Mike West:
Why would the KFAL have LS/RS phaser-3s? It is only, I admit, 5 years younger than the Falcon mauler. But the King Eagle and some other variants of the Eagle hull have RA/L and RA/R phasers on the rear of the engines. The larger arcs are more conducive to drone defense in the rear arc, and the small batteries with the optional firing arcs allow. the mauler weapon to be used in the forward arc.

By Dal Downing (Rambler) on Thursday, June 06, 2024 - 05:10 pm: Edit

Some probably noticed thiis alread but in, Captains log #51. The Romulan K3C Color SSD has the Transporter as Weapon's Pinkish color not System's Yellow.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, March 30, 2025 - 01:37 pm: Edit

Module F1

(R1.36) F-PS SSD: Missing minimum crew star.(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R1.38) FTP SSD: Ship Data Table missing Y175 refit bar. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.5) Jindarian DNX SSD: Has 6 T-bombs (same as DN) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 8).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.9) Jindarian BCX SSD: Has 6 T-bombs (same as BC) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 8).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.13) Jindarian CAX SSD: Has 4 T-bombs (same as CA) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 6).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.16) Jindarian CLP SSD: Year in service should be 182 (not 1) in the Crawford box. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.17) Jindarian CLT SSD: Year in service should be 1 (not 182) in the Crawford box. (Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

(R16.19) Jindarian CLX SSD: Has 4 T-bombs (same as CL) when X-ships should gain 2 more (for a total of 6).(Nick Samaras, 30 March 2025).

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, March 30, 2025 - 08:46 pm: Edit

Module F1

(R16.2) Jindarian DN SSD: Should have 10 deck crews (not 12) as there are only 10 spaces of non-prospecting shuttles. (Nick Samaras, March 30, 2025).

(R16.5) Jindarian DNX SSD: Should have 10 deck crews (not 12) as there are only 10 spaces of non-prospecting shuttles. (Nick Samaras, March 30, 2025).

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, April 01, 2025 - 04:06 pm: Edit

Module C4:

(R52.3) Qari T90 BCH SSD: This ship lacks a "6" on the damage control track when every other BCH I can recall has one. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).

(R54.10) Sharkhunter DN SSD: Damage control track is 6-4-2-2-2-0. This is worse than the BCH a 6-4-4-2-2-0. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).

(R59.3) Canadi'en OAK: The ships has the same sensor, scanner, dam con and excess damage tracks as the MAP and CA. The CW SSD in Module P6 shows a different set of tracks, which is probably what this ship should be. (Nick Samaras, April 1, 2025).

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Friday, April 04, 2025 - 10:56 pm: Edit

Module R8

(R2.121) Federation PFF SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)

(R3.135) Klingon G6 SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. The boarding parties track lists "4" instead of "6". (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)

(R4.118) Romulan KF4 SSD: The single hull box in the rear hull needs an "R" or "A" designation. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)

(R8.47) Orion DD SSD: Minimum crew should be 3 (not 4) as it has 12 crew units. (Nick Samaras, April 5, 2024)

By Jessica Orsini (Jessica_Orsini) on Thursday, April 10, 2025 - 10:41 am: Edit

Federation MSRB

(R2.113) New Heavy Fighter Carrier (NHV): illustration shows four sensor dishes and no photon tubes; SSD (Module R10) has two special sensors and two photon tubes. (Jessica Orsini, April 10, 2025)

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, July 13, 2025 - 08:48 pm: Edit

(YR1.3-13) Module Y2 ISC YBS - Per YR13.013 Tractors - "Type-Y (Range 1, 360°, any legal target); refitted to Type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y129". "Type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y120." should be updated to ""Type-M (Range 2) at no cost in Y129." - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025

(YR1.3-13) Module Y2 ISC YBS - Per YR13.014 Transporters - "extended to Range 3 at no cost in Y118; extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y136; extended to Range 5 at no cost in Y158."Transporters: Range 2, extended to range 3 at no cost in Y100, and extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y120." should be updated "Transporters: Range 2, extended to range 3 at no cost in Y118, and extended to Range 4 at no cost in Y136." - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025

(YR1.3A) Module Y2 General YCBS - The YIS for the phaser-1 version of the YCBS is Y130. Is this ship still under early years restrictions? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025

(YR1.3A-D) Module Y1 Romulan SBS, WBS, YBS, EBS - The Early Civilian Base Station has a rule of YR1.3A. The Romulan Early Base Stations have a duplicate rule for the YR1.3A. I would propose changing the rules to YR1.3A-4A to YR1.3A-4D. This will keep the base of YR1.3A and I believe to be less confusing. This is a similar paradigm as used by the Gorn Warp-Refitted Base Station (Module Y2, pg 60). - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025

