2016 - 05:54 pm: Edit

(R10.0) Andromedan Invaders

I just noticed that there are 2 CCRs listed. One in the "Andromedan Conquistador Light Cruiser and Variants" section and One in "Andromedan Cobra Medium Satellite Ship and Variants".

The One in the "Cobra" section should be a CBR.

By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Monday, January 02, 2017 - 07:56 am: Edit

General MON – Since this is the monitor without any pallets then the BPV should be 70/130 (not 85/145) per the 2014 SSD – Jeff Coutu, 2 Jan 17

General MON+P - BPV should be 85/145 (not 100/160) per the 2014 SSD - Jeff Coutu, 2 Jan 17

General MON+SC - BPV should be 100/160 (not 115/175) per the 2014 SSD - Jeff Coutu, 2 Jan 17

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, January 03, 2017 - 08:00 pm: Edit

These were reported back in 2006.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Monday, February 06, 2017 - 05:22 pm: Edit

FEDERATION MASTER FIGHTER CHART

E4-6BM: Should this unit have 16 damage points instead of the basic E4-B's 14? (Nick Samaras, February 6, 2017)

E4-6CM: Should this unit have 16 damage points instead of the basic E4-C's 14? (Nick Samaras, February 6, 2017)

B-52DM: Should year of service be Y179 instead of Y178? No other Fed megafighter pack has an earlier date than Y179.(Nick Samaras, February 6, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:03 pm: Edit

GORN MASTER FIGHTER CHART

G-18EM: Has same BPV (12) as the non-megafighter version. (Nick Samaras, February 8, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:03 pm: Edit

Klingon Master Fighter Chart

Z-1DM: Dogfight rating not reduced, should be -1 to be consistent. (Nick Samaras, February 7, 2017)

Z-3EM: YIS should be Y177. (Nick Samaras, February 7, 2017)

Z-B2M: BPV should be 43.5, not 43/5.(Nick Samaras, February 7, 2017)

Z-B4M: Dogfight rating should be -4, not improved to 0. (Nick Samaras, February 7, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:04 pm: Edit

KZINTI MASTER FIGHTER CHART

ABMRM: Confirm BPV is 40.6, not 40.5? (Nick Samaras, February 8, 2017)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 07:24 am: Edit

Disregard line items regarding DFR for Z-1DM, Z-B4M. Just noticed the corrections in the Module G4 topic

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, November 05, 2018 - 11:58 am: Edit

Will there be an update of this product anytime soon?

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Saturday, November 10, 2018 - 03:37 pm: Edit

Colonel Strong:

I do not know if "any time soon" can be answered, but there is going to be an update at some point in order to incorporate not just known corrections, but products published since Module G3 was printed.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, January 04, 2021 - 12:12 am: Edit

Page 144 - "shutles" should be "shuttles" - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2021.

Page 144 - "makred" should be "marked" - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2021.

Page 144 - Should not "The dogfighting rating" be "The dogfight rating"? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2021.