Archive through November 19, 2025
Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board: Star Fleet Battles: Rules Questions: Questions on Ships: Archive through November 19, 2025
By Alan Trevor (Thyrm) on Wednesday, October 22, 2025 - 11:31 am: Edit

John,

I suspect that is, in fact, the intent. But I posted here anyway just so people would be aware of the contradiction. Note that the ship entries in Module G3 have a "War Ship Status" column. So if you look up the Fed BB, for example, you see that it has Status of "CNJ" (Conjectural). But the fighter entries have no "Status" so if you look up the S-IVM, you find statistics for it but have no way of knowing it didn't actually exist. The only way to know that would be to check the Tholian Master Starship Book.

By Frank Lemay (Princeton) on Wednesday, October 22, 2025 - 08:24 pm: Edit

Question re Fed IPL Y177,
In CL 24, the Bpv shows 50 CBpv but in G3, it indicates 65 CBpv.

Does anyone know which is the true CBpv ?

Thanks.

Cheers
Frank

By Jessica Orsini (Jessica_Orsini) on Thursday, October 23, 2025 - 07:06 am: Edit

Frank,

The base Federation POL was revised up to 50 BPV (many a long year ago), and Module G3 was published well after Captain's Log #24; Occam's Razor puts the IPL at 65 BPV.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, November 02, 2025 - 11:16 am: Edit

Frank,

SPP verified the IPL BPV is 65 on 2/13/2010 19:32:00

By Russ Simkins (Madcowak) on Sunday, November 09, 2025 - 06:37 pm: Edit

Small freighter "in ballast" (no pods, skids, ducktails, just control and engine) move cost?

Found a post that seemed to infer there is an SSD somewhere but I haven't found it. CL#23 has move cost of unpublished F-S + McCargo pods down to 1/5 so shouldn't be more than that.

By Frank Lemay (Princeton) on Sunday, November 09, 2025 - 10:11 pm: Edit

Jessica and Ken, thank you.

Cheers
Frank

By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar3) on Sunday, November 09, 2025 - 10:52 pm: Edit

Russ, That might be a good ballpark as a normal small freighter is 0.33, a harbor tug [(R1.50) one power skid] is 0.25. So with no skid, might be 0.2 (no official SSD).

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Monday, November 10, 2025 - 01:20 am: Edit

I have an SSD from the online Small Freighter In Ballast has a move cost of: 1/4.
Not 100% sure but I believe the SSD was posted in the online entry of one of the Starfleet Times or Starletters.

By Russ Simkins (Madcowak) on Monday, November 10, 2025 - 04:30 am: Edit

Rusman, you were right. Star Fleet Times #43 (1999) has a small freighter in ballast with ducktail. Move cost shown as 1/4. Issue came out between CL#18 and CL#19

CL#23 (2001) talks about F-S with 120 meter (15 cargo box) or 80 meter pod (10 cargo box) with 1/4 and 1/5 move costs respectively. Can't think of a good reason the rig would be faster with a small pod than no pod at all. Maybe the ducktail causes extra drag without the cargo pod wind deflector! :) Also mentions two intriguing data points: only 10% of F-S in Y165 have skids but that doesn't mean they don't become a fad in GW years. Also mentions engine upgrades:

Quote:

"At about the same time as the new commercial twin-engine drive modules, the so-called “Military” drive modules appeared. These had more power, and were more capable of maneuvers and long-distance travels. These were fairly rare creatures (mostly owned by governments) until much later, when the birth of auxiliaries during and after the Four Powers War spurred wider production and made them economical for civilian use. As time went by, more and more “civilian” freighters had these larger engines. At the end of the General War, some freighters had even larger engines (two five-box engines for the small freighter and two ninebox engines for the large freighter) which gave them the power to operate at maximum “combat” speeds and freed them from the limits imposed by commercial-grade engines."



I'll see if I can come up with a workable home-brew system for all these interesting combos.

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Monday, November 10, 2025 - 09:47 pm: Edit

Hey Russ, I sent you an Email that might be helpful for your freighter combinations.

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 06:47 am: Edit

Quote:

CL#23 (2001) talks about F-S with 120 meter (15 cargo box) or 80 meter pod (10 cargo box) with 1/4 and 1/5 move costs respectively. Can't think of a good reason the rig would be faster with a small pod than no pod at all. Maybe the ducktail causes extra drag without the cargo pod wind deflector!