(YR1.3E) Module Y1/MSSB-R04 Romulan EBS+ - Per (S3.3) if the cloak cost is not listed it's supposed to be 15% of the Economic/Combat BPV, the cloak refit should cost 14 BPV and not 12. The EBS+ changed the unit's systems significantly, so the increase cost seems appropriate. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

(YR1.3E) Module Y1/MSSB-R04 Romulan EBS+ - This unit has all the Treaty of Smarba restrictions removed. Per (M3.13) size class 3 units should have 4 T-Bombs and Dummy T-Bombs and not 2. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Jul 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, September 22, 2025 - 10:20 pm: Edit

(R5.24) Module K Kzinti SSCS - TADS-C should be TADSC per Annex #4. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(R5.24) Module R02 Kzinti SSCS - TADS-C should be TADSC per Annex #4. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.1-R6E) Module Y2 Gorn YDK - Should not the "Transporter:" paragraph come after the "Tractor:" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C2) Module Y2 General YGMBDM - Per the description in (YR1.8C2) "Bases of this type were only used by the Gorn Confederation and only between Y65 and Y80." The YIS should be Y65 and not 67. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C2) Module Y2 General YGMBDM - The "and only" in "Bases of this type were only used by the Gorn Confederation and only between Y65 and Y80." should be updated to "Bases of this type were only used by the Gorn Confederation between Y65 and Y80." - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C2) Module Y2 General YGMBDM - To match the YIS stated "Between Y68 and Y70, the phaser-3 was a warp-targeted laser." should be updated to "Between Y65 and Y70, the phaser-3 was a warp-targeted laser." - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C2) Module Y2 General YGMBDM - Should there be a listing for the laser version listed as YGMBDML. If there should be a new listing, I would propose a rule of YR1.8C2A. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C3) Module Y2 General YGMBDB - Should not there be a refit paragraph? Refit: Y120 refit removes the early years restrictions and changes the early year death bolt racks are replaced to hold four death bolts. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

(YR1.8C4) Module Y2 General YGMBDPD - The YIS for this unit should be Y31. Per (YR1.8C4) "Bases of this type were deployed initially by the Q'Naabians in Y31." - Ken Kazinski, 22 Sep 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 12, 2025 - 04:33 pm: Edit

(YR1.8F1) Module Y2 General YGBD1 - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F1) Module Y2 General YGBD1 - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F2) Module Y2 General YGBD2 - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F2) Module Y2 General YGBD2 - The Phaser-2 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F2) Module Y2 General YGBD2 - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F3) Module Y2 General YGBDP - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F3) Module Y2 General YGBDP - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F3) Module Y2 General YGBDP - The Photon Torpedo has a YIS of 120. Should there be a note that the unit has a Early Year Photon with no proximity or overloads until Y120? Note, the early year photon has a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F4) Module Y2 General YGBDD - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F4) Module Y2 General YGBDD - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F4) Module Y2 General YGBDD - The Disruptor Bolt has a YIS of 120. Should there be a note that the unit has a Early Year Disruptor Bolt with no overloads until Y120? Note, the early year disruptor bolt has a YIS of Y63. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F4) Module Y2 General YGBDD - Per the Kzinti Master Rulebook, (YR1.8-5) page 124, the Kzinti used this type of early ground base. "Only the Klingons and Lyrans employed bases of this type." should be "Only the Klingons, Kzinti and Lyrans employed bases of this type." - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F5) Module Y2 General YGBDN - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F5) Module Y2 General YGBDN - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; this unit should have a YIS of Y62. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - Based on (YR1.8F6), the Gorn, Bolt, Phaser unit's YIS should be Y70 and not Y71. Should not the Y104 Gorn only entry be Y105? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F) Module Y2 General YGBD - Should there be a note that in Y120 early year restrictions are removed for all early ground bases? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F6) Module Y2 General YGBDGG - This unit should have the Y180 sabot refit as there are 1 plasma system and there is no the year out of service listed for this unit. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F7) Module Y2 General YGBDFG - This unit should have the Y180 sabot refit as there are 1 plasma system and there is no the year out of service listed for this unit. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F7) Module Y2 General YGBDFI - "See (Y13.012) for PPTs." should be "See (YR13.011) for PPTs." (YR13.012) refers to Phaser-1s while (YR13.011) refers to PPTs. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8) Module Y2 General YGBD - There should be a note about the SABOT refit. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 12, 2025 - 04:34 pm: Edit

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFR - The Y66 listing should have a Laser and No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFR - The Y89 listing should have a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDGR - The Y66 listing should have a Laseer note and a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDGR - The Y89 listing should have a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFG - Based on (YR1.8F7) should not the phaser unit YIS be Y70 and not Y71. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 26, 2025 - 07:21 pm: Edit

