Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF8-R16) Jindarian PFQ - The PFQ was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R1.PF9-R16) Jindarian PFR - The PFR was published in R12. All the information should be updated to reflect the information in R12. - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R3.PF1-R17) Vudar G1 - Per R17.PF0 he Vudar were producing G1s, should they be on the Annex? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

Annex 3B - Page 118 - (R3.PF0-R17) Vudar H1 - Per R17.PF0 he Vudar were producing H1s, should they be on the Annex? - Ken Kazinski, 15 Jan 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, February 21, 2022 - 12:13 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6B - This unit rule should be F12, it is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6BM - This unit rule should be F12 as the A-6B is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6D - This unit rule should be F12, it is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6DM - This unit rule should be F12 as the A-6D is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation EA-6B - This unit rule should be F12E, it is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB but by convention EW fighters normally have an "E" added to the end of the rule. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation EA-6BM - This unit rule should be F12E as the EA-6B is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB but by convention EW fighters normally have an "E" added to the end of the rule. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6F - This unit rule should be F12, it is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation A-6FM - This unit rule should be F12 as the A-6F is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation EA-6C - This unit rule should be F12E, it is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB but by convention EW fighters normally have an "E" added to the end of the rule. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12) Federation EA-6CM - This unit rule should be F12E as the EA-6C is listed under R2.F12 in the Federation MSSB but by convention EW fighters normally have an "E" added to the end of the rule. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, February 21, 2022 - 08:06 am: Edit

Annex 4 - General question on pod rails. The pod rails are not listed in Annex 4 for most units but are in the unit descriptions. Should the pod rails be listed in the other weapons section? - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA12) Federation B-3 - The B-3 rule should be FA12. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 98. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA1) Federation B-17 - The B-17 rule should be FA1. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 93. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA4) Federation B-24 - The B-24 rule should be FA4. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 94. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA2) Federation B-25 - The B-25 rule should be FA2. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 94. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA5) Federation B-26 - The B-26 rule should be FA5. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 94. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Feb 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, March 23, 2022 - 11:00 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA4) Federation B-24 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA4) Federation B-24 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit retained 2/3's of the HFS's cargo capacity, which is 75 points. Should there be a other weapons entry of "Cargo (50 points)"? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA2) Federation B-25 - Per the Federation MSSB, when the bomber kit was installed on this unit, it is too large to fit in a double space shuttle bay. Should not the size of this unit be 3 and not 2? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA2) Federation B-25 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 2 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "2xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA5) Federation B-26 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 2 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "2xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA3) Federation B-29 - The B-29 rule should be FA3. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 94. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA3) Federation B-29 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA6) Federation B-32 - The B-32 rule should be FA6. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 95. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA6) Federation B-32 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA6) Federation B-32 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit retained 2/3's of the VFS's cargo capacity, which is 100 points. Should there be a other weapons entry of "Cargo (66.6 points)"? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA7) Federation B-36 - The B-36 rule should be FA7. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 95. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA7) Federation B-36 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA7) Federation B-36M - This unit should have one chaff pack. Per the MSSB-R02 description, if the unit had remained in service, the megafighter pack and chaff refit would be applied. - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA8) Federation B-47 - The B-47 rule should be FA8. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 96. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA8) Federation B-47 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - Should not the product where published be J2/CL31? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/BM - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 23 March 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, March 24, 2022 - 08:38 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 122 & 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52 - The B-52 rule should be F15. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 89. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 & 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52 - Should not the product for the B-52's be J2/CL31? - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/BM - This unit should only have 1 chaff pack. Per (J16.249) Megafighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers, they only increase speed and add two damage points. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52C - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52CM - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52CM - This unit should only have 1 chaff pack. Per (J16.249) Megafighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers, they only increase speed and add two damage points. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52D - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52DM - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52DM