With or without a skid, the F-S in ballast has a move cost of 1/4. one skid on an F-S does not add any to its movement cost. Same for two on an F-L. The fact that an F-S with a small ten box cargo pod has the same move cost is just a bonus for the ship. Its higher speed is the trade off for not hauling nearly as much cargo.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 09:32 am: Edit

If you consider the smaller cargo pods have/carry less mass, the movement cost would be less as the engine power would move the ship faster.

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 12:31 pm: Edit

Wait a minute. I just started going over this in closer detail and I think I see what the other Russ was talking about and it doesn't add up. Something somewhere is incorrect.

I also just dug out my CL#23 to re-read it for myself... "A small freighter with an 80m pod had a move cost of only 1/5 of an energy point per movement factor, while a small freighter with a 120m pod had a movement cost of 1/4 energy point per movement factor."

All three of my copies of (CL#23, R8 & R11) state that skids & ducktails do not increase the movement cost of the freighter. Though to be honest, I would assume an F-S carrying two or three skids SHOULD have a higher move cost and I feel this needs formal clarification either way.

The SSD from SFT#43 shows F-S in ballast with a movement cost of 1/4. I am not aware that the move cost of a pod-less freighter is formally stated anywhere else. So does a pod-less F-S have a move cost of 1/4, or 1/5 or 1/6 or what? This absolutely does need a formal answer to clear things up. Same goes for the F-L move cost and associated differences when carrying more than two skids or different pod sizes.

By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar3) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 08:33 pm: Edit

Thing is, for multi-pod freighters, the overall length must match (between the bridge and engine housings). For example, an FL with a 120 pod and 80 pod would need a 40 skid to balance out.

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 09:07 pm: Edit

Stewart, You are correct, but that is not what's in question. It's the move cost needing clarification.

By Russ Simkins (Madcowak) on Sunday, November 16, 2025 - 10:59 pm: Edit

Yes the issue is, as the most excellently named other Russ points out, move costs (particularly small Freighters) with the various cargo pods, engines, skids, ducktails, etc. There are undefined gaps in the rules for combinations.

Been working up a system that would handle all that but not yet finely tuned on some of the numbers. System must reinforce the defined rules/SSDs (i.e. F-S std engines with 25 box cargo can fit 1 skid + ducktail with no additional move cost but 2 skids with a 25 cargo is a no-go, no 4 skids even without cargo). Got something working but still too early in development to share as I dial in the numbers for the crazy number of possible combinations. Includes the discussed but never revealed improved engine packages and smaller pods from CL#23 article.
The move cost given in SFT#43 I don't give credence to since so much printed in SFT is bonkers like the F-S with twin 25box cargo pods.

Basically every component is given a two digit "mass effect" value. Not truly mass but their effect on move cost. Specific engines, control, skid, ducktail, various pods, etc each have a listed value. The sum value for the freighter is compared to a simple chart of the move cost for each range of "mass effect" summations. Sounds more complicated than it is but here is an example with the numbers I have for now.
F-S with std twin 2 box engines (11) + 1 skid (6) + ducktail (3) + cargo 25 (13) = 33
The chart is the decimal equivalents of move cost fractions 1/3=.33, 1/4=.25, 1/5=.20, 1/6=.16 without the decimal.
Mass effect rounds up so if you have 26 mass effect you have 1/3 move cost.
Can't go above 1/3 (33) as that is too taxing on engine design. That enforces limits on what combos you can assemble.
As far as skids & ducktails declaration they don't add to the move costs: Well that's true from a game perspective with the standard combos but they do have mass. It just doesn't effect the standard freighter layouts in terms of the current game. Start bumping up the engines (which have greater mass effect) and there are instances where that may not hold.

Anyway, don't want to over burden this thread with something that should go into its own proposal thread when it's ready for eval.

By Alan Trevor (Thyrm) on Tuesday, November 18, 2025 - 03:45 pm: Edit

Can a Fed CA/CC hull be converted to the CB "Heavy Command Cruiser". I seem to vaguely remember something, somewhere, suggesting that they could not, but I can't find a specific source. I checked the FEDERATION MASTER STARSHIP BOOK and I couldn't find anything that would definitively answer the question. But it did explicitly say that "The heavy command cruiser is a variant of the heavy cruiser (R2.4)." That would seem to indicate that a CA or CC could be converted to a CB.