(YR1.8F7) Module Y2 General YGBDFR - This unit should have a note for the Y180 sabot refit. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F8) Module Y2 General YGBDV - Should there be a "ISC" or "Veltressai" note or both? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F8) Module Y2 General YGBDV - Should not the YIS for this unit be Y33 the same as the Veltressai warp-driven heavy cruisers? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F9) Module Y2 General YGBDPLB - Should there be a "ISC" or "Korlivilar" note or both? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F9) Module Y2 General YGBDPLB - Should not the YIS for this unit be Y32 the same as the Korlivilar warp-driven cruisers? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F10) Module Y2 General YGBDPLC - Should there be a "ISC" or "Rovillians" note or both? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F10) Module Y2 General YGBDPLC - Should not the YIS for this unit be Y32 the same as the Rovillian warp-driven heavy cruisers? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F11) Module Y2 General YGBDPLV - Should there be a "ISC" or "Pronhoulites" note or both? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F11) Module Y2 General YGBDPLV - Should not the YIS for this unit be Y33 the same as the Pronhoulites warp-driven heavy cruisers? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F13) Module Y2 General YGBDDC - The Phaser Capacitor system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; should not the YIS be 62. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

(YR1.8F13) Module Y2 General YGBDDC - The Phaser-3 system has a YIS of 62 and is after the unit was first introduced in Y60; should not the YIS be 62. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 26, 2025 - 07:22 pm: Edit

(YE23.4) Module Y1 - The disruptor cannon combat chart stops at range 22 but should go to range 30 as per (YE23.13) where the maximum range is listed as 30. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 26, 2025 - 07:23 pm: Edit

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YGBDWTL - Should not there be a laser note? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YGBDQ - Should not there be a laser note? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General BarM - Should not the ship type be YBarM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YCarM - Should not the ship type be YCarM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General HBM - Should not the ship type be YHBM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General HosM - Should not the ship type be YHosM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General PAM - Should not the ship type be YPAM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General SciM - Should not the ship type be YSciM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General VIPM - Should not the ship type be YVIPM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, November 10, 2025 - 11:26 pm: Edit

(YR2.34) Module Y3 Federation YBB - Should not there be a note that the transporter bombs are range 0 (See YM3.0). - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.34) Module Y3 Federation YBB - The paragarph "NAMES:" should be "Known Names:" to match the standard. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.34) Module Y3 Federation YBB - For clarification, there should be a note to state if this unit has the early years restrictions removed in Y120 or not. This affects many of the units systems, e.g. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Oct 2025.

(YR2.18) Module Y2 Federation YCC - In the "Names" paragarph, should not "Other" be "At least two others were built." per CL52. - Ken Kazinski, 03 November 2025.

(YR2.18) Module Y2 Federation YCC - By convention "NAMES:" should be "Known names:" - Ken Kazinski, 07 Nov 2025.


(YR2.4) Module YG3 - Federation YCA - YG3 shows the BPV to be 82, but should be 84 per the Y1 SSD, page 5. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.4) Module YG3 - Federation YCA - YG3 shows the Rule Number to be YR2.3, but should be YR2.4 per the Y1 SSD, page 5. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 15, 2025 - 01:09 pm: Edit

(YR2.20) Module Y2 Federation YCM SSD - The seeking weapon paragraph references rule (F3.211) can control weapons equal to one-half of their sensor rating but there is no note on the SSD. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) Module Y2 Federation YCM - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) Module Y2 Federation YCM - Per "The original warp-refitted commando cruisers (YR2.19) were converted to this design beginning in Y84 (one each year)" should the YIS be Y84 in this sentance as the SSD lists Y85 possibly update the sentence to "converted to this design beginning in Y85 (one each year)". - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) Module Y2 Federation YCM SSD - For the YCM should there only be 4 excess damage boxes and not 5? - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) Module YG3 Federation YCM - Per the landing paragraph "The ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434) (other early light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." There should be "PL" and "LB" notes. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 08:49 pm: Edit

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB Scr - As the YBB is from module Y3 should not the product where published be Y3 and not Y1? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB Scr - Should not the N4 note be included? N4 - Lower ratings for docking points, explosion strength, and command rating are used if the warp engine is dropped. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB SS - As the YBB is from module Y3 should not the product where published be Y3 and not Y1? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.6) Module YG3 Federation YDN Scr - Should not the N4 note be included? N4 - Lower ratings for docking points, explosion strength, and command rating are used if the warp engine is dropped. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 Federation YDN-Scr, should be YDN Scr per Annex 3 (page 9). - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 - The hull type YBB-Scr text is "YBB Scr, YBB SS." and the hull type "YC-Scr" text is "Any YBB, YDN, YCA, YCC, YDD, YTG saucer without warp engines." Should not the "YBB" be removed from the "YC-Scr"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 Federation YCC Scr - The Product Where Published should be Y2, same as the YCC. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 22, 2025 - 07:47 am: Edit

