Annex 3 - Page 44 - Romulan CNH - The first sentence of MSSB-R4 states "A late-war refit of the existing Condor dreadnoughts," should this unit have a "R" note? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 44 - (R4.49) Romulan PHX - The SSD (R4, pg 6) shows the YIS to be Y182 and there is a errata note during MSSB-R4 stating the YIS officially changed to Y182. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 44 - (R4.101) Romulan OMH-B - As this unit was actually completed, should the warship status be changed to LP2 and remove the note at the end? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 44 - (R4.101) Romulan OMH-B - As this unit was actually completed in Y190, but Annex 3 in module R7 shows a YIS of 176, should not this unit have a Y2 note and update the YIS to 190? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 44 - (R4.122) Romulan SHX - Per MSSB-R4 this is a fast unit and should have a "F" note. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.29) Romulan SUB - This unit's ship type should be SUB and not SUB-B.
MSSB-R4 and the SSD in module J-2020 (pg 35) show sthis unit's ship type to be SUB. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.82) Romulan SUN - This unit's ship type should be SUN and not SUP-N.
MSSB-R4 and the SSD in module R5 (pg 18) shows this unit's ship type to be SUB. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.136) Romulan VHK - The VHK was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.135) Romulan GHA - The GHA was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.0) Romulan SPV - The BPV for this unit should be the Sparrowhawk base hull cost, 90, plus the two SPV Carrier Modules, 37/22 = 127/112. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 45 - (R4.0) Romulan SPV - The Type-V modules (SFT #9, pg 8) does not have heavy fighters. There are 3 "=" and 3 "+" fighter boxes. Should not the spare shuttles either be 2 or 1 + 1A, if using the previously defined "A" is an assault fighter? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.0) Romulan SPV - As the SPV modules do not carry heavy fighters, but single space fighters, the note should be "V" and not "VH." - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.89) Romulan SBH-V - The SBH-V is listed in Annex 7G. Should it not also have a listing in Annex 3? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.212) Romulan SABX-V - The SABX-V is listed in Annex 7G. Should it not also have a listing in Annex 3? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.28A) - The convention for pods/packs is to use 0's for crew units and boarding parties. The explosion strength should be +0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.28A) - Should there be a note that this is a pack and not a ship? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.137) Romulan SKR - The SKR was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.137A) Romulan SKRA - The SKRA was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.138) Romulan JH - The JH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.124) Romulan SPT - Should not the turn mode be "B†" as this would be the best turn mode. Most tugs have the same turn mode for 0 or 1 pod but the SPT does not. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126A) Romulan P-B - Should not this pod have the same note as the Klingon P-B4 ped, R3-N2 - Two carrier and/or battle pods will not increase the command rating any more than one will? Or should there be a new note for Romulan pods? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126B) Romulan P-SC - The unit type is listed as P-S9, but MSSB-R4 and the SSD (R9, pg 28) show the unit type to be P-SC. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126B) Romulan P-SC - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126C) Romulan P-SD - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126F) Romulan P-HV - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126G) Romulan P-TT - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126H) Romulan P-PF - The BPV should be 30/10 which is the BPV listed on the SSD in R9, page 28. There is also an errata note from R9 stating the BPV should be 30/10. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126H) Romulan P-PF - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126I) Romulan P-PT - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126J) Romulan P-PR - By convention, when there are no spare shuttles a "-" is used and not 0. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126H) Romulan P-K - This unit is missing from the Annex. It is shown on the R9 SSD page 28. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 46 - (R4.126) Romulan Pods - All of the pods are missing the degree symbol (when detached). - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 01, 2022 - 10:12 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 47 - (R4.32A) Romulan KRL - MSSB-R4 lists this unit's rule a 32A and not just 32. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.A10) Romulan KE7 - Should not this unit have the "PUR" note (Purchased) also? CL35 annex (pg 104) shows this to be a purchased unit. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.140) Romulan KRU - The RKU was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.56) Romulan KRV - The YIS for this unit should be 172. MMSB-R4 states "The
Romulans converted one of their Klingon-type battlecruisers to this class in Y172 and another in Y175, but theoretically could have converted one Klingon-type battlecruiser [and two K4R escort frigates (R4.10)] as early as Y170." - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.56) Romulan KRV - This unit should have a Y2 note. MMSB-R4 states "The