So which is it, and what's the source of that information? More generally, which (if any) CAs/CCs can be converted to heavy command cruisers? In the KLINGON MASTER STARSHIP BOOK it states "The D7W heavy command cruiser (R3.88) and its variant the D7WD drone cruiser (R3.163) were built on drastically modified D7 battlecruisers and considered to be their own base hull." I can find no comparable statement in the FEDERATION MASTER STARSHIP BOOK that the CB is considered to be its "own base hull". One possible interpretation would be that a Fed CC could be converted to a CB, but a Klingon D7C/D7L could not be converted to a D7W. But that's certainly not the only interpretation, based on the wording I've found so far. So is their a definitive source on converting command cruisers to heavy command cruisers? If so, where?

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Tuesday, November 18, 2025 - 06:12 pm: Edit

In F&E, a Fed CA or CC can be converted to a CB and a D7 or D7C can be converted into a D7W (Tactical Operations SIT).

By Mike West (Mjwest) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 12:29 am: Edit

Regarding the freighters, "freighter in ballast" is the same thing as "freighter with no pods". As such, The best movement rate a small freighter with no pods should have is 1/4. It should not be 1/5 and we can chalk whatever was in SFT as playtest material that was eventually superseded.

So, at some point, the "load" on an F-S will drop the movement rate from 1/3 to 1/4. We know a full 50-box pod requires the 1/3 and that no pod gives 1/4. Where the middle is crossed would require some investigation to see what has been printed for various "mini-pods". But, no matter what, the movement rate should not be better than 1/4.

(The F-L would do the same thing, switching from 1/2 to 1/3 at some point with a light enough load.)

To be clear, this is just my opinion and any official decisions will have to be made by the Steves. But I really don't see any configuration of F-S moving faster than 1/4 when the published "F-S with no pods" has a 1/4 movement rate.

By Robert Russell Lender (Rusman) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 08:32 am: Edit

Mike,

That's sort of the problem.
Where is the officially "published" pod-less F-S (with a movement cost 1/4)?

The only "Published" SSD of it I've ever seen is in fact SFT#43. And the CL#23 article is the "published" rule reference stating the F-S with a short (10 box) cargo pod is movement cost 1/5. Both cannot be true. One of them must be incorrect

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 04:29 pm: Edit

Tell me where the "published" SSD is and I will compile this into a "blue paper" for Petrick to review the next time I see him, which might be Thursday, Friday, or Monday.

By Jessica Orsini (Jessica_Orsini) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 05:37 pm: Edit

The "published" SSD of a small freighter in ballast with a 1/4 Move Cost is on page six of Star Fleet Times #43; the description of a 1/5 Move Cost for a small freighter with a "short pod" is in the final paragraph of the "Development of the Standard Small Freighter" article, page 11 of Captain's Log #23.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 06:25 pm: Edit

I need something other than SFT if there is anything.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 09:07 pm: Edit

Here is a list of "Freighters"