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - The BPV in Annex 3 is listed at 48, but the SSD shows 57. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - Should not "Y50" be Y62 in "Hulls of this class remained in production from Y50 through Y170," or should the YIS for this unit be Y50? If it is Y50 then there will need to be updates on the systems for the earlier YIS. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Per "powered landing system (P2.434) (other warp-refitted light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." should not this unit have the PL and LB note. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Should not "crash landing" be "crash-landing" in "crash landing bonus (P2.4311)."? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module Y2 Federation WCM - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module Y2 Federation WCM SSD - Other ships of this class have 5 excess damage boxes but the SSD only shows 4, should there be 5? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module Y2 Federation WCM SSD - The SSD shows center hull boxes, should they not be rear hull? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 26, 2025 - 07:46 am: Edit

(YR2.47) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - The YIS is listed as Y74 but the ship description states "The Vulcans completed one ship of this type in Y71". Should not the YIS for this unit should be Y71. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) VDI - The BPV is listed as 44 and should be 49 per CL21 which states "The larger engines represent a later upgrade (VDI) with a BPV of 49 which became available from Y80." - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.


(YR2.13) Module Y1 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - Should not "Basically an enlarged version" be "Basically, an enlarged version"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.13) Module Y1 Federation (Vulcan) YVC - "only for self defense" be "only for self-defense"? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.


(YR2.29) Module Y2 Federation (Andorian) WNF - By convention the "Names:" paragraph should be "Known Names:" - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.29) Module Y2 Federation (Andorian) WNF - Should not the "Known names:" paragraph come after the "SSD and counter" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.42) Module Y2 Federation (Rigellian) WRCC - By convention the "Names:" paragraph should be "Known Names:" - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

(YR2.42) Module Y2 Federation (Rigellian) WRCC - Should not the "Known names:" paragraph come after the "SSD and counter" paragraph? - Ken Kazinski, 23 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 12:07 pm: Edit

(YR3.17) Module Y2 Klingon D4G - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

(YR3.20) Module Y2 Klingon D4N - Should the period be at the end of the sentence and not with in the parenthesis in "the ship was a legitimate target.)"? "target.)" should be "target)." - Ken Kazinski, 28 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 04:38 pm: Edit

(YR3.5) Module YG3 Klingon F4 - The F4 SSD from SL85 (pg 1) shows the BPV as 48; CL18 (pg 98) shows the BPV as 53; module Y1 (pg 24) show the BPV to be 53. The BPV listed in YG3 is 45, but should be 53. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) Module YG3 Klingon F4J - The unit's YIS (75) is before the Klingon F4 (Y78) which this unit is it a variant of. Either the YIS for the F4 should be updated to Y75 or the YIS for the F4J should be Y78. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 04:39 pm: Edit

(YR3.5) Module Y1 Klingon F4 - The (R12.47) WYN KF4 Purchased Klingon F4 is listed as a variant of the F4 but it is not listed in a 'variant of' paragraph. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 04:39 pm: Edit

(YR3.21) Module Y2 Klingon F4G SSD - The minimum crew units should be 3 and not 4. Troop Transports (Units with a T Note) subtract their boarding parties to determine the crew size for use with (G9.41). - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.21) Module Y2 Klingon F4G SSD - The minimum crew units should be 3 and not 4. Troop Transports (Units with a T Note) subtract their boarding parties to determine the crew size for use with (G9.41). - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) Module Y2 Klingon F4J - Should not "Also like the F3J warp-refitted penal frigates" be "Also, like the F3J warp-refitted penal frigates"? - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) Module Y2 Klingon F4J - The unit's YIS (75) is before the Klingon F4 (Y78) which this unit is it a variant of. Either the YIS for the F4 should be updated to Y75 or the YIS for the F4J should be Y78. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) Module Y2 Klingon F4J - By convention, the start of the 'NAMES:' paragraph should be 'Known names:' or 'Known name:'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 09:10 pm: Edit

(R3.11) Module YG3 Klingon P-C1 - The Product Where Published should be AM and not BS. See Advanced Missions, pg 109 and Advanced Missions SSD, pg 52. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 09:10 pm: Edit

(YR3.23) Module Y2 Klingon P-YP2 - By convention, the start of the 'NAMES:' paragraph should be 'Known names:' or 'Known name:'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) Module Y2 Klingon P-YT3 SSD - The minimum crew units should be 1 and not 2. Troop Transports (Units with a T Note) subtract their boarding parties to determine the crew size for use with (G9.41). - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) Module Y2 Klingon P-YT3 - The capitalization guide dated 1/4/10 states heavy weapons squad, "heavy-weapons squad should be heavy weapons squad". - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.24) Module Y2 Klingon P-YT3 - By convention, the start of the 'NAMES:' paragraph should be 'Known names:' or 'Known name:'. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.