- The YIS for this unit should be Y179. Per (J16.11) DEPLOYMENT: ... (Exceptions: the Federation deployed megafighter technology independently of developing interceptors in Y179;" - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52G - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit "replaced the two type-VI drone rails with standard type-I rails." The drone entry should only be "8xI". - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA9) Federation B-57 - The B-57 rule should be FA9. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 96. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA9) Federation B-57 - This unit should only have 1 chaff pack. Per (J16.249) Megafighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers, they only increase speed and add two damage points. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA9) Federation B-57 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA10) Federation B-58 - The B-58 rule should be FA10. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 97. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA10) Federation B-58 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA10) Federation B-58M - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA10) Federation B-58M - This unit should only have 1 chaff pack. Per (J16.249) Megafighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers, they only increase speed and add two damage points. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA11) Federation B-70 - The B-58 rule should be FA11. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 97. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA11) Federation B-70 - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA11) Federation B-70M - Per the Federation MSSB, this unit has 4 (J11.11) pod rails, should there be a "4xPod Rails (J11.11)" entry in other weapons? - Ken Kazinski 24 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, March 24, 2022 - 10:52 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F191) Federation E-3A - Should not the rule be F3A as rule R2.F191 discusses getting automatically receiving advanced SWACs and their victory determination value? - Ken Kazinski, 24 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, March 25, 2022 - 05:50 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F20 or R2.FA14) Federation F-101 Series - Annex 4 shows the rule number to be F20, but the Federation MSSB has a rule number of F20. Captain's Log #35 and Module G3 list the rule as F20. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.FA13) Federation F-104 Series - The F-104 rule should be FA13. It is listed in the Federation MSSB page 99. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.FA13) Federation F-104 Electronic Warfare fighters - Should the product be MSSB-R02? These fighters were not listed CL29 but are listed in the Federation MSSB page 99. - Ken Kazinski, 23 March 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 10:05 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.FA13) Federation F-104SE - The F-104S has 6xI and 2xVI drones. For the purposes of R1.F7, the EW fighter starts as a drone fighter. There should be 4xI, 2xVI and 2 EW Pods as R1.F7 replaces two of the type-I drones with EW Pods. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.F11) Federation F-111M - The BPV should be 19 x 1.5 or 28.5 and not 27.5. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 11:41 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.F1) Federation F-14D - The Federation MSSB (page 83) states "but each pair of special rails could carry one type-IV drone." This would indicate the double arrow symbol should be on the special rails and not the Type-I rails. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Mar 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.F1) Federation F-14DM - The Federation MSSB (page 83) states "but each pair of special rails could carry one type-IV drone." This would indicate the double arrow symbol should be on the special rails and not the Type-I rails. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 27, 2022 - 10:19 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 125 - (R2.F4E) Federation F-16EM - Per (J16.245) EW megafighters add 2xExtra Pod Rails. - Ken Kazinski, 27 Mar 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, April 03, 2022 - 10:24 am: Edit

Page 172 - Symbols on Fighter SSDs - There is no symbol for the Type-IV drones (Heavy Drone Rail), filled black triangle with a single white line. See the Klingon MSSB, page 116, for an example. - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - Klingon Fighters - General note, should not all the disruptor listing have the number of charges? There are some fighters with 1 charge, most have 2 and some with 3. - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA1) Klingon Z-1D - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA1. - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA1) Klingon Z-1D - The disruptor entry should be "1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges." - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA1) Klingon Z-1DM - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA1. - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA1) Klingon Z-1DM - The disruptor entry should be "1xDisr-FA, 3 Charges." - Ken Kazinski 2 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA1) Klingon Z-1DM - Per (J16.22) the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduce by two points, but not less than zero. The shuttles dogfight rating is 1 and should be 0. - Ken Kazinski, 2 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, April 04, 2022 - 01:26 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA2) Klingon Z-1R - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA2. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA2) Klingon Z-1RM - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA2. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA5) Klingon Z-1V - The Klingon MSSB (page 117) shows the rule for this unit to be FA5. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA5) Klingon Z-1VM - The Klingon MSSB (page 117) shows the rule for this unit to be FA5. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA3) Klingon Z-1S - The second Z-1M entry should be Z-1S, per the Klingon MSSB. Note: This fighter was originally called the Z-1M, but that designation was confused with a standard Z-1 fitted with a mega-pack and so has been changed to Z-1S. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA3) Klingon Z-1S - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA3. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA3) Klingon Z-1SM - The Z-1MM entry should be Z-1SM, per the Klingon MSSB. Note: This fighter was originally called the Z-1M, but that designation was confused with a standard Z-1 fitted with a mega-pack and so has been changed to Z-1S. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA3) Klingon Z-1SM - The Klingon MSSB (page 116) shows the rule for this unit to be FA3. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA6) Klingon Z-1Y - The Klingon MSSB (page 117) shows the rule for this unit to be FA6. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 - (R3.FA6) Klingon Z-1YM - The Klingon MSSB (page 117) shows the rule for this unit to be FA6. - Ken Kazinski 3 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, April 04, 2022 - 06:49 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 126 (R3.FA8) Klingon Z-3 - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA8. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 (R3.FA8) Klingon Z-3M - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA8. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 (R3.FA8E) Klingon Z-3E - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA8E. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 (R3.FA8E) Klingon Z-3EM - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA8E. - Ken Kazinski, 4 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 126 (R3.FA8E) Klingon Z-3EM - The YIS for this unit should be Y177 see (J16.0). - Ken Kazinski, 4 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, April 09, 2022 - 03:56 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4 - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA9. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4M - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA9. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4M - The dogfight rating should be 0. Per (J16.22), the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduced by two points, but not less than zero. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4E - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA9. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4EM - The Klingon MSSB (page 118) shows the rule for this unit to be FA9. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA9) Klingon Z-4EM - The dogfight rating should be 0. Per (J16.22), the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduced by two points, but not less than zero. - Ken Kazinski, 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F9) Klingon Z-B1 - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F9) Klingon Z-B1 - Per the Klingon MSSB (pg 114), "Z-B1 medium bombers always had one chaff pack from Y168." G3 shows this unit to have two chaff packs, the star symbol be removed. - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F9) Klingon Z-B1M - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F9) Klingon Z-B1M - Per the Klingon MSSB (pg 114), "Z-B1 medium bombers always had one chaff pack from Y168." G3 shows this unit to have two chaff packs, the star symbol should be removed. - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F10) Klingon Z-B2 - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F10) Klingon Z-B2 - Per the Klingon MSSB (pg 114), "Z-B2 medium bombers always had one chaff pack from Y168." G3 shows this unit to have two chaff packs, the star symbol should be removed. - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F10) Klingon Z-B2M - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F10) Klingon Z-B2M - The BPV should be "43.5" and not "43./5". - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F10) Klingon Z-B2M - Per the Klingon MSSB (pg 114), "Z-B1 medium bombers always had one chaff pack from Y168." G3 shows this unit to have two chaff packs, the star symbol should be removed. - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F11) Klingon Z-B3 - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F11) Klingon Z-B3M - Should not the disruptor entry should be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F11) Klingon Z-B4 - Should not the disruptor entry should be "3xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F11) Klingon Z-B4M - Should not the disruptor entry should be "3xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F5) Klingon Z-D - Should not the disruptor entry should be "1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 9 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, April 10, 2022 - 01:10 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.FA19) Klingon Z-De - Should not the disruptor entry be "1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA19) Klingon Z-De - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) shows the rule for this unit to be FA19. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.F5E) Klingon Z-DE - There are two fighter types with the designation Z-DE. The electronic warefare version of the Z-D and the upgraded engine Z-D fighter, (R3.FA19) Z-De. Having the types be different by capitalization leads to confusion (at least in my opinion). There are over 50 references in the Klingon MSSB to Z-De, so I don't think the Z-De would be changed. I would propose changing the Z-D EW fighter's type to something that is unique, maybe Z-DEW and the megafighter would be Z-DEWM in Annex 4, which is a smaller change. If adopted, a note should be added to the (R3.F5) Z-D rule that the type for the Z-D's EW fighter variant is Z-DEW. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA19C) Klingon Z-DeC - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) states there is a C-refit for the fighter, but there is no entry in Annex 4. By convention, C-refitted fighters have an entry in Annex 4. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA19C) Klingon Z-DeCM - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) states there is a C-refit and megafighter pack were created for this fighter, but there is no entry in Annex 4. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA17) Klingon Z-E - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) shows the rule for this unit to be FA17. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA17) Klingon Z-E - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA17) Klingon Z-EM - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) shows the rule for this unit to be FA17. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA17) Klingon Z-EM - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA21) Klingon Z-Ee - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA21. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA21) Klingon Z-Ee - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA21) Klingon Z-EeM - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA21. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA21) Klingon Z-EeM - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA18) Klingon Z-W - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) shows the rule for this unit to be FA18. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA18) Klingon Z-WM - When converting a fighter to a EW fighter (R1.F7), drone-armed fighters retain their Type-VI drone rails. As the the Z-W is a Z-E, the Z-E has two Tpe-VI rails, should not these rails have been retained? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA18) Klingon Z-W - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA18) Klingon Z-WM - The Klingon MSSB (page 121) shows the rule for this unit to be FA18. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 (R3.FA18) Klingon Z-WM - Should not the "4xADD" be "1xADD-4-360°" to be consistant with how the other Fighter Anti-Drone systems (ADD-6) are listed? - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, April 10, 2022 - 03:45 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F6C) Klingon Z-PC - The Klingon MSSB (page 113) shows the rule for this unit to be F6P. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.F6C) Klingon Z-PCM - The megafighter packs adds two Type-I drones, the drone listing should be "4xI" and not "2xI". - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.FA20) Klingon Z-Pe - The Klingon MSSB states this unit gets the C-Refit. The C-Refit replaces the two light (type-VI) drone rails with standard (type-I) drone rails, the drone listing should be "2xVI" and not "2xI". There should be a listing for the PeC.- Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 127 - (R3.FA20) Klingon Z-Pe - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA20. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA20) Klingon Z-PeM - The Klingon MSSB states this unit gets the C-Refit. The C-Refit replaces the two light (type-VI) drone rails with standard (type-I) drone rails. The megafighter pack addes two Type-I drones. The drone listing should be "2xI 2xVI" and not "4xI". There should be a listing for the PeCM. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA20) Klingon Z-PeM - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA20. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, April 10, 2022 - 09:54 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F7) Klingon Z-H - Should not the disruptor entry be "1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F8) Klingon Z-HB - Should not the disruptor entry be "1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges?" - Ken Kazinski 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA26) Klingon Z-K - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA26. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA26) Klingon Z-KM - The Klingon MSSB (page 122) shows the rule for this unit to be FA26. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA27) Klingon Z-KB - The Klingon MSSB (page 123) shows the rule for this unit to be FA27. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA27) Klingon Z-KBM - The Klingon MSSB (page 123) shows the rule for this unit to be FA27. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA12) Klingon Z-VB - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA12. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA12) Klingon Z-VBM - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA12. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA12) Klingon Z-R - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA11. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA12) Klingon Z-RM - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA11. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, April 11, 2022 - 11:46 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F4B) Klingon Z-YB - The Klingon MSSB (page 112) shows the rule for this unit to be F4B. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F4B) Klingon Z-YBM - The Klingon MSSB (page 112) shows the rule for this unit to be F4B. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F4C) Klingon Z-YC - The Klingon MSSB (page 112) shows the rule for this unit to be F4C. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.F4C) Klingon Z-YCM - The Klingon MSSB (page 112) shows the rule for this unit to be F4C. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA13) Klingon Z-YD - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA13. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA13) Klingon Z-YDM - The Klingon MSSB (page 119) shows the rule for this unit to be FA13. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 128 - (R3.FA15) Klingon Z-YP - The Klingon MSSB (page 120) shows the rule for this unit to be FA15. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R3.FA15) Klingon Z-YPM - The Klingon MSSB (page 120) shows the rule for this unit to be FA15. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R3.FA16) Klingon Z-G - The Klingon MSSB (page 120) shows the rule for this unit to be FA16. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R3.FA16) Klingon Z-GM - The Klingon MSSB (page 120) shows the rule for this unit to be FA16. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, April 12, 2022 - 01:05 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 121 - (XJ8.1) MRS-X - The product should be Z1 and not J2. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 121 - (YR1.F3) RS-Y - The BPV should be just "2" and not "2/1". By convention unless the economic BPV is not half the combat BPV it is not listed separately. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 121 - (YR1.F8) VFS-Y - The dogfight rating should be -1 and not 0 to match the VFS. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 121 - (YR1.F9) VIP-Y - The dogfight rating should be -1 and not 0 to match the VIP. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 10:51 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F14) Federation A-20FM - The product where published should be "J2," the same as the A-20F. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6B - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 88) the EA-6B is a a two-seat A-6B variant. The BPV for the EA-6B should be 12 (A-6B BPV, 10, plus 2 for two-seat version). - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6B - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 88) the EA-6B have four pod rails. Should not the drones entry be "4xPod Rail (J11.11)"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6B - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 88) the EA-6B have four pod rails and the maga-pack should add 2 extra pod rails. Should not the drones entry be "4xPod Rail (J11.11); 2 extra pod rails"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6BM - Per (J16.12) adding a megafighter system to a fighter costs 50% of the original fighter’s BPV. The shuttle's combat BPV is 16.5 and should be 18. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6B - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 88) the EA-6B have four pod rails. Should not the drones entry be "4xPod Rail (J11.11)"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F12E) Federation EA-6B - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 88) the EA-6B have four pod rails. Should not the drones entry be "4xPod Rail (J11.11)"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F18) Federation B-2 - Should not the product be "J2/CL36"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F18) Federation B-2M - Should not the product be "J2/CL36"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.FA7) Federation B-36 - The DFR should be -2 (with one chaff pack). By convention if a chaff pack was added in Y168, Annex 4 shows the number of chaff packs added. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - Should not the product be "J2/CL31"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 122 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52A/B - The DFR should be -1 (with one chaff pack). By convention if a chaff pack was added in Y168, Annex 4 shows the number of chaff packs added. If the B-52A/B was not supposed to get a chaff pack the Federation MSSB unit information should be updated. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52E - Should not the product be "CL31"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52G - The drone entry should be "8xI" and not "8xI, 2xVI". Per the Federation MSSB, page 90, "The G-model
replaced the two type-VI drone rails with standard type-I rails" - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F15) Federation B-52GM - The drone entry should be "8xI" and not "8xI, 2xVI". Per (J16.249) Megafighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers, they only increase speed and add two damage points. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA9) Federation B-57M - The Federation MSSB (page 96) shows the rule for this unit to be FA9. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA10) Federation B-58M - The Federation MSSB (page 97) shows the rule for this unit to be FA10. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA11) Federation B-70M - The Federation MSSB (page 97) shows the rule for this unit to be FA11. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F19) Federation E-2A SWAC - To match convention should not the designation be "E-2A SWAC"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.F191) Federation E-3A SWAC - To match convention should not the designation be "E-3A SWAC"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 123 - (R2.FA14) Federation F-101A - Per the Federation MSSB (pg 100) the F-101 have two pod rails. Should not the other weapon entry be "2xPod Rail (J11.111)"? - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 124 - (R2.FA13) Federation F-104JE - The rule for this unit should be MSSB-R2 as this unit is not list in CL29. - Ken Kazinski, 14 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, April 26, 2022 - 11:20 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F13) Romulan CH-3 - This unit only shows one chaff pack and per MSSB-R04, page 93, "Cohort-3s always had two chaff packs." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F13) Romulan CH-3M - This unit only shows one chaff pack and per MSSB-R04, page 93, "Cohort-3s always had two chaff packs." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F1) Romulan G-IM - Per (J16.22) the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduce by two points, but not less than zero. The shuttles dogfight rating is -1 and should be 0. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F1E) Romulan G-IE - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-IE" and not "G-I-E" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F1E) Romulan G-IE - The G-I would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F1E) Romulan G-IE - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-IE" and not "G-I-E" making the megafighter type "G-IEM." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F1E) Romulan G-IEM - The G-I would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. Per J16.245 no additional weapons would have been added. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F2E) Romulan G-IIE - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-IIE" and not "G-II-E" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F2E) Romulan G-IIE - The G-II would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F2E) Romulan G-IIEM - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-IIE" and not "G-II-E" making the megafighter type "G-IIEM." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F2E) Romulan G-IIEM - The G-II would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. Per J16.245 no additional weapons would have been added. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F3E) Romulan G-IIIE - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-IIIE" and not "G-III-E" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F3E) Romulan G-IIIE - The G-III would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 129 - (R4.F3E) Romulan G-IIIEM - The G-III would be considered an assault fighter per R1.F7. All non-phaser weapons should be deleted and no Plasma-K's added. The 2xPL-K should be removed. Per J16.245 no additional weapons would have been added. - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (R4.F5E) Romulan G-SFE - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-SFE" and not "G-SF-E" making the megafighter type "G-SFEM." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (R4.F5E) Romulan G-SFEM - The Rolmulan MSSB shows this unit's type to be "G-SFE", making the megafighter type "G-SFEM." - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (R4.F0) Romulan SLS - The sub-light shuttle is listed in Advanced Missions and Module J. Should not both products be listed in Annex 4? - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F3) Romulan GAS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF3" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F3) Romulan GAS-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF3" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F5) Romulan GBS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF5" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F5) Romulan GBS-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF5" - Ken Kazinski, 26 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, May 01, 2022 - 02:05 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F2A) Romulan GBS-Li - Per MSSB-R04, page 127, the rule should be "YF2A" - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F6) Romulan HAS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF6". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F8) Romulan HFS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF8". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F13) Romulan HRS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF13". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F4) Romulan HTS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF4". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F22) - Romulan LG-1 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F22) - Romulan LG-1 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF22". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F22) - Romulan LG-1 - Per the Legate sublight heavy fighters section "Legate heavy fighters had two rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "2xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F23) - Romulan LG-2 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F23) - Romulan LG-2 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF23". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F23) - Romulan LG-1 - Per the Legate sublight heavy fighters section "Legate heavy fighters had two rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "2xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F11) - Romulan LVP-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF11". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F11) - Romulan LVP-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF11". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F16) - Romulan MSL-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF16". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F16) - Romulan MSL-S - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See M9.18" be "See (M9.18)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F18) - Romulan MN-1 - Per the Maniple sublight bombers section "All variants of the Maniple bomber had four rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "4xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F18) - Romulan MN-1 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F18) - Romulan MN-1 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF18". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F19) - Romulan MN-2 - Per the Maniple sublight bombers section "All variants of the Maniple bomber had four rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "4xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F19) - Romulan MN-2 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F19) - Romulan MN-2 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF19". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F20) - Romulan MN-3 - Per the Maniple sublight bombers section "All variants of the Maniple bomber had four rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "4xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F20) - Romulan MN-3 - As this unit can receive EW from its base should not the "E-EW Pod" be "EW-Pod?" The Legate-2 (LG-2) shows an upgraded EW-Pod with the ability to receive EW support. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F20) - Romulan MN-3 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F20) - Romulan MN-3 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF20". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F21) - Romulan MN-4 - Per MSSB-R4, there are three plasma-F torpedoes. The other weapons section "2xPL-F-FA" should be "3xPL-F-FA" - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F21) - Romulan MN-4 - Per the Maniple sublight bombers section "All variants of the Maniple bomber had four rails to carry cluster bombs (E20.36)." Annex #4 in Y3 shows "4xBomb Rail". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F21) - Romulan MN-4 - Per MSSB-R4, there is only one chaff pack. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F21) - Romulan MN-4 - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F21) - Romulan MN-4 - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF21". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F24) - Romulan MRS-S - The unit was published in Y3. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F24) - Romulan MRS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF24". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F17) - Romulan MSL-S - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See M9.18" be "See (M8.3)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F17) - Romulan MRS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF17". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F7) - Romulan PROS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF7". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F7) - Romulan PROS-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF7". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F12) - Romulan RSh-S - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See R1.F22" be "See (R1.F22)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F12) - Romulan RSh-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF12". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F12) - Romulan RSh-Si - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See R1.F22" be "See (R1.F22)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F12) - Romulan RSh-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF12". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F15) - Romulan RS-S - The BPV should just be "2" and not "2/1." By convention when the ecomonic BPV is half the combat BPV it is not listed. - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F15) - Romulan RS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF15". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F14) - Romulan SVS-S - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See R1.F24" be "See (R1.F24)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F14) - Romulan SVS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF14". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F14) - Romulan SVS-Si - By convention the rule numbers are in parens, should not the other weapon "See R1.F24" be "See (R1.F24)"? - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 130 - (YR4.F14) - Romulan SVS-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF14". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (YR4.F9) - Romulan VFS-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF9". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (YR4.F10) - Romulan VIP-S - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF10". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (YR4.F10) - Romulan VIP-Si - By convention the empire number is not listed, the display rule should be "YF10". - Ken Kazinski, 30 Apr 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, May 02, 2022 - 08:32 am: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F11) Kzinti AMR - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F11) Kzinti AMR - There should only be one chaff pack for this bomber DFR should be "-1" and not "-1 star". - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F11) Kzinti AMRM - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F11) Kzinti AMRM - There should only be one chaff pack for this bomber DFR should be "-1" and not "-1 star". - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F1) Kzinti AS - There should be a Section Mark (§) symbol as this unit did not have any chaff packs. Per MSSB-R5, "Historically, attack shuttles never had chaff, having been removed from active service by the time chaff was developed in Y168. (Some may have still been in use in training squadrons, but this is doubtful.)" Other units state the chaff pack would have been added in Y168 in the unit description. - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F1) Kzinti ASM - Should there be a Section Mark (§) symbol as this unit did not have any chaff packs? Per (J16.0) chaff packs would not have been added. - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F10) Kzinti BMR - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F10) Kzinti BMRM - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 1 May 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 - 06:35 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F7C) Kzinti DASC - The MSSB-R05 shows the rule to be (R5.F7C) and not just (R5.F7). - Ken Kazinski, 02 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 131 - (R5.F7C) Kzinti DASCM - The MSSB-R05 shows the rule to be (R5.F7C) and not just (R5.F7). - Ken Kazinski, 02 May 2022.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 - 10:05 pm: Edit

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.F8) Kzinti LAS - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA1) Kzinti LKS - The Kzinti MSSB (Page 72) shows the rule for this unit to be FA1. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA1) Kzinti LKSM - Per (J16.22) the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduce by two points, but not less than zero. The shuttles dogfight rating is -1 and should be 0. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA1) Kzinti LKSM - The Kzinti MSSB (Page 72) shows the rule for this unit to be FA1. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA2) Kzinti LKF - The Kzinti MSSB (Page 72) shows the rule for this unit to be FA2. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA2) Kzinti LKF - Per (J16.22) the dogfight rating of a megafighter is reduce by two points, but not less than zero. The shuttles dogfight rating is -1 and should be 0. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.FA2) Kzinti LKF - The Kzinti MSSB (Page 72) shows the rule for this unit to be FA1. - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.

Annex 4 - Page 132 - (R5.F9) Kzinti LFS - Should not the "2xDisr-FA" be "2xDisr-FA, 2 Charges"? - Ken Kazinski, 4 May 2022.