UnitMove CostSSD Page
(R01.69A) General S-DT Small Freighter Ducktail0R08- 3/CL23 Pg- 11
(R01.69A2) General S-PT Small Freighter Power Pack Ducktail0R11- 3
(R01.69A3) General S-WT Small Freighter Workboat Ducktail0R11- 3
(R01.69B) General L-DT Large Freighter Ducktail0R08- 3
(R01.69B2) General L-PT Large Freighter Power Pack Ducktail0R11- 3
(R01.69B3) General L-WT Large Freighter Workboat Ducktail0R11- 3
(R01.5) General F-S + S-DT Small Freighter In Ballast With Ducktail0.25SFT43 Pg- 6
(R01.5) General F-S Small Freighter0.33BS-2011-SSD- 3/CL23 Pg- 10
(R01.5) General F-S (Base/Military Eng) Small Freighter W/Out Pods & Military Engines0.33BS-1999- 3
(R01.5) General F-S + GS + PC Small Freighter + General Skid + Cargo Pod0.33SFT43 Pg- 4
(R01.5) General F-S + 2xP-CC + S-DT Small Freighter Two Pod Configuration With Ducktail0.33SFT43 Pg- 8
(R01.5) General F-S (Base) Small Freighter W/Out Pods0.33BS-1999- 3
(R9910.5) Josers F-S Small Freighter0.33SFT18 Pg- 3
(R01.12A) General F-MS Small Mine-Laying Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 6/AM- 6
(R01.20) General F-AS - PL-D Small D-Rack-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 19/AM- 19
(R01.20) General F-AS - P2 Small Phaser-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 18/AM- 18
(R01.20) General F-AS - PL-F Small Plasma-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 19/AM- 19
(R01.20) General F-AS - Disr Small Disruptor-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 20/AM- 20
(R01.20) General F-AS - Drone Small Drone-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 17/AM- 17
(R01.20) General F-AS Small Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 17/AM- 17
(R04.20) Romulan F-AS - PL-F Small Plasma-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 19/AM- 19
(R06.20) Gorn F-AS - PL-F Small Plasma-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 19/AM- 19
(R49.20) Tholian HG F-AS - PC Small Particle Cannon Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 17/AM- 17
(R08.20) Orion F-AS - PL-F Small Plasma-Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 19/AM- 19
(R09.20) Hydran F-AS - Fus Small Fusion-Armed Freighter0.33C1-1994- 9
(R18.20) Paravian F-AS - QWT Small Quantum Wave Torpedo Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 20/C6 Pg- 26
(R502.20) Borak F-AS - P-C Small Phaser Cannon Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 17/AM- 17
(R9103.20) Indirigan F-PS Small Armed Freighter0.33AM-2014-SSD- 17/AM- 17
(R01.25A) General F-RS Small Repair Freighter0.33R01- 6
(R01.26A) General F-ES Small Exploration Freighter0.33R01- 8
(R01.36) General F-PS Small Prospecting Freighter0.33F1- 47
(R01.78) General SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R02.78) Federation SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R03.78) Klingon SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R04.78) Romulan SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R05.78) Kzinti SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R06.78) Gorn SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R07.78) Tholian SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R09.78) Hydran SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R11.78) Lyran SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R13.78) ISC SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R14.78) LDR SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R15.78) Seltorian SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R17.78) Vudar SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33R11- 8
(R18.78) Paravian SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33C6 Pg- 30/R11- 8
(R19.78) Carnivon SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33C6 Pg- 66/R11- 8
(R502.78) Borak SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33E3 Pg- 16/R11- 8
(R503.78) Peladine SAS Small Auxiliary Scout Freighter0.33E4 Pg- 8/R11- 8
(R01.82) General F-SF Small Fast Freighter0.33R11- 12
(R01.94) General SAL Small Manufacturing Freighter0.33R12- 10
(R04.J61) Romulan FRTW Warp Powered Freighter0.33R04J- 56
(R08.11) Orion F-S Small Freighters0.33BS-1999- 3
(R9102.52) Argonian F-AS Small Armed Freighter0.33CGA2 Pg- 38
(R9103.15) Indirigan F-M Medium Freighter0.33CGI1 Pg- 37
(R9103.16) Indirigan F-AM Medium Armed Freighter0.33CGI1 Pg- 38
(R9103.17) Indirigan F-S Small Freighter0.33CGI1 Pg- 39
(R9103.18) Indirigan F-AS Small Armed Freighter0.33CGI1 Pg- 40
(R9106.13) Corporate Aggressors F-AS Small Armed Freighter0.33CGFS1 Pg- 21
(R01.SG85.46) General F-S (SG85.46 #2) Local Defense Freighter #20.33R11 Pg- 46
(R01.SG85.46) General F-S (SG85.46 #1) Local Defense Freighter #10.33R11 Pg- 46
(R01.YR1.5) General UFS Small Early Freighter0.33Y2- 4
(R01.YR1.20) General YF-AS Early Years Small Armed Freighter0.33Y3- 5
(R03.YR1.20) Klingon YF-AS Early Years Small Armed Freighter0.33Y3- 5
(R06.YR1.20) Gorn YF-AS Early Years Small Armed Freighter0.33Y3- 5
(R18.YR1.20) Paravian YF-AS Early Years Small Armed Freighter0.33Y3- 5
(R01.YR1.26A) General YF-ES Early Years Small Exploration Freighter0.33Y3- 7