Romulans converted one of their Klingon-type battlecruisers to this class in Y172 and another in Y175, but theoretically could have converted one Klingon-type battlecruiser [and two K4R escort frigates (R4.10)] as early as Y170." - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.33) Romulnan KRT - The BPV should be 137/128. The SSD shows to subtract 3 without Plasma-D rack. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.62) Romulan KFR - MSSB-R4 states the status is conjectural. Should this unit have both the UNV and CNJ notes? - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 48 - (R4.63A) Romulan K5L - MSSB-R4 shows this rule to be R4.63A. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (R4.10) Romulan K4B - Should not the ship type be "K4RB" as this is a K4R with a B-refit. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (R4.141) Romulan K4F - The R4F was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (YR4.2E) Romulan VUL+ - Based on the description in (R4.94) this should be a sub-light unit. All the information for this unit needs to verified. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Dec 2021.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 01, 2022 - 05:43 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (YR4.2D) Romulan VUL and VUL+ - There is a listing for the early year/sub-light versions of the Vulture on page 50. Should these listings be moved there to consolidate the entries? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (R4.30A) Romulan F-Pal - As the pallet can be used by multiple units, not just the Pioneer Eagle, could a group be created for the pallet so there is only a single entry? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (R4.132) Romulan HSE - The spare shuttles entry in the module R11 ship chart (page 60) is 1. Should not this also be 1? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 49 - (R4.2) Romulan WB+ - Should this unit have a "Same as Y3E" note, similar to the WB? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 50 - (R4.47) Romulan H+ - Should this unit have a "Same as Y4E" note, similar to the H-S? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 50 - (R4.7) Romulan WH - To follow convention the product where published should be "J/R4" and not "J+R4". - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.8A) Romulan SLKB - The Y2 SSD table (pg 37) shows this unit to have a YIS of 66. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.9A) Romulan SWBF - The Y2 SSD table (pg 38) shows this unit to have a YIS of 66. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.10A) Romulan SWBF - The Y2 SSD table (pg 39) shows this unit to have a YIS of 66. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.5D) Romulan SNS - Should the SNS listing be consolidated in either the Romulan Snipe And Variants group or the Romulan Early Years Snipe Frigate And Variants group? The goal is to only have one entry to update. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.11) Romulan FRT - Should this unit have the "No Cloak" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR1.3A) Romulan Civilian Bases - Should all of these units have the "No Cloak" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - (YR4.17) Romulan RHFM - Should not this augmentation module be in a Romulan Early Base Augmentation Modules group? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 51 - Romulan Early Fighter and Bomber Bases - All of these units were published in Y3. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 01, 2022 - 10:20 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.75) Kzinti DND - Per MSSB-R5 this unit could have been built in Y173 and should have a Y2 note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.101) Kzinti DLX - Per MSSB-R5 this is a fast unit and should have a "F" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.A2A) Kzinti ABC - MSSB-R5 lists this unit as conjectural and should have a "CNJ" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.A2) Kzinti EBC - MSSB-R5 lists this unit as conjectural and should have a "CNJ" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.116) Kzinti SRI - This unit was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 53 - (R5.116A) Kzinti SRIV - This unit was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.87) Kzinti NCD - This unit should have a YIS of 176 with a Y2 note that it could have been built in Y175. From R10 notes "R-section says first example in Y176, MSC says Y175. MSC should probably say Y176 with Y2 note. SVC decided to go with the first year the ships could have been built on the MSC for some reason that he has forgotten." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.90) Kzinti NDC - From the CL27 errata - MSC Year in service should be Y181. This unit should have a Y2 note that it could have been built in Y179. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.91) Kzinti NEC - From the R10 notes "SC should probably say Y179 with Y2 note. SVC decided to go with the first year the ships could have been built on the MSC for some reason that he has forgotten." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - Kzinti New Heavy Cruiser and Variants - Should not there be a note for this group "Regardless of the historical dates of these designs, any of them (excepting those iwth PFs) could have been built as early as Y175." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.86) Kzinti NCF - From R10 errata "MSC should probably say Y177 with Y2 note." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.214) Kzinti CLX - The CL37 SSD and MSSB-R5 show this rule to be 214 and not 210. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.214) Kzinti CLX - G3 shows a YIS of 186 without a double dagger symbol, while the SSD shows the YIS of 184 with a double dagger symbol. The Annex should probably be 184 with a double dagger. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.214) Kzinti CLX - The docking points should be updated to 8 to match the SSD (CL37, pg 99). - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.114) Kzinti HCM - The HCM was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.105) Kzinti CMM - By convention spare shuttles are a "-" when there are no spare shuttles and not zero. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.932) Kzinti MCM - Should the Medium Cruiser Mauler be listed in the Annex from Subspace News #4? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.A28) Kzinti MVH - This unit was published in the Star Fleet Battles: Kzinti SSD Pack #1 on page 9. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in the SSD pack. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 54 - (R5.120) Kzinti DDS - The DDS was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.44) Kzinti DW - From errata posted on the ADB web site (8/30/1998, errata30.htm) "DW, DWE, DWS, DWD command ratings 5." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.52) Kzinti DWD - From errata posted on the ADB web site (8/30/1998, errata30.htm) "DW, DWE, DWS, DWD command ratings 5." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.52) Kzinti DWE - From errata posted on the ADB web site (8/30/1998, errata30.htm) "DW, DWE, DWS, DWD command ratings 5." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 55 - (R5.49) Kzinti DWS - From errata posted on the ADB web site (8/30/1998, errata30.htm) "DW, DWE, DWS, DWD command ratings 5." - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 56 - (R5.119) Kzinti BFF - The BFF was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 56 - (R5.118A) Kzinti FKA - The FKA was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 56 - (R5.118) Kzinti FKE - The FKE was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 57 - (R5.103) Kzinti LCD - To match the convention used should not "only one" be "only one built?" - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 57 - (YR5.17) Kzinti P-YT5 - Per MSSB-R5 this pod is capable of landing using the gravity landing system and should have the "GL" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 57 - (YR5.3A) Kzinti WDI - Per MSSB-R5 the rule should be Y3A. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 57 - (YR5.3A) Kzinti WDI - Per MSSB-R5 the BPV should be 45. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 02, 2022 - 01:37 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 58 - (R6.63) Gorn DNE - The ship should have a Y2 notes as the ship description (R7, pg 13) indicates that there is a possibility this ship could have been built in Y160. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 58 - (R6.104) Gorn DNC - The DNC was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.105) Gorn DBC - The DBC was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.106) Gorn DDC - The DDC was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.76) Gorn CMV - The YIS for this unit should be 176 with a Y2 note. See MMSB-R6. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.208) Gorn HCDX - Should not this unit have a Y2 note, it could have been built in Y183 had it not died in committee. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.12) Gorn HDD - The explosion strength should be 15 per the AM 2014 SSD, pg 118. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 59 - (R6.12) Gorn HDD+ - The YIS for the HDD+ should be 175, from MSSB-R06 "installed beginning in Y175" - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 60 - (R6.A13) Gorn HVH - The HVH was published in CL53. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in CL53. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 60 - (R6.101) Gorn NHD - The NHD was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 61 - (R6.59) Gorn FLG - As this unit is authorized commando and heavy weapons squads, should it not have "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 61 - (R6.8) Gorn P-HB - The P-HB only has 17 crew units, three crew units are added by the plus refit. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 61 - (R6.41A) Gorn P-LBE - This unit should have a Y2 note per MSSB-R6, "It could (in theory) have been built earlier for the fleet tug". - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 61 - (R6.80) Gorn LCV - For consistency the note "2 built" should be "Only Two". - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 61 - (R6.82) Gorn LDE - For consistency the note "2 built" should be "Only Two". - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 62 - (YR6.18) Gorn P-YSL - Per MSSB-R6 this ship can land using the gravity landing system and should have a "GL" note. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 62 - (YR6.11A) Gorn - The ship designation should be WAL. See MSSB-R6. - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 62 - (YR6.13) Gorn WCG - Should not this ship have a "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 62 - (YR6.13A) Gorn WGL - Should not this ship have a "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 62 - Gorn Early Year Bases - To follow convention the rules should start with "YR" (e.g. YR1.1-6E) - Ken Kazinski, 1 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 02, 2022 - 11:19 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 63 - Tholian - The BB and SDS from CL28 are missing from the Annex. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - Tholian - (R7.A50) Tholian CAM - Should the cruiser mauler be listed in the annex. It was originally published the SFT #2. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - Tholian - R7.137 Tholian CVH - The CVH has errata for the MSSB-R7 and it was published in R4T as rule R7.137. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.50) Tholian CAN - Should not the produce where published be R10/R9? The rule is published in R9. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.51) Tholian CPN - Should not the produce where published be R10/R9? The rule is published in R9. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.27) Tholian CT - The crew units on the SSDs, M, pg 126 and M-2010, pg 126 show 48 crew units and the annex shows 46. The number of crew units should be 48. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.81) Tholian CWL - The CWL was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.211) Tholian CWPX - Should this unit have the "Only One Built" note? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.18) Tholian PR - Should this unit have a ML note as the ship cannot disengage by acceleration while carrying a pod? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 Notes - The CP note is missing from both G2 and G3. The note is G1. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 63 - (R7.17) Tholian TK5 - The "CAP" note should be "CP" per the notes section in G1. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - (R7.78) Tholian NTG - The SSD in R9, pg 47, Crawford box shows the YIS is 178 with an arbitrary note. Annex 3 should be updated to Y178. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - Tholian pods - All the pods should have a degree (when detached) symbol. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - (R7.55J) Tholian P-T - This is a troop transport pod, there are 38 crew units and 68 boarding parties. The crew units listing should be 38 and no passengers. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - (R7.60) Tholian NBB - The explosion strength should be 33+3+4, see R5, pg 46. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - (R7.76) Tholian NBS - The explosion strength should be 33+3+4, see R7, pg 16. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 65 - (R7.75) Tholian NBV - The YIS for this unit should be 186. the SCom command module has a YIS of 186, NBB collar has a YIS of 178 and the NBV battle carrier rear hull has a YIS of 179.- Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.82) Tholian NCH - The NCH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.205) Tholian NCX - The SSD X1, pg 56, shows the BPV to be 225 and not 240. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.205) Tholian NCX - Should the note be "Only Two" to match what has been used previously? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.79) Tholian NSR - The SSD, R9, Pg 48 shows the number of crew units is 45 and not 48. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.83) Tholian NCM - The NCM was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.71) Tholian NDD - Should this unit have the HG (Home Galaxy) note? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.84) Tholian NHD - The NDH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.85) Tholian NFH - The NFH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.73) Tholian LCM - Should not this unit have a HG (Home Galaxy) note? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.205A) Tholian CoM-X - MSSB-R7 pg 106 shows the rule number for the CoMX to be R7.220 - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.60) Tholian NBB Col - Should not the docking points be +2 and the explosion strength be +3? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.74) Tholian NHD Col - Should not the docking points be +1? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.82A) Tholian NCA/CL Col - The NCA/CL Col was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.84A) Tholian NDD/FF Col - The NDD/FF Col was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.75) Tholian NBV rear hull - There are no mech-links on the rear hull and this unit should not have a "P" note. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.82) Tholian NCH rear hull - The NCH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 66 - (R7.71) Tholian NDD rear hull - Should the NDD have the HG (Home Galaxy) note?. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 67 - (R7.85) Tholian NFH rear hull - The NFH was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 67 - (R7.78) Tholian NTG rear hull - The NTG rear hull YIS should be 178 to match that of the NTG. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, January 03, 2022 - 02:52 am: Edit

Annex 3 Notes - The CP note from G1 is missing from G3. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 68 - (R8.15) Orion OK6 - The "CAP" note should be "CP" to match the G1 notes. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 69 - (R8.18) Orion DWE - This unit is missing from the Annex. It is listed in the escort tables. There should be a listing for both the DWE and DWA. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 69 - (R8.14) Orion DBRE - This unit is missing from the Annex. It is listed in the escort tables. There should be a listing for both the DWE and DWA. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (R8.206) Orion FTX & BRX - Annex 3 lists both of these units with the same rule number. X1 goes from R8.201 to R8.205, X1R goes from R8.206 to R8.209. R8.206 is the Advanced Technology Battle Raider and not the FTX. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (R8.A1) Orion FLG - Should not the FLG have a "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.4) Orion YCR - The turn mode on the SSD is "A" and not "AA". - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.5) Orion YLR - Should this unit have a Y2 note? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.8) Orion YSL - The rule number should be Y8 and not Y9. See the Y2 SSD, pg 63. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.9) Orion VIK - The rule number should be Y9 and not Y10. See the Y2 SSD, pg 64. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.7) Orion YCA - The rule number should be Y7 and not Y8. See the Y2 SSD, pg 62. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

Annex 3 - Page 70 - (YR8.3A) Orion WDR - Should not the YIS for this unit be 100? - Ken Kazinski, 2 Jan 2021.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, January 03, 2022 - 06:52 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 72 - (R9.82) Hydran LGE - Module R7, pg 20, shows the command rating to be 10 and not 9. Posted on ADB web site, 6/28/2005 06:30:00, "The command rating differs from the F&E SIT. (G2 matches R7) Probably should be 9 as all other Light Dreadnoughts." but there was no confirmation that this should be done. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 72 - (R9.207) Hydran CAVX - The WSS is "LPT" and probably should be "LPW". - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 72 - (R9.68B) Hydran PIG - The PIG was given the rule number R9.68B) in MSSB-R9. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 72 - (R9.68B) Hydran PIG - Should not this unit have a "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 72 - (R9.97A) Hydran MSRV - The MSSB-R9 for R9.97A shows the ship type to be MSRV and not MRV. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 73 - Hydran DWH - The Hydran Geat White Hunter is missing from the Annex. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 74 - Hydran SRG - Should not the where published be M/R3. The unit rule was published in R3. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 74 - (R9.129) Hydran DWG - The DWG was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.125) Hydran PGC - The PGC was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.127) Hydran PGF - The PGF was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.126) Hydran PGG - The PGG was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.128) Hydran PGS - The PGS was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.90) Hydran PGV - The crew unis should be updated to 24, see SSD, J2, pg 56. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.18) Hydran D7H - The note section should be "CP" and not "CP, CAP". - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.A15) Hydran D7HX - The note section should be "CP" and not "CAP". - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.25) Hydran P-TT - The triangle should not be a solid triangle. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 75 - (R9.28) Hydran P-PF - The unit Product is listed as C1 and should be K. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 76 - (R9.119) Hydran P-SC - The ship type should be P-SC and not SP. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 76 - (R9.120) Hydran P-CR - The ship type should be P-CR and not VHP. This is reflected in both MSSB-R9 and the SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 76 - (R9.120) Hydran P-PT - The ship type should be P-PT and not PTP. This is reflected in both MSSB-R9 and the SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 76 - (R9.120) Hydran P-PT - The ship type should be P-PT and not PTP. This is reflected in both MSSB-R9 and the SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 76 - Should not the group "Hydran Warp Ships" be "Hydran Warp-Converted Ships"? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, January 04, 2022 - 12:28 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.T) Andromedan KRA - The ship type should TKC. All the Tournament SSDs show the Ship Type to be TKC. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.925) Andromedan PYX - Should not the where published be CL18/C3A? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.925) Andromedan PYX - Should not the rule be R10.925/RC10.25 or one or the other? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.925) Andromedan PYX - C3A changed the WSS to LPW with a CJ note. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.68) Andromedan CBR - The SSD, R11, pg 70 and the rule in R11, pg 32, show the ship type to be CBR and not CCR. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.22) Andromedan KIN - This unit should have the PL and LB note. From R10.22, "This ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.42)." - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.10) Andromedan BUL - This unit should have the PL. From R10.10, "This ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434)." - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 77 - (R10.20) Andromedan RAT - This unit should have the PL. From R10.20, "This ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434)." - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 78 - (R10.12) Andromedan PSS - Should not this unit have a ML note, as it cannot HET or perform EM? - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 78 - Andromedan Units - By convention if there are no crew units or boarding parties a zero is used and not a dash. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 78 - Andromedan Bases - By convention if a base can have augmentation modules or for the units docked internally, the explosion strength is normally listed as a number followed by a plus symbol, the BATS, BS, SAT and SB should all have a plus after the explosion strength. - Ken Kazinski, 3 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, January 05, 2022 - 01:07 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 80 - (R11.47) Lyran BB - The SSD in R5, pg 53 shows the BPV should be 336 and not 330. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 80 - (R11.48) Lyran CVA There should be a Y2 note as the unit could have been built earlier per R11.48. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 80 - (R11.104) Lyran SPS - This unit is missing from the annex. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 80 - (R11.206) Lyran BCX - This unit should have a P note. Per MSSB-R11, "PF tender: This ship is a true PF tender (K2.0)" - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 81 - (R11.95) Lyran NCV - This unit should have a Y2 note, due to the note "regardless of the historical dates of these designs, any of them (excepting those with PFs) could have been built as early as Y175.” - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 81 - Lyran New Heavy Cruiser and Variants - Should not there be a note "Note that regardless of the historical dates of these designs, any of them (excepting those with PFs) could have been built as early as Y175." - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 81 - Lyran New Heavy Cruiser and Variants - Should not there be a note "All NCA variants have one standard UIM except for those with no disruptors."? - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 81 - (R11.61) Lyran JGP - For consistancy the note should be "Only Two". - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 81 - (R11.103) Lyran HCW - The HCW was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.105) Lyran DWG - The DWG was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.107) Lyran HDD - The HDD was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.107) Lyran HDD - Module R12, pg 63, shows the WSS to be RP2 and a Y1 note. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.60) Lyran FLG - Should not this unit have a "T" note? - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.60) Lyran FLG - The BPV should be 74/58. The expanding sphere generator capacitor refit was installed in Y167; without this refit the ship’s BPV is reduced by one point. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.60) Lyran FLG - The plus refit was standard in Y167. The YIS for the FLG+ is Y167. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 82 - (R11.108) Lyran HFF - The HFF was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 83 - (R11.54) Lyran TSC - As this refers to the Cougar Fleet Tug (R11.16) and the Pal-SCS (R11.54) should not the rule be 16/54? - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 83 - (R11.54) Lyran Pal-SCS - The ship type should be Pal-SCS as the next line has the scout pallet (Pal-SC). - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 84 - (YR11.5) Lyran YFF - The BPV on the SSD in Y1, pg 70, is 50, but the BPV in the annex 40. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 08, 2022 - 05:28 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 100 - The notes section is missing the "PUR" note. This probably should be a copy from the WSS section. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.209) Wyn OBX - There is no "OP3" warship status in the notes section. The notes section needs the OP3 explanation, or this unit should have one of the status' in the notes. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.209) Wyn OBX - Should not this unit have the N1 note, "These ships were built by the Orions (R12.14), but do NOT have engine doubling (G15.28) or suicide bombs (G15.8); they do have stealth." The SSD also states has similar text. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.A3) Wyn OFB - Based on the ship rule, should not this ship should have a Y1 note? - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.A3) Wyn OFB - Should not this unit have the N1 note, "These ships were built by the Orions (R12.14), but do NOT have engine doubling (G15.28) or suicide bombs (G15.8); they do have stealth." The SSD also states has similar text. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.A2) Wyn OFC - Should not this unit have the N1 note, "These ships were built by the Orions (R12.14), but do NOT have engine doubling (G15.28) or suicide bombs (G15.8); they do have stealth." The SSD also states has similar text. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.203) Wyn OCRX - By convention when two where published products are listed there is a slash between them and not plus, "C3/X1". - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - The heading "Wyn Ships Received From Other Races" should be changed to "Wyn Ships Received From Other Empires" to match the convention of change race to empire. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - All Wyn entries, "CAP" notes should be "CP" to match the notes section. See G1, page 77. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 85 - (R12.A7) Wyn SDD - The breakdown should probably be "4-6" and not "F-6." - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 86 - (R12.205) Wyn ABX - The ship type should be "ABX" and not AxBCX. Both the SSD and rule in X1R show the ship type to be ABX. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 86 - (R12.206) Wyn CAX - The convention that has been used, in the Federation and Klingon sections, is to list only the 200 series rules and not both the original rule and the 200 series rule (e.g. R2.55 & R2.201). The rule should be just 206, if both rules should be listed than the previous sections will need to be updated. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 86 - (R12.51) Wyn DCS - The ship type should be DCS and not DSC. The rule and SSD in R11 show the ship type to be DCS. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 86 - (R12.205) Wyn DDX - The convention that has been used, in the Federation and Klingon sections, is to list only the 200 series rules and not both the original rule and the 200 series rule (e.g. R2.55 & R2.201). The rule should be just 205, if both rules should be listed than the previous sections will need to be updated. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 87 - (R12.207) Wyn FFX - The FFX is missing from the Annex. Information can be found in Module X1R. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 08, 2022 - 08:54 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 88 - (R13.54) ISC DNH - The master ship chart in R7 (pg 28) shows the YIS to be 192, but Annex 3 shows 193. Should not the YIS be 192? - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 89 - (R13.213) ISC PFTX - The master ship chart in X1R (pg 72) shows the WSS to be LP2, but Annex 3 shows LPT. There is no LPT in the WSS notes (G3, pg 111). Should not the WSS should be LP2. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 91 - (R13.22) + (R13.25) ISC BT - By convention when two where published products are listed there is a slash between them and not plus, "C2/R4". - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 08, 2022 - 11:08 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.3) LDR CA - The year in service should be 145 as this ship is part of the original fleet (C3, pg 24). - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.3) LDR CC - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 2 points to 156. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.201) LDR CCX: The BPV of this unit was not updated, it should be 252. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.4) LDR CL- The year in service should be 145 as this ship is part of the original fleet (C3, pg 24). - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.4) LDR CL - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 2 points to 123. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.7) LDR CWS - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 2 points to 141/111. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.11) LDR DD- The year in service should be 145 as this ship is part of the original fleet (C3, pg 24). - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.23) LDR DD - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 1 point to 90. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.23) LDR SC - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 1 point to 109/69. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 93 - (R14.12) LDR SC - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 2 points to 97. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R14.13) LDR FF- The year in service should be 145 as this ship is part of the original fleet (C3, pg 24). - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R14.13) LDR FF - The BPV should not include the ESG capacitor refit, reducing the BPV by 1 point to 72. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R14.44) LDR FP - The size class on the SSD (R9, pg 77) is 3, but the annex is showing 4. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R14.18) LDR POL- The year in service should be 145 as this ship is part of the original fleet (C3, pg 24). - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R14.20) LDR Mon - The BPV of just the monitor is 70/130. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R1.2-R14) LDR BATS - The rule should be updated to (R1.2-14) to reflect the change made by MSSB-R14. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R1.2-R14) LDR BATS - The note "See also R1.2" should be removed as the rule in MSSB-R14 explains the rule was changed. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 94 - (R1.35-R14) LDR BSC - The BPV on the SSD, C3, pg 79, shows 120/90, but Annex 3 shows 100. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 01:14 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 95 - (R15.13) Seltorian HVS - Should not this unit have a ML note as the amount of warp power applied to movement cannot be increased by more than 6 points during any given period of 32 consecutive impulse or perform HETs or EM? - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 95 - (R15.26) Seltorian HST - Should not this unit have a ML note as it cannot HET or perform EM? - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 95 -(R15.25) Seltorian DNL - Module R7 (pg 32) shows the explosion strength to be 33, but G3 has 25. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 95 -(R15.20) Seltorian CVS - "((HG:IMP)" should be "(HG:IMP)". - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 95 -(R15.20) Seltorian CLS - This unit should have a Y2 note. R15.A4 states "and the ship might have been built at any time (for this reason the note about the pre-Y184 non-use of various systems is retained on the SSD)" - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 96 - (R15.16) Seltorian SB - Should the rule be updated to R1.1-15 so when the MSSB-R15 comes out we will not have to make a change? - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 96 - (R15.-) Seltorian CAP - The penal ships from CL 19 are missing from the annex. - Ken Kazinski, 8 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 01:39 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 96 - (R15.A1) Seltorian LTT - The LTT SSD has a rule of R15.A1, the G3 annex shows the rule to be A2. CL25 has the DCS using rule R15.A1 also but it was published as R15.36 in R11. Should not the LTT be R15.A1? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 96 - (R15.A2) Seltorian P-B4 - The battle pod SSD (CL25, pg 64) shows the rule to be A2, but G3 shows the rule to be A3. The P-B4 should have a rule of A2. R15.A2 is also used by captured units Com, and NAT in CL26 (pg 63). I believe these units should be different rule numbers, possibly A4. The Seltorian CTD (CL26, pg 64) is rule R15.A3. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 02:08 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 98 - (R1.208Q) Jindarian GBDX-MG - This advanced technology base from X1R is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 98 - (R1.208P) Jindarian GBDX-RG - This advanced technology base from X1R is missing. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 12:36 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 99 - (R17.A1) Vudar CC - The rule (R17.37) is for the DCS (R11, pg 43). The CC was published in CL32 (rule pg 95, SSD pg 99). The where published should be CL32 and the rule should be A1. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 99- (R17.8) Vudar CVS - From CL39 Suppliment - Vudar CVS: The "Y" in the Notes Column should have been a "Y1". This unit should have a Y1 note. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 99 - (R17.A5) Vudar SR - The rule (R17.38) is for the DWP (R11, pg 43). The SR was published in CL32 (rule pg 95, SSD pg 103). The where published should be CL32 and the rule should be A5. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 99 - (R17.2) Vudar CL - The YIS for this unit should be 146. Per F2, R17.2 "The first ship entered service in Y146..." - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 100 - (R17.3) Vudar DD - Should not this unit have a Y2 note. From (R17.3), "In Y127, the Klingon Empire authorized the Vudar to construct a ship of this class as part of its local defense forces" the ship was authorized but not built until Y130. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 100 - (R17.48) Vudar FCR - The FCR was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 100 - (R17.33) Vudar ISS - Should the ISS be in the Ground Bases section? This way it would be listed with the other medium and small ground bases. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 06:54 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR18.3A) Paravian SCL - This unit from Y1 is missing from the Annex. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR18.4) Paravian ODD - This unit from Y1 is missing from the Annex. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR18.5) Paravian OFF - This unit from Y1 is missing from the Annex. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR1.1-18A) Paravian S-NST - The rule number for this unit should be YR1.1-18A and not YR1.1-19A. R19 is for the Carnivon's. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR1.1-18B) Paravian W-NST - The rule number for this unit should be YR1.1-18B and not YR1.1-19B. R19 is for the Carnivon's. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR1.1-18C) Paravian Y-NST - The rule number for this unit should be YR1.1-18C and not YR1.1-19C. R19 is for the Carnivon's. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR1.1-18C) Paravian Y-NST - By convention when two products are listed, the products are separated by a slash. "Y1-Y2" should be "Y1/Y2". - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - (YR1.3-18C) Paravian Y-AER - The where published should be Y1 and Y3 and not Y1 and Y2. Also, by convention when two products are listed, the products are separated by a slash. "Y1-Y2" should be "Y1/Y3". - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 101 - CL38 bases. The bases were published in Y3 and the data from Y3 should be used. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 08:48 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 102 - (YR19.15) Carnivon P-YC - The P-YC was published in both Y2 and Y3. Should it have a where published of "Y2/Y3"? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 09, 2022 - 11:14 pm: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 103 - (R51.38) Frax CWS - This question has been asked before is the BPV correct 110/130 or should it be 130/110? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 103 - Frax Tugs and Pods - The tugs and pods are missing from the annexes. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, January 10, 2022 - 12:26 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 107 - (R55.8) Barbarian Horde CAT - This unit is missing from the Annex. Originally published in SFT #10. This is a promised unit from C4. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 107 - (R55.9) Barbarian Horde DDT - This unit is missing from the Annex. Originally published in SFT #10. This is a promised unit from C4. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, January 10, 2022 - 01:01 am: Edit

Annex 3 - Page 107 - Flivver - Should not the units from SFT #12 be included? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Pae 108 - Deltan - Should not the CWS from SFT #7 be included? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.14) Canadi'en MCV - The where published should list the star letter number. This unit is also in SFT #14. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.12) Canadi'en CWE - The where published should list the star letter number. This unit is also in SFT #14. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.12A) Canadi'en CWA - The where published should list the star letter number. This unit is also in SFT #14. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.12A) Canadi'en CWA - Normally the aegis version does not have a "R" note, should this unit have an "R" note? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.11) Canadi'en DWE - The where published should list the star letter number. This unit is also in SFT #14. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.11A) Canadi'en DWA - The where published should list the star letter number. This unit is also in SFT #14. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - (R59.11A) Canadi'en DWA - Normally the aegis version does not have a "R" note, should this unit have an "R" note? - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

Annex 3 - Page 109 - Canadi'en - There is a PDF with all the general units for the Canadi'ens. These units should be part of the Annexes. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, January 12, 2022 - 10:24 am: Edit

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R1.50) Generic HTG - Should not this be listed as General HTG? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R1.50) General HTG - The movement cost with no post is 0.25 C. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R1.49) Generic STG - Should not this be listed as General STG? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R1.49) General STG - The movement cost with no post is 0.33 D. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R2.8) Federation Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R6.28) Gorn HDT - Should not the HDT be listed? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R6.5) Gorn Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R9.20) Hydran Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R13.22) ISC Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R11.937) Lyran MTT - Should the Lyran MTT from CL21 be listed? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R8.52) Orion Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R4.31) Romulan SPH - The SPH's 0-Pod entry should be 0.67 B. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R15.34) Seltorian Tug - TG should be Tug to match the rule and SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - (R7.78) Neo-Tholian NTG - TG should be NTG to match the rule and SSD. Also, should not Neo-Tholian just be Tholian? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Jan 2022

Annex 3A - Page 111 - Should the list be in alphabetical order or the same as other annexes where it is in the R-rules order (e.g. Federation, Klingon, Romulan, etc.)? - Ken Kazinski, 12 Jan 2022

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, January 13, 2022 - 03:31 am: Edit

Annex 3B - Page 113 - (R2.PF5) Federation PFF - This was listed on the BBS, 4/11/2011 00:17:26, The rule number listing for the Federation Fi-Con PF is listed as R1.PF5 and should just be PF5 as there is a R2 specific rule. MSSB-R2 shows the rule to be R2.PF5. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 113 - (R1.PF8.R2) Federation PFQ - The PFQ was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - All Pages - Should the Stellar Shadows PFs be listed in G3, they were published before G3 was. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, January 15, 2022 - 03:05 pm: Edit

Annex 3B - Page 113 - (R3.PF6) Klingon G1N - Per the web post on 4/10/2011 23:32:16, "Ther Crew Units should include the passengers in R3.PF6 (4 + 1)." - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 113 - (R1.PF8-R3) Klingon G1Q - The G1Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 113 - (R1.PF9-R3) Klingon G1R - The G1R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R1.PF8-R4) Romulan CEN-Q The CEN-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R1.PF9-R4) Romulan CEN-R The CEN-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R1.PF9-R4) Romulan CEN-R The CEN-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R4.PF2-8) Romulan STH-Q The STH-Q was published in CL52. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in CL52. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R4.PF2-9) Romulan STH-R The STH-R was published in CL52. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in CL52. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 114 - (R1.PF8-R5) Kznti PF-Q - The PF-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R1.PF9-R5) Kznti PF-R - The PF-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R5.PF3) Kznti Fi-Con-L - Per the SSD, Module K, Pg 13, the Fi-Con-L has 2 boarding parting and not 1. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R5.PF2) Kzinti MRN-LB - The SSD, Module K page 28, shows the designation to be LB and not just L. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R5.PF2) Kzinti MRN-LB - The BPV should be the 50/57 and not (+20). - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R1.PF8-R6) Gorn Pter-Q - The Pter-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 115 - (R1.PF9-R6) Gorn Pter-R - The Pter-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R7.PF1) Tholian AR - The ship type should be AR to match MSSB-R7. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF8-R7) Tholian Ar-Q - The Ar-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF9-R7) Tholian Ar-R - The Ar-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF8-R8) Orion BUC-Q - The BUC-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF9-R7) Orion BUC-R - The BUC-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF8-R9) Hyrdran HAR-Q - The HAR-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 116 - (R1.PF9-R7) Hyrdran HAR-R - The HAR-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 117 - (R1.PF8-R11) Lyran Bob-Q - The Bob-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 117 - (R1.PF9-R11) Lyran Bob-R - The Bob-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 117 - (R1.PF5-R12) Wyn PF-F - To follow convention the rule number should be R1.PF5. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 117 - (R1.PF8-R12) Wyn PF-Q - The PF-Q was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 117 - (R1.PF9-R11) Wyn PF-R - The PF-R was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R14.PF3) LDR Bob-P - The rule number should be PF3 to match MSSB-R14 R14.PF3) BOBCAT-P (a.k.a. BOBTAIL) PF (BOB-P). - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF8-R14) LDR Bob-Q - The Lyran Bob-Q was published in R12. Should all the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF9-R14) LDR Bob-R - The Lyran Bob-R was published in R12. Should all the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF8-R15) Seltorian PFQ - The PFQ was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF9-R15) Seltorian PFR - The PFR was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R3.PF3-R15) Seltorian G1P - The Seltorians used G1P should these be listed in the Annex? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R3.PF2-R15) Seltorian G1S - The Seltorians used G1P should these be listed in the Annex? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.