(R03.YR1.26A) Klingon YF-ES Early Years Small Exploration Freighter0.33Y3- 7
(R06.YR1.26A) Gorn YF-ES Early Years Small Exploration Freighter0.33Y3- 7
(R13.YR1.26A) ISC YF-ES Early Years Small Exploration Freighter0.33Y3- 7
(R18.YR1.26A) Paravian YF-ES Early Years Small Exploration Freighter0.33Y3- 7
(R404.32) Maghadim FRT Freighter0.5C5- 87
(R01.6) General F-L (Base) Large Freighter W/Out Pods0.5BS-1999- 4
(R01.6) General F-L + 2xS-DT Large Freighters + Skid0.5SFT43 Pg- 5
(R01.6) General F-L + L-DT Large Freighter In Ballast With Ducktail0.5SFT43 Pg- 7
(R01.6) General F-L (Base/Military Eng) Large Freighter W/Out Pods & Military Engines0.5BS-1999- 4
(R01.6) General F-L + L-DT + 3xP-CC Large Freighter Three Pod Configuration With Ducktail0.5SFT43 Pg- 9
(R01.6) General F-L Large Freighters0.5BS-2011-SSD- 4/BS-1999- 4
(R01.6) General F-L + WB Large Freighters + 2xSkid + Ducktail0.5CL23 Pg- 52
(R01.12B) General F-ML Large Mine-Laying Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 7/AM- 7
(R01.21) General F-AL - Drone Large Drone-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 21/AM- 21
(R01.21) General F-AL - P2 Large Phaser-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 22/AM- 22
(R01.21) General F-AL - Fus Large Fusion-Armed Freighter0.5C1-1994- 10
(R01.21) General F-AL - Disr Large Disruptor-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 24/AM- 24
(R01.21) General F-AL Large Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 21/AM- 21
(R01.21) General F-AL - PL-D Large Plasma-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 23/AM- 23
(R01.21) General F-AL - PL-F Large Plasma-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 23/AM- 23
(R06.21) Gorn F-AL - PL-F Large Plasma-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 23/AM- 23
(R49.21) Tholian HG F-AL - PC Large Particle Cannon Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 21/AM- 21
(R08.21) Orion F-AL - PL-F Large Plasma-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 23/AM- 23
(R18.21) Paravian F-AL - QWT Large Quantum Wave Torpedo-Armed Freighter0.5AM-2014-SSD- 24/C6 Pg- 26
(R01.25B) General F-RL Large Repair Freighter0.5R01- 5
(R01.26B) General F-EL Large Exploration Freighter0.5R01- 7
(R01.37) General F-PL Large Prospecting Freighter0.5F1- 48
(R01.62) General F-HL Large Hospital Freighter0.5R08- 15
(R01.R1.GRP) General GRP-F Freighter Convoy0.5SSDB-04- 16
(R01.T) General F-AL-T Large Phaser-Armed Tournament Freighter0.5SFT42 Pg- 9
(R08.11) Orion F-L Large Freighters0.5BS-1999- 4
(R9102.51) Argonian FLEF Large Energy Flux Armed Freighter0.5CGA2 Pg- 37
(R9102.78) Argonian F-LSE Large Strobe-Equipped Freighter0.5CGA3 Pg- 23
(R9103.13) Indirigan F-L Large Freighter0.5CGI1 Pg- 35
(R9103.14) Indirigan F-AL Large Armed Freighter0.5CGI1 Pg- 35
(R9106.14) Corporate Aggressors F-AL Large Armed Freighter0.5CGFS1 Pg- 22
(R301.2) General Omega FS Small Freighter0.5CL20 Pg- 100
(R302.16) Maesron FBS Small Battle Freighter0.5CL21 Pg- 112
(R9910.14) Josers F-L Large Freighters0.5SFT18 Pg- 3
(R01.YR1.4) General UFL Early Large Freighter0.5Y2- 3
(R01.YR1.21) General YF-AL Early Years Large Armed Freighter0.5Y3- 6
(R06.YR1.21) Gorn YF-AL Early Years Large Armed Freighter0.5Y3- 6
(R13.YR1.21) ISC YF-AL Early Years Large Armed Freighter0.5Y3- 6
(R18.YR1.21) Paravian YF-AL Early Years Large Armed Freighter0.5Y3- 6
(R01.YR1.26B) General YF-EL Early Years Large Exploration Freighter0.5Y3- 8
(R06.YR1.26B) Gorn YF-EL Early Years Large Exploration Freighter0.5Y3- 8
(R13.YR1.26B) ISC YF-EL Early Years Large Exploration Freighter0.5Y3- 8
(R18.YR1.26B) Paravian YF-EL Early Years Large Exploration Freighter0.5Y3- 8
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-P2 Jumbo Phaser-2 Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-Disr Jumbo Disruptor Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-Drone Jumbo Drone Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-Fusion Jumbo Fusion Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-Pl-D Jumbo Plasma-D Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ Jumbo Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-PC Jumbo Particle Cannon Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A34) General F-AJ-Pl-F Jumbo Plasma-F Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 121
(R01.A35) General F-AH-Disr Heavy Disruptor Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-PC Heavy Particle Cannon Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-P2 Heavy Phaser-2 Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-Pl-D Heavy Pl-D Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-Pl-F Heavy Pl-F Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-Drone Heavy Drone Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH Heavy Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R01.A35) General F-AH-Fusion Heavy Fusion Armed-Freighter1CL52 Pg- 122
(R04.Y11) Romulan FRT Sublight Freighter1Y2- 40

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 09:15 pm: Edit

Too much clutter. I just need the pure cargo and ballast ships.

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation